• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排放交易计划对产业结构升级是否存在溢出效应?基于 PSM-DID 方法的欧盟证据。

Does emission trading scheme have spillover effect on industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from the EU based on a PSM-DID approach.

机构信息

School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, No.96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, 230026, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12345-12357. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07818-0. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-07818-0
PMID:31993897
Abstract

The coordinated development of environmental pollution and the economy has become a global problem. Emission trading scheme (ETS) has become a significant environmental policy instrument, prior studies primarily concentrated on micro-level factors with specific industries; there lacks discussion on the effects of ETS on macro-level industrial structure such as industrial structure upgrading. In this paper, we first use the propensity score matching (PSM) to screen out the control group in which countries are matched with the members of the EU, and then utilize the difference-in-differences (DID) method, to examine the effects of ETS implementation on national industrial structure upgrading in the members of the EU. Empirical results show that the EU ETS may does not have a significant impact on industrial structure change, while the implementation of EU ETS has significantly promoted the upgrading of the country's industrial structure, and the policy effect of EU ETS on industrial structure upgrading gradually increases as time goes by and there is a dynamic effect. The conclusions of this paper can be used as reference for the development of emission reduction policies in large countries with unbalanced internal development.

摘要

环境污染与经济协调发展已成为全球性问题。排放交易计划(ETS)已成为一项重要的环境政策工具,先前的研究主要集中在具有特定行业的微观层面因素上,而对于 ETS 对宏观层面产业结构(如产业结构升级)的影响缺乏讨论。本文首先使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)筛选出与欧盟成员国相匹配的对照组国家,然后利用双重差分(DID)方法,检验 ETS 实施对欧盟成员国国家产业结构升级的影响。实证结果表明,欧盟 ETS 可能对产业结构变化没有显著影响,而欧盟 ETS 的实施显著促进了国家产业结构的升级,并且随着时间的推移,欧盟 ETS 对产业结构升级的政策效应逐渐增加,存在动态效应。本文的结论可以为发展中国家不平衡的内部发展减排政策的制定提供参考。

相似文献

1
Does emission trading scheme have spillover effect on industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from the EU based on a PSM-DID approach.排放交易计划对产业结构升级是否存在溢出效应?基于 PSM-DID 方法的欧盟证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12345-12357. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07818-0. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Innovation spillover effect of the pilot carbon emission trading policy in China.中国碳排放权交易试点政策的创新溢出效应
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):e20062. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20062. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Does the EU emissions trading system help reduce PM damage? A research based on PSM-DID method.欧盟排放交易体系有助于减少颗粒物损害吗?基于倾向得分匹配法和双重差分法的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(16):23129-23143. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17640-x. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
4
Digital economy drives regional industrial structure upgrading: Empirical evidence from China's comprehensive big data pilot zone policy.数字经济推动区域产业结构升级:来自中国综合大数据试验区政策的经验证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 8;18(12):e0295609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295609. eCollection 2023.
5
Carbon emission trading scheme and corporate labor cost: Evidence from China.碳排放交易计划与企业劳动力成本:来自中国的证据
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 10;10(14):e34465. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34465. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
6
Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China's Pilot Emission Trading Scheme.排放交易是否能提高碳生产力?来自中国试点排放交易计划的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155522.
7
The influence of environmental regulation on the FDI location choice of EU ETS-covered MNEs.环境规制对纳入欧盟排放交易体系的跨国公司外国直接投资区位选择的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 1;321:115839. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115839. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
8
How does the location of high-speed railway stations affect the emission reduction effect of industrial structure upgrading?高铁站的位置如何影响产业结构升级的减排效果?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):6106-6124. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31615-0. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
9
Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots.碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种有效的市场激励型环境监管政策吗?来自中国八个碳排放交易试点的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063177.
10
The effectiveness and heterogeneity of carbon emissions trading scheme in China.中国碳排放交易计划的有效性和异质性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(14):17306-17318. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12182-0. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of emission trading scheme on technological progress: A case study in China.排放交易计划对技术进步的影响:以中国为例的案例研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 1;10(1):e23126. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23126. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
2
Does globalization matter in the relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth, evidence from Asian emerging economies.全球化在可再生能源消费与经济增长之间的关系中是否重要,来自亚洲新兴经济体的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 16;18(8):e0289720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289720. eCollection 2023.
3
The effect exerted by environment regulation on industrial structure optimization: Evidence of 286 China's cities on the prefecture level.

本文引用的文献

1
Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change.在双重差分模型中使用倾向得分来估计政策变化的影响。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 1;14(4):166-182. doi: 10.1007/s10742-014-0123-z.
环境规制对产业结构优化的影响:基于中国286个地级市的证据
Heliyon. 2023 May 19;9(5):e16406. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16406. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Analysis of modern circulation industry development level using industrial structure mechanism.运用产业结构机理分析现代流通产业发展水平。
J Comb Optim. 2023;45(2):60. doi: 10.1007/s10878-022-00973-9. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Can the Policy of National Urban Agglomeration Improve Economic and Environmental Gains? Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiments with 280 Cities in China.城市群政策能否提高经济和环境效益?来自中国 280 个城市的准自然实验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7596. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137596.
6
The Impact of the Consistency Evaluation Policy of Generic Drugs on R&D Investment Intensity of Pharmaceutical Companies-An Empirical Study Based on the Difference-in-Differences Model.仿制药一致性评价政策对制药企业研发投入强度的影响——基于双重差分模型的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:902025. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902025. eCollection 2022.
7
Influence of UTCP on the employment of female workers and the supply of labor force.UTCP 对女性劳动者就业和劳动力供给的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0259843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259843. eCollection 2021.
8
Threshold Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Carbon Emissions Performance From the Perspective of Marketization Level: Implications for the Green Economy.市场化水平视角下外国直接投资与碳排放绩效的门槛效应:对绿色经济的启示
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 27;12:708749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708749. eCollection 2021.
9
An Analysis of the Impact of the Emissions Trading System on the Green Total Factor Productivity Based on the Spatial Difference-in-Differences Approach: The Case of China.基于空间双重差分法的排放交易体系对绿色全要素生产率的影响分析:以中国为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 27;18(17):9040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179040.
10
Does Environmental Policy Help Green Industry? Evidence from China's Promotion of Municipal Solid Waste Sorting.环境政策是否有助于绿色产业?来自中国推进城市固体废物分类的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):2799. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062799.