Harris Alon, Guidoboni Giovanna, Siesky Brent, Mathew Sunu, Verticchio Vercellin Alice C, Rowe Lucas, Arciero Julia
Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020 Jan 24:100841. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100841.
Alterations in ocular blood flow have been identified as important risk factors for the onset and progression of numerous diseases of the eye. In particular, several population-based and longitudinal-based studies have provided compelling evidence of hemodynamic biomarkers as independent risk factors for ocular disease throughout several different geographic regions. Despite this evidence, the relative contribution of blood flow to ocular physiology and pathology in synergy with other risk factors and comorbidities (e.g., age, gender, race, diabetes and hypertension) remains uncertain. There is currently no gold standard for assessing all relevant vascular beds in the eye, and the heterogeneous vascular biomarkers derived from multiple ocular imaging technologies are non-interchangeable and difficult to interpret as a whole. As a result of these disease complexities and imaging limitations, standard statistical methods often yield inconsistent results across studies and are unable to quantify or explain a patient's overall risk for ocular disease. Combining mathematical modeling with artificial intelligence holds great promise for advancing data analysis in ophthalmology and enabling individualized risk assessment from diverse, multi-input clinical and demographic biomarkers. Mechanism-driven mathematical modeling makes virtual laboratories available to investigate pathogenic mechanisms, advance diagnostic ability and improve disease management. Artificial intelligence provides a novel method for utilizing a vast amount of data from a wide range of patient types to diagnose and monitor ocular disease. This article reviews the state of the art and major unanswered questions related to ocular vascular anatomy and physiology, ocular imaging techniques, clinical findings in glaucoma and other eye diseases, and mechanistic modeling predictions, while laying a path for integrating clinical observations with mathematical models and artificial intelligence. Viable alternatives for integrated data analysis are proposed that aim to overcome the limitations of standard statistical approaches and enable individually tailored precision medicine in ophthalmology.
眼部血流改变已被确认为多种眼部疾病发生和进展的重要危险因素。特别是,一些基于人群和纵向的研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明血流动力学生物标志物在不同地理区域都是眼部疾病的独立危险因素。尽管有这些证据,但血流与其他危险因素和合并症(如年龄、性别、种族、糖尿病和高血压)协同作用对眼部生理和病理的相对贡献仍不确定。目前尚无评估眼部所有相关血管床的金标准,且源自多种眼部成像技术的异质血管生物标志物不可互换,难以整体解读。由于这些疾病的复杂性和成像局限性,标准统计方法在各项研究中往往产生不一致的结果,无法量化或解释患者患眼部疾病的总体风险。将数学建模与人工智能相结合,有望推动眼科数据分析的发展,并根据多样的多输入临床和人口统计学生物标志物进行个性化风险评估。机制驱动的数学建模提供了虚拟实验室,可用于研究致病机制、提高诊断能力和改善疾病管理。人工智能提供了一种利用来自广泛患者类型的大量数据来诊断和监测眼部疾病的新方法。本文综述了与眼部血管解剖和生理、眼部成像技术、青光眼及其他眼部疾病的临床发现以及机制建模预测相关的最新技术水平和主要未解决问题,同时为将临床观察与数学模型和人工智能相结合奠定了基础。提出了综合数据分析的可行替代方案,旨在克服标准统计方法的局限性,并在眼科实现个性化的精准医疗。