• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线哮喘控制问卷和哮喘生活质量问卷的验证

Validation of online Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.

作者信息

Khusial Rishi J, Honkoop Persijn J, van der Meer Victor, Snoeck-Stroband Jiska B, Sont Jacob K

机构信息

Dept of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2020 Jan 27;6(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00289-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan.

DOI:10.1183/23120541.00289-2019
PMID:32010723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6983500/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several newly developed eHealth applications use online questionnaires to monitor asthma control. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) are two such commonly used questionnaires. These questionnaires are validated for use on paper. This study aims to validate them by assessing the agreement between online and paper versions of the ACQ and AQLQ.

METHODS

Patients (aged 18 years and older) from the Self-Management in Asthma Supported by Hospitals, ICT, Nurses and General Practitioners (SMASHING)-trial and Davos@home study were included in this study. Patients completed both the paper and online Dutch versions of the ACQ and AQLQ in a random order within a 2-week interval. Agreement between the different versions was assessed with paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

In total 44 patients were eligible for analysis. The mean difference between the paper and online versions of the ACQ was 0.04 (p=0.40) and for the AQLQ it was 0.08 (p=0.06). The intraclass correlation coefficient scores were 0.94 for the ACQ and 0.95 for the AQLQ.

CONCLUSION

The online versions of the ACQ and AQLQ show high levels of agreement with the paper versions and can therefore be safely used in eHealth applications to respectively monitor asthma control and quality of life.

摘要

目的

几种新开发的电子健康应用程序使用在线问卷来监测哮喘控制情况。哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)和哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)就是两种常用的问卷。这些问卷在纸质版上已得到验证。本研究旨在通过评估ACQ和AQLQ在线版与纸质版之间的一致性来对其进行验证。

方法

本研究纳入了来自“医院、信息通信技术、护士和全科医生支持的哮喘自我管理”(SMASHING)试验和达沃斯家庭研究中的患者(年龄在18岁及以上)。患者在2周内以随机顺序完成了ACQ和AQLQ的纸质版和荷兰语在线版。使用配对t检验、组内相关系数和布兰德-奥特曼图评估不同版本之间的一致性。

结果

共有44名患者符合分析条件。ACQ纸质版和在线版之间的平均差异为0.04(p = 0.40),AQLQ的平均差异为0.08(p = 0.06)。ACQ的组内相关系数得分是0.94,AQLQ是0.95。

