Suppr超能文献

一种非常稳定的次氯酸配方的抗菌功效与用于治疗伤口的其他防腐剂的比较:有无生物膜的微生物的体外研究。

Antimicrobial efficacy of a very stable hypochlorous acid formula compared with other antiseptics used in treating wounds: in-vitro study on micro-organisms with or without biofilm.

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Salud Publica y Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jun;105(2):289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many antiseptics have been used to treat wounds.

AIM

To compare the microbicidal efficacy of ClHO (Clortech®) with other antiseptics used on wounds, healthy skin and mucous membranes.

METHODS

The microbicidal efficacy of 13 antiseptic products on eight micro-organisms (three Gram-positive; three Gram-negative; two yeasts) inoculated on organic germ-carriers was studied. In addition, the loss of efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with biofilm was assessed with the six best-performing products.

FINDINGS

Chlorhexidine (1%) had the highest microbicidal effect at 1 min. At 5 min, 500 and 1500 mg/L ClHO showed similar, or better, activity than the other antiseptics studied. The ClHO concentration of 300 mg/L achieved this same efficacy at 10 min. The product that lost the most efficacy due to biofilm was 1% chlorhexidine, while 1% PVP-I and ClHO at either 300 or 500 mg/L were moderately affected by biofilm. The most effective in the presence of biofilm was ClHO at 1500 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

ClHO at medium-low concentrations (300 or 500 mg/L) is a good antiseptic that can be used on wounds and mucous membranes for 5-10 min. Lower concentrations of ClHO, as well as of the other antiseptics studied, were less effective or more altered by the biofilm. ClHO at a concentration of 1500 mg/L is very effective in the presence or absence of biofilm that can be used on healthy skin for 5 min.

摘要

背景

许多消毒剂被用于处理伤口。

目的

比较 ClHO(Clortech®)与其他用于伤口、健康皮肤和黏膜的消毒剂的杀菌效果。

方法

研究了 13 种消毒剂产品对接种在有机载体上的 8 种微生物(3 种革兰氏阳性菌;3 种革兰氏阴性菌;2 种酵母菌)的杀菌效果。此外,还评估了 6 种表现最好的产品对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的杀菌效果。

发现

氯己定(1%)在 1 分钟时具有最高的杀菌效果。在 5 分钟时,500 和 1500mg/L ClHO 表现出与研究中的其他消毒剂相似或更好的活性。ClHO 浓度为 300mg/L 在 10 分钟时达到相同的效果。由于生物膜而导致杀菌效果损失最大的产品是 1%氯己定,而 1%PVP-I 和 ClHO 浓度为 300 或 500mg/L 则受到生物膜的中度影响。在存在生物膜的情况下最有效的是 ClHO 浓度为 1500mg/L。

结论

中低浓度(300 或 500mg/L)ClHO 是一种良好的消毒剂,可用于伤口和黏膜 5-10 分钟。ClHO 以及研究中的其他消毒剂的较低浓度的杀菌效果较差或受生物膜影响更大。ClHO 浓度为 1500mg/L 在存在或不存在生物膜的情况下非常有效,可用于健康皮肤 5 分钟。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验