Department of System Cybernetics, Graduate School of Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 739-8527, Japan.
Faculty of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-Ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):1422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57580-z.
General movements (GMs), a type of spontaneous movement, have been used for the early diagnosis of infant disorders. In clinical practice, GMs are visually assessed by qualified licensees; however, this presents a difficulty in terms of quantitative evaluation. Various measurement systems for the quantitative evaluation of GMs track target markers attached to infants; however, these markers may disturb infants' spontaneous movements. This paper proposes a markerless movement measurement and evaluation system for GMs in infants. The proposed system calculates 25 indices related to GMs, including the magnitude and rhythm of movements, by video analysis, that is, by calculating background subtractions and frame differences. Movement classification is performed based on the clinical definition of GMs by using an artificial neural network with a stochastic structure. This supports the assessment of GMs and early diagnoses of disabilities in infants. In a series of experiments, the proposed system is applied to movement evaluation and classification in full-term infants and low-birth-weight infants. The experimental results confirm that the average agreement between four GMs classified by the proposed system and those identified by a licensee reaches up to 83.1 ± 1.84%. In addition, the classification accuracy of normal and abnormal movements reaches 90.2 ± 0.94%.
总体运动(GMs)是一种自发性运动,已被用于婴儿疾病的早期诊断。在临床实践中,GMs 由合格的持照人进行视觉评估;然而,这在定量评估方面存在困难。各种用于定量评估 GMs 的测量系统通过跟踪附着在婴儿身上的目标标记来进行;然而,这些标记可能会干扰婴儿的自发性运动。本文提出了一种用于婴儿 GMs 的无标记运动测量和评估系统。该系统通过视频分析(即通过计算背景减法和帧差)计算与 GMs 相关的 25 个指标,包括运动的幅度和节奏。基于 GMs 的临床定义,使用具有随机结构的人工神经网络进行运动分类。这支持了 GMs 的评估和婴儿残疾的早期诊断。在一系列实验中,该系统被应用于足月婴儿和低出生体重婴儿的运动评估和分类。实验结果证实,该系统分类的 4 种 GMs 与持照人识别的 GMs 的平均一致性高达 83.1 ± 1.84%。此外,正常和异常运动的分类准确率达到 90.2 ± 0.94%。