Golriz Khatami Sepehr, Robinson Christine, Birkenbihl Colin, Domingo-Fernández Daniel, Hoyt Charles Tapley, Hofmann-Apitius Martin
Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Jan 14;6:158. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00158. eCollection 2019.
Dementia-related diseases like Alzheimer's Disease (AD) have a tremendous social and economic cost. A deeper understanding of its underlying pathophysiologies may provide an opportunity for earlier detection and therapeutic intervention. Previous approaches for characterizing AD were targeted at single aspects of the disease. Yet, due to the complex nature of AD, the success of these approaches was limited. However, in recent years, advancements in integrative disease modeling, built on a wide range of AD biomarkers, have taken a global view on the disease, facilitating more comprehensive analysis and interpretation. Integrative AD models can be sorted in two primary types, namely hypothetical models and data-driven models. The latter group split into two subgroups: (i) Models that use traditional statistical methods such as linear models, (ii) Models that take advantage of more advanced artificial intelligence approaches such as machine learning. While many integrative AD models have been published over the last decade, their impact on clinical practice is limited. There exist major challenges in the course of integrative AD modeling, namely data missingness and censoring, imprecise human-involved priori knowledge, model reproducibility, dataset interoperability, dataset integration, and model interpretability. In this review, we highlight recent advancements and future possibilities of integrative modeling in the field of AD research, showcase and discuss the limitations and challenges involved, and finally, propose avenues to address several of these challenges.
像阿尔茨海默病(AD)这样与痴呆相关的疾病会带来巨大的社会和经济成本。对其潜在病理生理学的更深入理解可能为早期检测和治疗干预提供机会。以往表征AD的方法针对的是该疾病的单一方面。然而,由于AD的复杂性,这些方法的成效有限。不过,近年来,基于广泛的AD生物标志物构建的综合疾病建模取得了进展,对该疾病采取了全局视角,便于进行更全面的分析和解读。综合AD模型可分为两种主要类型,即假设模型和数据驱动模型。后一组又分为两个子组:(i)使用线性模型等传统统计方法的模型,(ii)利用机器学习等更先进人工智能方法的模型。尽管在过去十年中已经发表了许多综合AD模型,但它们对临床实践的影响有限。在综合AD建模过程中存在重大挑战,即数据缺失和删失、人为参与的先验知识不精确、模型可重复性、数据集互操作性、数据集整合以及模型可解释性。在本综述中,我们强调AD研究领域综合建模的最新进展和未来可能性,展示并讨论其中涉及的局限性和挑战,最后提出应对其中一些挑战的途径。