结论

ACQ和AQLQ的在线版与纸质版显示出高度一致性,因此可以安全地用于电子健康应用程序中,分别监测哮喘控制情况和生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9769/6983500/50d6e3cedadc/00289-2019.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9769/6983500/c6aa436290e4/00289-2019.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9769/6983500/a3ce2525e857/00289-2019.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9769/6983500/50d6e3cedadc/00289-2019.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9769/6983500/c6aa436290e4/00289-2019.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9769/6983500/a3ce2525e857/00289-2019.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9769/6983500/50d6e3cedadc/00289-2019.03.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of online Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.在线哮喘控制问卷和哮喘生活质量问卷的验证
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Jan 27;6(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00289-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan.
2
Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study.哮喘控制问卷在线自我管理版与访谈员管理版的比较:一项横断面验证研究。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Sep;22(3):284-9. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00041.
3
Validation of the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ-UK English version) in Indian asthmatic subjects.哮喘患者生活质量问卷(英国英语版)在印度哮喘患者中的验证
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2005 Jul-Sep;47(3):167-73.
4
Validation of online version of asthma control questionnaire in pediatric patients.哮喘控制问卷在线版本在儿科患者中的验证。
J Asthma. 2023 Aug;60(8):1553-1557. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2158859. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
5
Magnitude of effect of asthma treatments on Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.哮喘治疗对哮喘生活质量问卷和哮喘控制问卷评分影响的幅度:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;136(4):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 May 1.
6
Patients may respond differently to paper and electronic versions of the same questionnaires.患者对同一问卷的纸质版和电子版可能会有不同的反应。
Respir Med. 2009 Jun;103(6):932-4. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.10.019. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
7
Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire.哮喘控制问卷三个简化版本的测量属性及解读
Respir Med. 2005 May;99(5):553-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.10.008. Epub 2004 Nov 26.
8
Brief questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes in asthma: validation and usefulness in a primary care setting.哮喘患者报告结局的简短问卷:在初级保健环境中的验证及实用性
Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):925-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.925.
9
Electronic versus paper questionnaires: a further comparison in persons with asthma.电子问卷与纸质问卷:哮喘患者的进一步比较
J Asthma. 2003;40(7):751-62. doi: 10.1081/jas-120023501.
10
[Assessment of the simplified versions of the Asthma Control Questionnaire].[哮喘控制问卷简化版的评估]
Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Sep 20;131(9):326-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5 receptor therapy significantly improves quality of life and FEV1 values in patients with severe asthma.抗白细胞介素-5(IL-5)及抗白细胞介素-5受体疗法可显著改善重度哮喘患者的生活质量及第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)值。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2025 Aug 13;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13223-025-00979-y.
2
Early benefit of mepolizumab on small airways in severe asthma: insights from the IMPOSE study.美泊利珠单抗对重度哮喘患者小气道的早期疗效:来自IMPOSE研究的见解
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jun 23;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00939-2024. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the self evaluation of breathing questionnaire (SEBQ) into Danish.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on mHealth for asthma self-management.患者和医疗保健专业人员对哮喘自我管理的移动医疗的看法。
Eur Respir J. 2017 May 1;49(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01966-2016. Print 2017 May.
2
Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective.哮喘支持性自我管理的系统综述:医疗保健视角
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 17;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7.
3
MyAirCoach: the use of home-monitoring and mHealth systems to predict deterioration in asthma control and the occurrence of asthma exacerbations; study protocol of an observational study.
将呼吸问卷自我评估量表(SEBQ)翻译成丹麦语并进行跨文化调适。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2024 Nov 9;11(1):2413318. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2024.2413318. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing the Impact of Non-Exhaust Emissions on the Asthmatic Airway (IONA) Protocol for a Randomised Three-Exposure Crossover Study.评估非尾气排放物对哮喘气道的影响(IONA)——一项随机三暴露交叉研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 9;21(7):895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070895.
5
Risk factor analysis and nomogram for predicting poor symptom control in smoking asthmatics.吸烟哮喘患者症状控制不佳的风险因素分析和列线图预测。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jun 1;24(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03076-9.
6
Inflammatory markers in world trade center workers with asthma: Associations with post traumatic stress disorder.世贸中心哮喘工人中的炎症标志物:与创伤后应激障碍的关联。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 13;19(2):e0297616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297616. eCollection 2024.
7
Sanya climatic-treatment cohort profile: objectives, design, and baseline characteristics.三亚气候治疗队列研究概况:研究目的、设计及基线特征。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 19;11:1290303. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1290303. eCollection 2023.
8
Workup of difficult-to-treat asthma: implications from treatable traits.难治性哮喘的检查:可治疗特征的影响
Precis Clin Med. 2023 Feb 24;6(1):pbad003. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbad003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Targeting TSLP in Asthma.靶向哮喘中的胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素(TSLP)
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Jun 3;15:749-765. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S275039. eCollection 2022.
10
Measuring respiratory symptoms in moderate/severe asthma: evaluation of a respiratory symptom tool, the E-RS®: COPD in asthma populations.评估中重度哮喘患者的呼吸道症状:一种呼吸道症状评估工具——E-RS®的评价:哮喘人群中的慢性阻塞性肺疾病
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Oct 10;5(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00338-6.
MyAirCoach:利用家庭监测和移动健康系统预测哮喘控制情况恶化及哮喘急性发作的发生;一项观察性研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 24;7(1):e013935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013935.
4
Digital asthma self-management interventions: a systematic review.数字化哮喘自我管理干预措施:一项系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 18;16(2):e51. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2814.
5
Failure in asthma control: reasons and consequences.哮喘控制不佳:原因与后果
Scientifica (Cairo). 2013;2013:549252. doi: 10.1155/2013/549252. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
6
Long-term outcomes of internet-based self-management support in adults with asthma: randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的成人哮喘自我管理支持的长期结果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 12;15(9):e188. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2640.
7
Validation and psychometric properties of the Asthma Control Questionnaire among children.儿童哮喘控制问卷的验证和心理测量特性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jan;133(1):91-7.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
Comparison between an online self-administered and an interviewer-administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire: a cross-sectional validation study.哮喘控制问卷在线自我管理版与访谈员管理版的比较:一项横断面验证研究。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Sep;22(3):284-9. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00041.
9
Accuracy of patient self-report as a measure of inhaled asthma medication use.患者自我报告作为吸入性哮喘药物使用的衡量标准的准确性。
Respirology. 2013 Apr;18(3):546-52. doi: 10.1111/resp.12059.
10
Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial.手机支持的哮喘自我监测的临床和成本效益:多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2012 Mar 23;344:e1756. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1756.