• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生与医疗保健指南制定和实施中利益相关者参与指南制定的指导方针制定议定书。

Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation.

机构信息

Bruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care and University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Ave East, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 1;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5
PMID:32007104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6995157/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stakeholder engagement has become widely accepted as a necessary component of guideline development and implementation. While frameworks for developing guidelines express the need for those potentially affected by guideline recommendations to be involved in their development, there is a lack of consensus on how this should be done in practice. Further, there is a lack of guidance on how to equitably and meaningfully engage multiple stakeholders. We aim to develop guidance for the meaningful and equitable engagement of multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation.

METHODS

This will be a multi-stage project. The first stage is to conduct a series of four systematic reviews. These will (1) describe existing guidance and methods for stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (2) characterize barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (3) explore the impact of stakeholder engagement on guideline development and implementation, and (4) identify issues related to conflicts of interest when engaging multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation.

DISCUSSION

We will collaborate with our multiple and diverse stakeholders to develop guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation. We will use the results of the systematic reviews to develop a candidate list of draft guidance recommendations and will seek broad feedback on the draft guidance via an online survey of guideline developers and external stakeholders. An invited group of representatives from all stakeholder groups will discuss the results of the survey at a consensus meeting which will inform the development of the final guidance papers. Our overall goal is to improve the development of guidelines through meaningful and equitable multi-stakeholder engagement, and subsequently to improve health outcomes and reduce inequities in health.

摘要

背景

利益相关者的参与已被广泛认为是制定和实施指南的必要组成部分。虽然制定指南的框架表达了需要让那些可能受到指南建议影响的人参与到指南的制定中来,但在实践中如何做到这一点却缺乏共识。此外,对于如何公平、有意义地让多个利益相关者参与进来,也缺乏指导。我们的目标是为多利益相关者在指南制定和实施中的公平和有意义的参与制定指导意见。

方法

这将是一个多阶段的项目。第一阶段是进行一系列四项系统评价。这些系统评价将(1)描述指南制定和实施中利益相关者参与的现有指导意见和方法,(2)描述指南制定和实施中利益相关者参与的障碍和促进因素,(3)探讨利益相关者参与对指南制定和实施的影响,(4)确定在指南制定和实施中涉及多个利益相关者的利益冲突相关问题。

