Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Biomaterials and Biomechanics, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, United States.
Dent Mater. 2020 Mar;36(3):468-477. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the photoinitiator system on the polymerization kinetics of methacrylamide-based monomers as alternatives to methacrylates in adhesives dental-based materials.
In total, 16 groups were tested. Monofunctional monomers (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) - HEMA; (2-hydroxy-1-ethyl methacrylate) -2EMATE, (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylamide) - HEMAM; and (N-(1-hydroxybutan-2-yl) methacrylamide) -2EM; were combined with bifunctional monomers containing the same polymerizing moieties as the monofunctional counterparts (HEMA-BDI; 2EMATE-BDI; HEMAM-BDI; and 2EM-BDI) at 50/50 M ratios. BHT was used as inhibitor (0.1 wt%) and the photoinitiators used were: CQ + EDMAB (0.2/0.8), BAPO (0.2), IVOCERIN (0.2), and DMPA (0.2), in wt%. The polymerization kinetics were monitored using Near-IR spectroscopy (∼6165 cm) in real-time while the specimens were photoactivated with a mercury arc lamp (Acticure 2; 320-500 nm, 300 mW/cm) for 5 min, and maximum rate of polymerization (Rp, in %.s-̄), degree of conversion at Rp (DC@Rp, in %), and the final degree of conversion (Final DC, in %) were calculated (n = 3). Initial viscosity was measured with an oscillating rheometer (n = 3). Data were analyzed using Two-way ANOVA for the polymerization kinetics and one-way ANOVA for the viscosity. Multiple comparisons were made using the Tukey's test (∝ = 0.05).
There was statistically significant interaction between monomer and photoinitiator (p < 0.001). For the methacrylates groups, the highest Rp was observed for HEMA + DMPA and 2EMATE + BAPO. For methacrylamides groups, the highest Rp were observed for HEMAM and 2EM, both with DMPA. Final DC was higher for the methacrylate groups, in comparison with methacrylamide groups, independent of the photoinitiators. However, for the methacrylamide groups, the association with BAPO led to the lowest values of DC. In terms of DC@Rp, methacrylate-based systems showed significantly higher values than methacrylamide formulations. DMPA and Ivocerin led to higher values than CQ/EDMAB and BAPO in methacrylamide-based compounds. BAPO systems showed de lowest values for both HEMA and HEMAM formulations. For the viscosity (Pa.s), only 2EM had higher values (1.60 ± 0.15) in comparison with all monomers. In conclusion, polymerization kinetics was affected by the photoinitiators for both monomers. Viscosity was significantly increased with the use of secondary methacrylamide.
this work demonstrated the feasibility of using newly-synthesized methacrylamide monomers in conjunction with a series of initiator systems already used in commercial materials.
本研究旨在探讨光引发剂体系对基于丙烯酰胺的单体聚合动力学的影响,这些单体可作为胶粘剂牙科材料中甲基丙烯酸酯的替代品。
共测试了 16 组。将单官能单体(2-羟乙基甲基丙烯酸酯)-HEMA;(2-羟乙基甲基丙烯酰胺)-HEMAM;(2-羟基-1-乙基甲基丙烯酸酯)-2EMATE 和(N-(1-羟基丁基)甲基丙烯酰胺)-2EM 与含有与单官能单体相同聚合部分的双官能单体(HEMA-BDI;2EMATE-BDI;HEMAM-BDI 和 2EM-BDI)以 50/50 M 的比例结合。使用 BHT 作为抑制剂(0.1wt%),并使用以下光引发剂:CQ+EDMAB(0.2/0.8)、BAPO、IVOCERIN 和 DMPA(0.2wt%)。聚合动力学在实时使用近红外光谱(~6165cm)进行监测,同时用汞弧灯(Acticure 2;320-500nm,300mW/cm)对样品进行 5 分钟的光激活,计算最大聚合速率(Rp,%s-1)、Rp 时的转化率(DC@Rp,%)和最终转化率(Final DC,%)(n=3)。初始粘度用振荡流变仪测量(n=3)。聚合动力学采用双因素方差分析,粘度采用单因素方差分析。使用 Tukey 检验进行多重比较(∝=0.05)。
单体和光引发剂之间存在统计学上显著的相互作用(p<0.001)。对于甲基丙烯酸酯组,HEMA+DMPA 和 2EMATE+BAPO 观察到最高的 Rp。对于丙烯酰胺组,HEMAM 和 2EM 与 DMPA 结合观察到最高的 Rp。与丙烯酰胺组相比,甲基丙烯酸酯组的最终 DC 更高,而与光引发剂无关。然而,对于丙烯酰胺组,与 BAPO 结合导致 DC 值最低。在 DC@Rp 方面,基于甲基丙烯酸酯的体系显示出比基于丙烯酰胺的制剂更高的值。在基于丙烯酰胺的化合物中,DMPA 和 Ivocerin 比 CQ/EDMAB 和 BAPO 导致更高的 DC 值。BAPO 体系对 HEMA 和 HEMAM 制剂均表现出最低的 DC 值。对于粘度(Pa.s),只有 2EM 与所有单体相比具有更高的值(1.60±0.15)。综上所述,聚合动力学受到两种单体的光引发剂的影响。使用二级丙烯酰胺会显著增加粘度。
本工作证明了在商业材料中已使用的一系列引发剂体系的基础上使用新合成的丙烯酰胺单体的可行性。