• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小农生态系统中的环境异质性与商品共享。

Environmental heterogeneity and commodity sharing in smallholder agroecosystems.

机构信息

Ostrom Workshop, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228021. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0228021
PMID:31995584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6988909/
Abstract

Smallholder farmers undertake a number of strategies to cope with climate shocks in a community. The sharing of resources across households constitutes one coping mechanism when environmental shocks differentially impact households. This paper investigates commodity sharing dynamics among households in eight communities in an environmentally heterogeneous highland-lowland area in central Kenya. We use survey data and meteorological data to test whether commodity sharing, measured at the household level by net inflow of commodities, varies across a regional precipitation gradient, and we reveal how sharing fluctuates with rainfall over the course of a year. We find both precipitation and income to be significant predictors of households' net value of shared commodities. Specifically, farmers who live in drier areas with less income are more likely to receive more commodities than they give. We also find that the length of time a household has been established in the area is significantly related to commodity sharing. Further, commodity sharing follows the pattern of harvest and food storage over the course of the year, with households giving the most commodities at times when food storage levels are higher, that is, post-harvest. The study sheds light on the relationship between commodity sharing as a coping mechanism and environmental heterogeneity in a region prone to seasonal food insecurity.

摘要

小农在社区中采取了许多策略来应对气候冲击。当环境冲击对家庭产生不同影响时,家庭之间资源的共享构成了一种应对机制。本文调查了肯尼亚中部一个环境异质的高地-低地地区的八个社区中家庭之间的商品共享动态。我们使用调查数据和气象数据来检验商品共享是否在区域降水梯度上有所不同,并用它来揭示共享如何随一年中的降水而波动。我们发现降水和收入都是家庭共享商品净价值的重要预测指标。具体来说,生活在降水较少、收入较低地区的农民更有可能收到比送出的商品多。我们还发现,家庭在该地区的建立时间长短与商品共享显著相关。此外,商品共享与一年中收获和粮食储存的模式一致,即在粮食储存水平较高的时候,也就是收获后,家庭会送出最多的商品。该研究揭示了作为应对机制的商品共享与易发生季节性粮食不安全地区环境异质性之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/dcf07e47b66f/pone.0228021.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/b05d8e9803ee/pone.0228021.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/449dbbea6b67/pone.0228021.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/0d345006e18d/pone.0228021.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/dcf07e47b66f/pone.0228021.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/b05d8e9803ee/pone.0228021.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/449dbbea6b67/pone.0228021.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/0d345006e18d/pone.0228021.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c60/6988909/dcf07e47b66f/pone.0228021.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental heterogeneity and commodity sharing in smallholder agroecosystems.小农生态系统中的环境异质性与商品共享。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228021. eCollection 2020.
2
A cross-country analysis of climate shocks and smallholder food insecurity.一项关于气候冲击与小农户粮食不安全状况的跨国分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192928. eCollection 2018.
3
A multi-country assessment of factors related to smallholder food security in varying rainfall conditions.对不同降雨条件下与小农粮食安全相关因素的多国评估。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 24;7(1):16277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16282-9.
4
Multiple pathways towards achieving a living income for different types of smallholder tree-crop commodity farmers.为不同类型的小农户树木作物商品种植者实现可持续生计收入的多种途径。
Food Secur. 2021;13(6):1467-1496. doi: 10.1007/s12571-021-01220-5. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Livestock and livelihoods of smallholder cattle-owning households in Cambodia: the contribution of on-farm and off-farm activities to income and food security.柬埔寨小农户养牛家庭的牲畜与生计:农业和非农业活动对收入及粮食安全的贡献。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018 Dec;50(8):1747-1761. doi: 10.1007/s11250-018-1615-6. Epub 2018 May 23.
6
The influence of an agricultural intervention on social capital and water insecurity coping strategies: Qualitative evidence from female smallholder farmers living with HIV in western Kenya.一项农业干预措施对社会资本及水资源不安全应对策略的影响:来自肯尼亚西部感染艾滋病毒的女性小农户的定性证据
Heliyon. 2024 May 29;10(11):e32058. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32058. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
7
Adaptation to drought in arid and semi-arid environments: Case of the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe.干旱和半干旱环境下对干旱的适应:以津巴布韦赞比西河谷为例。
Jamba. 2015 Mar 11;7(1):144. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v7i1.144. eCollection 2015.
8
Child malnutrition in poor smallholder households in rural Kenya: an in-depth situation analysis.肯尼亚农村贫困小农户中的儿童营养不良:深入情况分析
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995 Sep;49(9):691-702.
9
Determinants of access and utilisation of seasonal climate information services among smallholder farmers in Makueni County, Kenya.肯尼亚马库埃尼县小农户获取和利用季节性气候信息服务的决定因素
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 7;4(11):e00889. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00889. eCollection 2018 Nov.
10
Changing climate - Changing livelihood: Smallholder's perceptions and adaption strategies.气候变化-生计变化:小农的认知与适应策略。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 1;259:109702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109702. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Fruitful exchanges: social networks and food resources amidst change.富有成效的交流:变化中的社交网络与食物资源
Agric Food Secur. 2022;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40066-021-00342-5. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
Design principles for risk-pooling systems.风险池系统设计原则。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):825-833. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01121-9. Epub 2021 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing-based social capital associated with harvest production and wealth in the Canadian Arctic.分享型社会资本与加拿大北极地区的渔获和财富有关。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 12;13(3):e0193759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193759. eCollection 2018.
2
Multiplex social ecological network analysis reveals how social changes affect community robustness more than resource depletion.多重社会生态网络分析揭示了社会变化对社区稳健性的影响如何超过资源枯竭。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13708-13713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604401113. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Reciprocity on Demand : Sharing and Exchanging Food in Northwestern Namibia.
按需互惠:纳米比亚西北部的食物共享与交换
Hum Nat. 2015 Sep;26(3):313-30. doi: 10.1007/s12110-015-9236-5.
4
Adapting agriculture to climate change in Kenya: household strategies and determinants.肯尼亚适应气候变化的农业:家庭策略和决定因素。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.036. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Food-Sharing Networks in Lamalera, Indonesia: Status, Sharing, and Signaling.印度尼西亚拉马勒拉的食物共享网络:现状、共享与信号传递
Evol Hum Behav. 2012 Jul 1;33(4):334-345. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.11.003.
6
Adopting Cultivation to Remain Pastoralists: The Diversification of Maasai Livelihoods in Northern Tanzania.通过发展农牧业来维持牧民生活:坦桑尼亚北部马赛人生计的多样化
Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2010 Jun;38(3):321-334. doi: 10.1007/s10745-010-9312-8.
7
The Economic Lives of the Poor.穷人的经济生活。
J Econ Perspect. 2007;21(1):141-167. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.1.141.