College of Communication and Media Sciences, Zayed University.
Health Commun. 2021 Jun;36(7):837-846. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1719320. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
Given that many health problems in the United States are closely related to high sugar consumption, this research examined the effectiveness of ad forms (narrative vs. non-narrative) on persuading people to limit sugar intake through an online experiment completed by 1,104 participants. It was found that individual difference of regulatory focus moderated the effect of narrative vs. non-narrative advertising. Moreover, this study revealed an underlying mechanism of how audiences processed narrative vs. non-narrative advertising differently via the mediator of processing fluency, and further resulted in different advertising effectiveness. The findings contributed in providing implications for policy makers and ad professionals to help them with the improvement of public's health in the USA.
鉴于美国许多健康问题与高糖消耗密切相关,本研究通过一项由 1104 名参与者完成的在线实验,考察了广告形式(叙事与非叙事)在说服人们限制糖摄入量方面的效果。研究发现,调节焦点的个体差异调节了叙事与非叙事广告的效果。此外,本研究通过中介变量“加工流畅性”揭示了受众如何以不同的方式处理叙事与非叙事广告的潜在机制,从而导致不同的广告效果。这些发现为政策制定者和广告专业人士提供了启示,帮助他们改善美国公众的健康。