• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

色彩营养信息悖论:提示含糖量对健康年轻女性食物线索反应的影响。

The Color Nutrition Information Paradox: Effects of Suggested Sugar Content on Food Cue Reactivity in Healthy Young Women.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Jan 24;12(2):312. doi: 10.3390/nu12020312.

DOI:10.3390/nu12020312
PMID:31991601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7071185/
Abstract

Color nutrition information (CNI) based on a traffic light system conveys information about food quality with a glance. The color red typically indicates detrimental food characteristics (e.g., very high sugar content) and aims at inhibiting food shopping and consumption. Red may, however, also elicit cross-modal associations with sweet taste, which is a preferable food characteristic. We conducted two experiments. An eye-tracking study investigated whether CNI has an effect on cue reactivity (dwell time, saccadic latency, wanting/liking) for sweet foods. The participants were presented with images depicting sweets (e.g., cake). Each image was preceded by a colored circle that informed about the sugar content of the food (red = high, green = low, gray = unknown). It was tested whether the red circle would help the participants to direct their gaze away from the 'high sugar' item. A second experiment investigated whether colored prime circles (red, green, gray) without nutrition information would influence the assumed sweetness of a food. In Experiment 1, CNI had the opposite of the intended effect. Dwell time and saccadic latency were higher for food items preceded by a red compared to a green circle. This unintended response was positively associated with participants' liking of sweet foods. CNI did not change the wanting/liking of the displayed foods. In Experiment 2, we found no evidence for color priming on the assumed sweetness of food. Our results question whether CNI is helpful to influence initial cue reactivity toward sweet foods.

摘要

基于红绿灯系统的色彩营养信息 (CNI) 可让人一眼了解食物质量。红色通常表示有害的食物特性(例如,糖含量非常高),旨在抑制购买和食用食物。然而,红色也可能与甜味产生跨模态联想,而甜味是一种更受欢迎的食物特性。我们进行了两项实验。一项眼动研究调查了 CNI 是否会影响对甜食的线索反应(注视时间、眼跳潜伏期、想要/喜欢)。参与者被呈现描绘甜食(如蛋糕)的图像。每个图像之前都有一个彩色圆圈,告知食物的糖含量(红色=高,绿色=低,灰色=未知)。测试红色圆圈是否有助于参与者将目光从“高糖”物品上移开。第二项实验调查了没有营养信息的彩色启动圆圈(红色、绿色、灰色)是否会影响对食物甜度的假设。在实验 1 中,CNI 的效果与预期相反。与绿色圆圈相比,红色圆圈前的食物项目的注视时间和眼跳潜伏期更高。这种非预期的反应与参与者对甜食的喜爱呈正相关。CNI 并没有改变参与者对所展示食物的想要/喜欢程度。在实验 2 中,我们没有发现颜色启动对食物甜度假设的影响。我们的结果质疑 CNI 是否有助于影响对甜食的初始线索反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5875/7071185/ff0bd8b92970/nutrients-12-00312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5875/7071185/b2e476fd5450/nutrients-12-00312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5875/7071185/ff0bd8b92970/nutrients-12-00312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5875/7071185/b2e476fd5450/nutrients-12-00312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5875/7071185/ff0bd8b92970/nutrients-12-00312-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Color Nutrition Information Paradox: Effects of Suggested Sugar Content on Food Cue Reactivity in Healthy Young Women.色彩营养信息悖论:提示含糖量对健康年轻女性食物线索反应的影响。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 24;12(2):312. doi: 10.3390/nu12020312.
2
The Color Red Supports Avoidance Reactions to Unhealthy Food.红色会促使人们对不健康食品产生回避反应。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(5):335-45. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000299.
3
The Influence of Adding Spices to Reduced Sugar Foods on Overall Liking.添加香料对低糖食品整体喜好度的影响。
J Food Sci. 2018 Mar;83(3):814-821. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14069. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
4
The impact of replacing sugar- by artificially-sweetened beverages on brain and behavioral responses to food viewing - An exploratory study.代糖饮料替代含糖饮料对观看食物时大脑和行为反应的影响——一项探索性研究。
Appetite. 2018 Apr 1;123:160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.019. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
The effect of health/hedonic claims on consumer hedonic and sensory perception of sugar reduction: Case study with orange/passionfruit nectars.健康/享乐性宣称对消费者对减糖的享乐性和感官感知的影响:以橙汁/西番莲果汁为例的案例研究。
Food Res Int. 2018 Jun;108:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Choosing or rejecting a food item, does framing matter? And what has sugar to do with it!选择或拒绝食物,框架重要吗?糖又跟这个有什么关系!
Appetite. 2019 Dec 1;143:104410. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104410. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
A Statistical Analysis of a Traffic-Light Food Rating System to Promote Healthy Nutrition and Body Weight.一种用于促进健康营养和体重的交通灯食品评级系统的统计分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 30;9(6):1336-41. doi: 10.1177/1932296815592408.
8
Effects of Coloring Food Images on the Propensity to Eat: A Placebo Approach With Color Suggestions.给食物图片上色对进食倾向的影响:一种带有颜色暗示的安慰剂方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:589826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589826. eCollection 2020.
9
Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment.预包装食品营养信息是否能提高消费者做出健康选择的能力?在模拟购物实验中对警示语和红绿灯系统的效果评估。
Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.037. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.不同包装正面营养标签对消费者购买意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验
Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is Food Noise? A Conceptual Model of Food Cue Reactivity.什么是食物噪音?食物线索反应性的概念模型。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 17;15(22):4809. doi: 10.3390/nu15224809.
2
Neural mechanisms of expert persuasion on willingness to pay for sugar.专家对糖的支付意愿进行说服的神经机制。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Mar 13;17:1147140. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1147140. eCollection 2023.
3
"Expert persuasion" can decrease willingness to pay for sugar-containing food.“专家劝导”可降低对含糖食品的支付意愿。