讨论

我们将与我们的多方面、多元化的利益相关者合作,制定多利益相关者参与指南制定和实施的指导意见。我们将利用系统评价的结果来制定一份候选指导建议草案,并通过对指南制定者和外部利益相关者进行在线调查,广泛征求对草案的意见。一个由来自所有利益相关者群体的代表组成的受邀小组将在共识会议上讨论调查结果,该会议将为最终指导文件的制定提供信息。我们的总体目标是通过公平、有意义的多利益相关者参与来改进指南的制定,并随后改善健康结果和减少健康方面的不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3c7/6995157/0c7ce4b88573/13643_2020_1272_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3c7/6995157/0c7ce4b88573/13643_2020_1272_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3c7/6995157/0c7ce4b88573/13643_2020_1272_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation.卫生与医疗保健指南制定和实施中利益相关者参与指南制定的指导方针制定议定书。
Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 1;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5.
2
PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.方案:利益相关者参与健康指南制定的障碍与促进因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 25;18(2):e1237. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1237. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement.用于参与的GIN-麦克马斯特指南制定清单扩展版
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May;181:111727. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111727. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
4
Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review.参与健康指南制定的指导意见:一项范围综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 25;20(4):e70006. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70006. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
GRADE Concept Paper 1: Validating the "F.A.C.E" instrument using stakeholder perceptions of feasibility, acceptability, cost, and equity in guideline implement.GRADE 概念论文 1:使用利益相关者对指南实施的可行性、可接受性、成本和公平性的看法来验证“F.A.C.E”工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;131:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
7
Lessons for the UK on implementation and evaluation of breastfeeding support: evidence syntheses and stakeholder engagement.英国在实施和评估母乳喂养支持方面的经验教训:证据综合和利益相关者参与。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(20):1-206. doi: 10.3310/DGTP5702.
8
Protocol for the development of guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses.合作方和伙伴参与医疗保健证据综合指南制定的方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 2;12(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02279-1.
9
Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.利益相关者参与共同制定与政策相关的知识,以促进发展性残疾人士的就业。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00548-2.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Improving shared decision-making in bronchiectasis.改善支气管扩张症中的共同决策。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Sep 3;12(1):e003049. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003049.
2
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.改进观察性研究中健康公平性的报告(STROBE-公平性):扩展清单及阐述
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
3
Transforming multi-stakeholder engagement towards coproduction of optimized maternal, newborn, and child health and a resilient community health system in rural Ethiopia: A qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews.用于描述利益相关者参与系统评价的ACTIVE框架的开发。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Oct;24(4):245-255. doi: 10.1177/1355819619841647. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
2
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research.利益相关者参与健康研究实用指南
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):458-463. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4738-6. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review.利益相关者参与系统评价:范围综述。
在埃塞俄比亚农村地区将多利益相关方参与转变为共同生产优化的孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康及具有韧性的社区卫生系统:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0330159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330159. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluation of guidelines on antimicrobials use in food-producing animals: a systematic review.食品生产动物抗菌药物使用指南的评估:一项系统综述。
One Health Outlook. 2025 Aug 14;7(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s42522-025-00160-w.
5
Achieving universal coverage of childhood cancers in Ghana via the National Health Insurance Scheme: A stakeholder analysis.通过国家健康保险计划实现加纳儿童癌症的全民覆盖:利益相关者分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 21;5(7):e0004871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004871. eCollection 2025.
6
Methodological and reporting quality of Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand clinical guidance documents.澳大利亚和新西兰胸科学会临床指南文件的方法学与报告质量。
Intern Med J. 2025 Aug;55(8):1367-1376. doi: 10.1111/imj.70090. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
7
People with dementia and informal caregivers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to implementing a behavioral activation intervention: a qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory.痴呆症患者及非正式照护者对实施行为激活干预的障碍和促进因素的认知:一项运用规范化过程理论的定性研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jun 11;25(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06087-1.
8
The equity group: Supporting Cochrane's social responsibility of improving health equity.公平性小组:支持Cochrane改善健康公平性的社会责任。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 May 15;1(3):e12012. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12012. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Developing an Integrated Service Planning Tool: Lessons Learnt from Planning the WSLHD Thoracic Oncology Program.开发综合服务规划工具:从规划西悉尼地方卫生区胸科肿瘤项目中吸取的经验教训。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Apr 22;25(2):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8976. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
10
Enhancing health equity considerations in guidelines: health equity extension of the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist.在指南中强化健康公平考量:GIN-麦克马斯特指南制定清单的健康公平扩展版
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar 28;82:103135. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103135. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 24;7(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0852-0.
4
Engaging knowledge users in development of the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews.让知识使用者参与《CONSORT-Equity 2017报告指南》的制定:一项采用深度访谈的定性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 22;4:34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0118-y. eCollection 2018.
5
How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research.如何将患者和公众的观点纳入研究的设计与实施过程中。
F1000Res. 2018 Jun 18;7:752. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15162.1. eCollection 2018.
6
Patient involvement in guidelines is poor five years after institute of medicine standards: review of guideline methodologies.在医学研究所制定标准五年后,患者在指南中的参与度仍然很低:指南方法学综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Oct 2;3:19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0070-2. eCollection 2017.
7
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
8
Incorporating patients' views in guideline development: a systematic review of guidance documents.将患者观点纳入指南制定:对指导文件的系统评价
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
9
The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence.GRADE工作组对证据确定性的概念进行了澄清。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;87:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: equity extension of the guideline development checklist.GRADE公平性指南2:在GRADE指南制定中考虑健康公平性:指南制定清单的公平性扩展
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 May 9.