Rose Dawn, Cameron Daniel J, Lovatt Peter J, Grahn Jessica A, Annett Lucy E
School of Music, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Department of Psychology and Sport Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
J Mov Disord. 2020 Jan;13(1):47-56. doi: 10.14802/jmd.19043. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Spontaneous motor tempo (SMT), observed in walking, tapping and clapping, tends to occur around 2 Hz. Initiating and controlling movement can be difficult for people with Parkinson's (PWP), but studies have not identified whether PWP differ from controls in SMT. For community-based interventions, e.g. dancing, it would be helpful to know a baseline SMT to optimize the tempi of cued activities. Therefore, this study compared finger tapping (FT), toe tapping (TT) and stepping 'on the spot' (SS) in PWP and two groups of healthy controls [age-matched controls (AMC) and young healthy controls (YHC)], as SMT is known to change with age.
Participants (PWP; n = 30, AMC; n = 23, YHC; n = 35) were asked to tap or step on the spot at a natural pace for two trials lasting 40 seconds. The central 30 seconds were averaged for analyses using mean inter-onset intervals (IOI) and coefficient of variation (CoV) to measure rate and variability respectively.
PWP had faster SMT than both control groups, depending on the movement modality: FT, F(2, 87) = 7.92, p < 0.01 (PWP faster than YHC); TT, F(2, 87) = 4.89, p = 0.01 (PWP faster than AMC); and SS, F(2, 77) = 3.26, p = 0.04 (PWP faster than AMC). PWP had higher CoV (more variable tapping) than AMC in FT only, F(2, 87) = 4.10, p = 0.02.
This study provides the first direct comparison of SMT between PWP and two control groups for different types of movements.
suggest SMT is generally faster in PWP than control groups, and more variable when measured with finger tapping compared to stepping on the spot.
在行走、轻敲和鼓掌中观察到的自发运动节奏(SMT)往往出现在2赫兹左右。对于帕金森病患者(PWP)来说,启动和控制运动可能会很困难,但研究尚未确定PWP在SMT方面是否与对照组存在差异。对于基于社区的干预措施,如舞蹈,了解基线SMT以优化提示活动的节奏会很有帮助。因此,本研究比较了PWP以及两组健康对照组[年龄匹配对照组(AMC)和年轻健康对照组(YHC)]的手指轻敲(FT)、脚趾轻敲(TT)和原地踏步(SS),因为已知SMT会随年龄变化。
参与者(PWP;n = 30,AMC;n = 23,YHC;n = 35)被要求以自然节奏进行原地轻敲或踏步,进行两次时长为40秒的试验。对中间30秒的数据进行平均,以便使用平均发作间期(IOI)和变异系数(CoV)分别分析速率和变异性。
根据运动方式的不同,PWP的SMT比两个对照组都要快:FT,F(2, 87) = 7.92,p < 0.01(PWP比YHC快);TT,F(2, 87) = 4.89,p = 0.01(PWP比AMC快);SS,F(2, 77) = 3.26,p = 0.04(PWP比AMC快)。仅在FT方面,PWP的CoV(敲击变异性更大)高于AMC,F(2, 87) = 4.10,p = 0.02。
本研究首次对PWP与两个对照组在不同类型运动中的SMT进行了直接比较。
表明PWP的SMT总体上比对照组快,并且与原地踏步相比,用手指轻敲测量时变异性更大。