Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 31;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-1250-9.
In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, differentiating between patients with a low and a high risk of recurrence is an ongoing challenge. In current practice, prognostic clinical parameters are used for risk prediction. DNA methylation markers have been proven to be of additional prognostic value in several cancer types. Numerous prognostic DNA methylation markers for breast cancer have been published in the literature. However, to date, none of these markers are used in clinical practice.
We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE to assess the number and level of evidence of published DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To obtain an overview of the reporting quality of the included studies, all were scored according to the REMARK criteria that were established as reporting guidelines for prognostic biomarker studies.
A total of 74 studies were identified reporting on 87 different DNA methylation markers. Assessment of the REMARK criteria showed variation in reporting quality of the studies. Eighteen single markers and one marker panel were studied in multiple independent populations. Hypermethylation of the markers RASSF1, BRCA, PITX2, CDH1, RARB, PCDH10 and PGR, and the marker panel GSTP1, RASSF1 and RARB showed a statistically significant correlation with poor disease outcome that was confirmed in at least one other, independent study.
This systematic review provides an overview on published prognostic DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and identifies eight markers that have been independently validated. Analysis of the reporting quality of included studies suggests that future research on this topic would benefit from standardised reporting guidelines.
在激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者中,区分低复发风险和高复发风险的患者仍然是一个挑战。目前,临床预后参数被用于风险预测。DNA 甲基化标志物已被证明在多种癌症类型中具有额外的预后价值。已经有许多关于乳腺癌预后 DNA 甲基化标志物的文献发表。然而,迄今为止,这些标志物都没有在临床实践中使用。
我们对 PubMed 和 EMBASE 进行了系统综述,以评估已发表的用于激素受体阳性乳腺癌的 DNA 甲基化标志物的数量和证据水平。为了全面了解纳入研究的报告质量,所有研究都根据 REMARK 标准进行评分,该标准是为预后生物标志物研究制定的报告指南。
共确定了 74 项研究,报道了 87 个不同的 DNA 甲基化标志物。对 REMARK 标准的评估表明,研究报告质量存在差异。有 18 个单一标志物和一个标志物组合在多个独立人群中进行了研究。标志物 RASSF1、BRCA、PITX2、CDH1、RARB、PCDH10 和 PGR 的高甲基化以及标志物 GSTP1、RASSF1 和 RARB 的高甲基化与不良疾病结局呈统计学显著相关,并且在至少一项其他独立研究中得到了证实。
本系统综述提供了激素受体阳性乳腺癌已发表的预后 DNA 甲基化标志物的概述,并确定了 8 个已被独立验证的标志物。纳入研究报告质量的分析表明,未来关于该主题的研究将受益于标准化的报告指南。