Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, United Kingdom.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Apr;102(4):707-710. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0710.
The value of baseline entomological data to any future area-wide release campaign relies on the application of consistent methods to produce results comparable across different times and places in a stepwise progression to larger releases. Traditionally, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and operational plans support this consistency and, thus, the validity of emergent data. When release plans include transgenic mosquitoes for vector control or other novel beneficial insects, additional factors come into play such as biosafety permits, stakeholder acceptance, and ethics approval, which require even greater coordination and thoroughness. An audit approach was developed to verify the correct use of SOPs and appropriate performance of tasks during mosquito mark, release, recapture (MRR) studies. Audit questions matched SOPs, permit terms and conditions, and other key criteria, and can be used to support subsequent "spot check" verification by field teams. An external team of auditors, however, was found to be effective for initial checks in this example before the use of a transgenic strain of laboratory mosquitoes. We recommend similar approaches for field studies using release of novel beneficial insects, to ensure useful and valid data as an outcome and to support confidence in the rigor of the step-wise process.
基础昆虫学数据对于未来任何全面的区域释放活动的价值都取决于应用一致的方法,以在逐步扩大释放规模的过程中,在不同时间和地点产生可比较的结果。传统上,标准作业程序 (SOP) 和作业计划支持这种一致性,从而确保了新出现数据的有效性。当释放计划包括用于病媒控制或其他新型有益昆虫的转基因蚊子时,会涉及到额外的因素,如生物安全许可证、利益相关者的接受程度和伦理批准,这需要更大的协调和彻底性。已经开发了一种审核方法来验证在蚊子标记、释放、重捕 (MRR) 研究过程中正确使用 SOP 和适当执行任务。审核问题与 SOP、许可证条款和条件以及其他关键标准相匹配,可用于支持现场团队随后进行的“抽查”验证。然而,在使用实验室转基因蚊子株之前,外部审核团队被发现对于这种情况下的初步检查是有效的。我们建议在使用新型有益昆虫释放进行现场研究时采用类似的方法,以确保获得有用和有效的数据,并支持对逐步过程的严格性的信心。