Clinic of Pulmonary Medicine and Pulmonary Cell Research, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, CH, Switzerland.
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 1;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4793-6.
The identification of the pathogens in pleural effusion has mainly relied on conventional bacterial culture or single species polymerase chain reaction (PCR), both with relatively low sensitivity. We investigated the efficacy of a commercially available multiplex bacterial PCR assay developed for pneumonia to identify the pathogens involved in pleural infection, particularly empyema.
A prospective, monocentric, observational study including 194 patients with pleural effusion. Patients were evaluated based on imaging, laboratory values, pleura ultrasound and results of thoracentesis including conventional microbiology studies during hospitalisation. Multiplex bacterial PCR (Curetis Unyvero p55) was performed in batch and had no influence on therapeutic decisions.
Overall, there were 51/197 cases with transudate and 146/197 with exudate. In 42% (n = 90/214) there was a clinical suspicion of parapneumonic effusion and the final clinical diagnosis of empyema was made in 29% (n = 61/214) of all cases. The most common microorganisms identified in the cases diagnosed with empyema were anaerobes [31] followed by gram-positive cocci [10] and gram-negative rods [4]. The multiplex PCR assay identified more of the pathogens on the panel than the conventional methods (23.3% (7/30) vs. 6.7% (2/30), p = 0.008).
The multiplex PCR-based assay had a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional microbiology when only the pathogens on the pneumonia panel were taken into account. A dedicated pleural empyema multiplex PCR panel including anaerobes would be needed to cover most common pathogens involved in pleural infection.
胸腔积液中的病原体的鉴定主要依赖于传统的细菌培养或单一物种聚合酶链反应(PCR),这两种方法的敏感性相对较低。我们研究了一种商业上可用于肺炎的多重细菌 PCR 检测方法,以鉴定胸腔感染(尤其是脓胸)相关的病原体。
这是一项前瞻性、单中心、观察性研究,纳入了 194 例胸腔积液患者。患者在住院期间通过影像学、实验室值、胸腔超声和胸腔穿刺结果(包括常规微生物学研究)进行评估。多重细菌 PCR(Curetis Unyvero p55)在一批次中进行,对治疗决策没有影响。
总体而言,有 51/197 例为漏出液,146/197 例为渗出液。42%(90/214)的患者有类肺炎性胸腔积液的临床疑诊,最终临床诊断为脓胸的占所有病例的 29%(61/214)。在诊断为脓胸的病例中,最常见的微生物是厌氧菌[31],其次是革兰阳性球菌[10]和革兰阴性杆菌[4]。与传统方法相比,多重 PCR 检测方法在检测肺炎检测面板上的病原体时具有更高的敏感性和特异性(23.3%(7/30)vs. 6.7%(2/30),p=0.008)。
当仅考虑肺炎检测面板上的病原体时,基于多重 PCR 的检测方法比传统微生物学具有更高的敏感性和特异性。需要一种专门的脓胸多重 PCR 检测面板,包括厌氧菌,以覆盖胸腔感染中涉及的大多数常见病原体。