Sánchez-Rodríguez Antonio R, Hill Paul W, Chadwick David R, Jones Davey L
School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW UK.
Biol Fertil Soils. 2017;53(7):751-765. doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1214-0. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
Extreme flood events are predicted to have a negative impact on soil quality. Currently, there is a lack of information about the effect of agricultural practices on soil functioning and microbial processes under these events. We hypothesized that the impact of flooding on soil quality will be exacerbated when crop residues are present in the soil as they will induce more extreme anaerobicity. A spring extreme flood event (10 °C, 9 weeks) was simulated in mesocosms containing an arable sandy-loam soil low in nutrients. The main treatments were (1) with and without flooding and (2) with and without maize residue addition (8 Mg ha). We monitored changes in soil chemical quality indicators (e.g. pH, salinity, Fe, P, C, NH , NO and organic N), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (CO, CH, NO) and soil microbial community composition (PLFAs) during a prolonged flood period (9 weeks) and an 8-week "recovery" period after flooding. In comparison to the other treatments, flooding in the presence of crop residues resulted in a dramatic drop in soil redox potential. This was associated with the enhanced release of Fe and C into solution and an increase in CH emissions. In contrast, maize residues reduced potential nitrate losses and NO emissions, possibly due to complete denitrification and microbial N immobilization. Both flooding and maize residues stimulated microbial growth and promoted a shift in microbial community composition. Following floodwater removal, most of the soil quality indicators returned to the levels of the control treatment within 5 weeks. After this short recovery phase, no major impact of flooding could be observed on plant growth (maize pot-grown). Overall, we conclude that both extreme flooding and management regime negatively impact upon a range of soil quality indicators (e.g. redox, GHG emissions); however, the soil showed high resilience and recovered quickly after floodwater removal. Further work is required to investigate the impact of repeated extreme flood events on soil quality and function over longer timescales.
预计极端洪水事件会对土壤质量产生负面影响。目前,关于在这些事件下农业实践对土壤功能和微生物过程影响的信息还很缺乏。我们假设,当土壤中存在作物残茬时,洪水对土壤质量的影响会加剧,因为它们会导致更极端的厌氧状态。在含有低养分的可耕性砂壤土的中宇宙中模拟了一次春季极端洪水事件(10℃,9周)。主要处理方式为:(1)有洪水和无洪水;(2)添加和不添加玉米残茬(8 Mg·ha)。在长时间的洪水期(9周)和洪水后的8周“恢复期”内,我们监测了土壤化学质量指标(如pH值、盐度、铁、磷、碳、铵、硝酸盐和有机氮)、温室气体(GHG)排放(二氧化碳、甲烷、一氧化二氮)以及土壤微生物群落组成(磷脂脂肪酸)的变化。与其他处理方式相比,有作物残茬时的洪水导致土壤氧化还原电位急剧下降。这与铁和碳向溶液中的释放增加以及甲烷排放增加有关。相反,玉米残茬减少了潜在的硝酸盐损失和一氧化二氮排放,这可能是由于完全反硝化作用和微生物对氮的固定。洪水和玉米残茬都刺激了微生物生长,并促进了微生物群落组成的转变。洪水退去后,大多数土壤质量指标在5周内恢复到对照处理的水平。在这个短暂的恢复期之后,未观察到洪水对植物生长(盆栽玉米)有重大影响。总体而言,我们得出结论,极端洪水和管理方式都会对一系列土壤质量指标(如氧化还原、温室气体排放)产生负面影响;然而,土壤表现出高恢复力,洪水退去后迅速恢复。需要进一步开展工作,以研究在更长时间尺度上反复发生的极端洪水事件对土壤质量和功能的影响。