Suppr超能文献

草药减肥药的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of herbal medicines for weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

University of Sydney, Boden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, Central Clinical School, Charles Perkins Centre, New South Wales, Australia.

University of Technology Sydney, Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Jun;22(6):891-903. doi: 10.1111/dom.13973. Epub 2020 Feb 15.

Abstract

AIM

To update the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of complementary medicines to assist in weight loss by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of herbal medicines for weight loss.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) were searched from inception until August 2018. A total of 54 randomized placebo-controlled trials of healthy overweight or obese adults were identified. Meta-analyses were conducted for herbal medicines with ≥4 studies available. Weight differences of ≥2.5 kg were considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

As a single agent, only Phaseolus vulgaris resulted in a statistically significant weight loss compared to placebo, although this was not considered clinically significant. No effect was seen for Camellia sinensis or Garcinia cambogia. Statistically, but not clinically, significant differences were observed for combination preparations containing C. sinensis, P. vulgaris or Ephedra sinica. Of the herbal medicines trialled in ≤3 randomized controlled trials, statistically and clinically significant weight loss compared to placebo was reported for Irvingia gabonensis, Cissus quadrangularis, and Sphaeranthus indicus combined with Garcinia mangostana, among others, but these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of studies, generally poor methodological quality, and poor reporting of the herbal medicine interventions. Most herbal medicines appeared safe for consumption over the short duration of the studies (commonly ≤12 weeks). Some warrant further investigation to determine effect size, dosage and long-term safety.

CONCLUSION

There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend any of the herbal medicines for weight loss included in the present review.

摘要

目的

通过系统评价和荟萃分析减肥草药,更新关于补充药物在减肥方面的疗效和安全性的现有证据。

方法

从建库到 2018 年 8 月,检索了 4 个电子数据库(Medline、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science)。共确定了 54 项健康超重或肥胖成年人的随机安慰剂对照试验。对于有≥4 项研究的草药进行了荟萃分析。体重差异≥2.5kg 被认为具有临床意义。

结果

作为单一药物,只有 Phaseolus vulgaris 与安慰剂相比,体重减轻有统计学意义,但这并不被认为具有临床意义。Camellia sinensis 或 Garcinia cambogia 没有效果。对于含有 C.sinensis、P.vulgaris 或 Ephedra sinica 的组合制剂,观察到统计学上但不是临床上显著的差异。在≤3 项随机对照试验中进行试验的草药中,与安慰剂相比,Irvingia gabonensis、Cissus quadrangularis 和 Sphaeranthus indicus 与 Garcinia mangostana 联合使用等具有统计学和临床意义的体重减轻,但由于研究数量少、方法学质量普遍较差以及草药干预措施报告不佳,这些发现应谨慎解释。大多数草药在研究的短期(通常≤12 周)内似乎是安全的。有些值得进一步研究,以确定剂量、作用大小和长期安全性。

结论

目前没有足够的证据推荐本综述中包含的任何用于减肥的草药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验