• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术:在机器人内镜泌尿外科时代,它仍然有效吗?它能更有效吗?

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: is it still valid in the era of robotic endourology? Can it be more efficient?

机构信息

Department of Urology, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn.

Department of Urology, Medical School Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Mar;30(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000732.

DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000732
PMID:31990816
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of the article is to evaluate the actual role of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of urolithiasis based on the new developments of flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

RECENT FINDINGS

In Western Europe, there is a significant change of techniques used for treatment of renal stones with an increase of FURS and a decrease of ESWL. The reasons for this include the change of indications, technical improvement of the endourologic armamentarium, including robotic assistance. Mostly relevant is the introduction of digital reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes, whereas micro-PCNL has been abandoned. Some companies have stopped production of lithotripters and novel ideas to improve the efficacy of shock waves have not been implemented in the actual systems. Promising shock-wave technologies include the use of burst-shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) or high-frequent ESWL. The main advantage would be the very fast pulverization of the stone as shown in in-vitro models.

SUMMARY

The role of ESWL in the management of urolithiasis is decreasing, whereas FURS is constantly progressing. Quality and safety of intracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using holmium:YAG-laser under endoscopic control clearly outweighs the advantages of noninvasive ESWL. To regain ground, new technologies like burst-SWL or high-frequent ESWL have to be implemented in new systems.

摘要

目的综述

本文旨在基于软式输尿管镜(FURS)和经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的新进展,评估体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)在治疗尿路结石中的实际作用。

最近的发现

在西欧,治疗肾结石的技术有显著变化,FURS 的应用增加,ESWL 的应用减少。原因包括适应证的改变、包括机器人辅助在内的腔内器械技术的改进。最相关的是数字化可重复使用和一次性使用的软式输尿管镜的引入,而微经皮肾镜碎石术已被放弃。一些公司已停止生产碎石机,而提高冲击波疗效的新想法尚未在实际系统中实施。有前途的冲击波技术包括使用爆发式冲击波碎石术(SWL)或高频 ESWL。其主要优势在于如在体外模型中所展示的,非常快速地粉碎结石。

总结

ESWL 在尿路结石治疗中的作用正在减弱,而 FURS 则在不断发展。在腔镜控制下使用钬:YAG 激光进行腔内冲击波碎石术的质量和安全性显然优于无创性 ESWL 的优势。为了重新获得优势,必须在新系统中实施新的技术,如爆发式 SWL 或高频 ESWL。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: is it still valid in the era of robotic endourology? Can it be more efficient?体外冲击波碎石术:在机器人内镜泌尿外科时代,它仍然有效吗?它能更有效吗?
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Mar;30(2):120-129. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000732.
2
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
3
The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.经皮肾镜碎石术、软性输尿管镜碎石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下极结石的临床和成本效益:肾下极结石随机对照试验(PUrE RCT)方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 4;21(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04326-x.
4
New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.输尿管镜检查和经皮肾镜取石术的新技术
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Jan;26(1):95-106. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000240.
5
Updates in endourological management of urolithiasis.尿石症腔内泌尿外科治疗的进展
Int J Urol. 2019 Feb;26(2):172-183. doi: 10.1111/iju.13885. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.超微经皮肾镜取石术、软性输尿管镜检查术和冲击波碎石术治疗1-2cm下极肾结石的疗效比较
Urol Int. 2019;102(2):153-159. doi: 10.1159/000493508. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
7
Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.经皮肾镜取石术、输尿管镜碎石取石术、体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立肾结石的腔内泌尿外科管理:欧洲泌尿外科学会青年学者泌尿外科学组和泌尿技术组的系统评价。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):7-17. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0455. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.钬激光输尿管软镜与体外冲击波碎石术治疗<2cm 肾结石:Meta 分析。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Aug;44(4):353-65. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0832-y. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
9
Tailored minimally invasive management of complex calculi in horseshoe kidney.马蹄肾复杂结石的个体化微创治疗
J Xray Sci Technol. 2015;23(5):601-10. doi: 10.3233/XST-150512.
10
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.尿路结石的治疗选择:经皮肾镜碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术、体外冲击波碎石术和主动监测。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of music therapy for pain control of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.音乐疗法对体外冲击波碎石术疼痛控制效果的Meta 分析:随机对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38182. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038182.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: retrospective study on possible predictors of treatment success and revisiting the role of non-contrast-enhanced computer tomography in kidney and ureteral stone disease.体外冲击波碎石术:治疗成功的可能预测因素的回顾性研究及重新探讨非增强计算机断层扫描在肾结石和输尿管结石病中的作用。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 17;52(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01570-7.
3
Factors influencing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a retrospective study.
影响超声引导体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石疗效的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Dec 20;52(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01512-9.
4
High-frequency shock wave lithotripsy: stone comminution and evaluation of renal parenchyma injury in a porcine ex-vivo model.高频冲击波碎石术:在猪离体模型中对结石粉碎和肾实质损伤的评估。
World J Urol. 2023 Jul;41(7):1929-1934. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04441-9. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
5
The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Patients with Urinary Calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石的临床疗效及安全性。
Dis Markers. 2022 Oct 13;2022:3468692. doi: 10.1155/2022/3468692. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect of comfort care on pain degree and nursing satisfaction in patients undergoing kidney stone surgery.舒适护理对肾结石手术患者疼痛程度及护理满意度的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):11993-11998. eCollection 2021.
7
Contemporary treatment trends for upper urinary tract stones in a total population analysis in Germany from 2006 to 2019: will shock wave lithotripsy become extinct?2006年至2019年德国全人群分析中上尿路结石的当代治疗趋势:冲击波碎石术会灭绝吗?
World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):185-191. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03818-y. Epub 2021 Aug 28.