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of a nutritional intervention using pictorial representations for promoting knowledge and practices of healthy eating among Brazilian adolescents.使用图片表示法进行营养干预对促进巴西青少年健康饮食知识和行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213277. eCollection 2019.
2
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
3
Front-of-package nutrition labelling policy: global progress and future directions.
Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 28;9:926875. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.926875. eCollection 2022.
4
Food Labeling: Analysis, Understanding, and Perception.食品标签:分析、理解与认知。
Nutrients. 2021 Jan 19;13(1):268. doi: 10.3390/nu13010268.
5
The influence of congruency proportion, target eccentricity, and valence strength on the spatial-valence metaphoric congruency effect in a word valence judgment task.在词汇判断任务中,一致比例、目标偏心率和效价强度对空间-效价隐喻一致性效应的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2610-2635. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01422-0. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
Evaluating Medical Devices Remotely: Current Methods and Potential Innovations.远程评估医疗器械:当前方法和潜在创新。
Hum Factors. 2020 Nov;62(7):1041-1060. doi: 10.1177/0018720820953644. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
包装正面营养标签政策:全球进展与未来方向
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jun;21(8):1399-1408. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000010. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial.营养标签是否会影响更健康的食物选择?一项标签干预试验中对标签查看行为及随后购买食品的分析。
Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:360-365. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.105. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Impact of explained v. unexplained front-of-package nutrition labels on parent and child food choices: a randomized trial.已解释的与未解释的包装正面营养标签对家长和儿童食品选择的影响:一项随机试验。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Apr;20(5):774-785. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002676. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Does the Australasian "Health Star Rating" Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?澳大利亚“健康星级评定”包装正面营养标签系统有效吗?
Nutrients. 2016 Jun 1;8(6):327. doi: 10.3390/nu8060327.
7
Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review.食物线索反应性和渴望可预测饮食及体重增加:一项荟萃分析综述。
Obes Rev. 2016 Feb;17(2):159-77. doi: 10.1111/obr.12354. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
Food as Risk: How Eating Habits and Food Knowledge Affect Reactivity to Pictures of Junk and Healthy Foods.食物即风险:饮食习惯与食物知识如何影响对垃圾食品和健康食品图片的反应
Health Commun. 2016;31(5):635-42. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.987098. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Nutrition Label Viewing during a Food-Selection Task: Front-of-Package Labels vs Nutrition Facts Labels.食物选择任务中的营养标签查看:包装正面标签与营养成分表标签
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Oct;115(10):1636-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Visual attention to food cues in obesity: an eye-tracking study.肥胖人群对食物线索的视觉注意力:一项眼动追踪研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Dec;22(12):2501-7. doi: 10.1002/oby.20884. Epub 2014 Sep 8.