Psyridou Maria, Tolvanen Asko, Lerkkanen Marja-Kristiina, Poikkeus Anna-Maija, Torppa Minna
Department of Teacher Education, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02841. eCollection 2019.
This study examined the stability of reading difficulties (RD) from grades 2 to 6 and focused on the effects of measurement error and cut-off selection in the identification of RD and its stability with the use of simulations. It addressed methodological limitations of prior studies by (a) applying a model-based simulation analysis to examine the effects of measurement error and cut-offs in the identification of RD, (b) analyzing a non-English and larger sample, and (c) examining RD in both reading fluency and reading comprehension. Reading fluency and reading comprehension of 1,432 Finnish-speaking children were assessed in grades 2 and 6. In addition to the use of single cut-off points on observed data, we used a simulation approach based on an estimated structural equation model (SEM) in order to examine the effect of measurement error on RD identification stability. We also examined the effect of single cut-offs by using a simulation-based buffer zone. Our results showed that measurement error affects the identification of RD over time. The use of a simulation-based buffer zone could control both the effects of measurement error and the arbitrariness of single cut-offs and lead to more accurate classification into RD groups, especially for those with scores close to the cut-offs. However, even after controlling for measurement error and using buffer zones, RD was not stable over time for all children, but both resolving and late-emerging groups existed. The findings suggest that reading development needs to be followed closely beyond the early grades and that reading instruction should be planned according to individual needs at specific time points. There is a clear need for further consideration of the mechanisms underlying the stability and instability of RD.
本研究考察了二年级至六年级阅读障碍(RD)的稳定性,并通过模拟研究了测量误差和临界值选择对阅读障碍识别及其稳定性的影响。该研究克服了以往研究的方法局限性:(a)应用基于模型的模拟分析来考察测量误差和临界值在阅读障碍识别中的影响;(b)分析了一个非英语的更大样本;(c)考察了阅读流畅性和阅读理解方面的阅读障碍。对1432名讲芬兰语儿童的阅读流畅性和阅读理解能力在二年级和六年级时进行了评估。除了在观测数据上使用单一临界值外,我们还使用了基于估计结构方程模型(SEM)的模拟方法,以考察测量误差对阅读障碍识别稳定性的影响。我们还通过基于模拟的缓冲区考察了单一临界值的影响。我们的结果表明,测量误差会随时间影响阅读障碍的识别。使用基于模拟的缓冲区可以控制测量误差的影响以及单一临界值的随意性,并能更准确地将学生分类到阅读障碍组,尤其是对于那些分数接近临界值的学生。然而,即使在控制了测量误差并使用缓冲区之后,并非所有儿童的阅读障碍随时间都是稳定的,而是存在消退组和后期出现组。研究结果表明,在小学低年级之后仍需密切关注阅读发展情况,并且应根据特定时间点的个体需求来规划阅读教学。显然需要进一步考虑阅读障碍稳定性和不稳定性背后的机制。