Bushnell D M, Martin M L, Parasuraman B
Health Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Asthma. 2003;40(7):751-62. doi: 10.1081/jas-120023501.
The use of electronic data capture (EDC) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using validated questionnaires is increasing; however, it must be determined how data collected electronically correlate with the original mode of administration used in validation. Our objective was to compare paper and electronic administration of the standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)), Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ(S)), and Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ). Using a crossover design, adults and children with asthma and caregivers of children with asthma were recruited from clinics. Subjects were asked to complete both forms of the appropriate HRQOL measures at enrollment and 24-48 hours later. In addition, 30 subjects from each group were asked to participate in a 1-week reproducibility assessment of the electronic versions of the three questionnaires. Psychometric properties were assessed for each of the EDC versions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Pearson correlations were calculated to compare EDC and paper versions. A total of 51 adults (mean age 37, 73% females), 52 children (mean age 13, 38% females), and 51 caregivers (mean age 43, 92% females) were evaluated. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the overall score of each questionnaire was: 0.96 for the AQLQ(S) and the PAQLQ(S), and 0.92 for the PACQLQ. Overall ICCs comparing paper with EDC were: 0.96 for the AQLQ(S), 0.91 for the PAQLQ(S), and 0.82 for the PACQLQ. Pearson's correlations were identical. One-week reproducibility (ICC) of the EDC versions was: 0.88 for the AQLQ(S), 0.78 for the PAQLQ(S), and 0.85 for the PACQLQ. When asked which method subjects preferred, the electronic version was chosen by 69% of adults, 77% of children, and 73% of caregivers. Additionally, 14% of adults, 14% of children, and 18% of caregivers reported no difference in preference. As in previous studies comparing electronic with paper questionnaires, this study revealed statistical evidence to support the use of EDC of the AQLQ(S), PAQLQ(S), and PACQLQ for populations with asthma.
使用经过验证的问卷通过电子数据采集(EDC)来评估健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的情况正在增加;然而,必须确定以电子方式收集的数据与验证中使用的原始施测方式之间的相关性。我们的目的是比较标准化哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ(S))、儿童哮喘生活质量问卷(PAQLQ(S))和儿童哮喘照顾者生活质量问卷(PACQLQ)的纸质版和电子版施测情况。采用交叉设计,从诊所招募患有哮喘的成人和儿童以及患有哮喘儿童的照顾者。受试者被要求在入组时和24 - 48小时后完成两种形式的适当HRQOL测量。此外,每组30名受试者被要求参与对这三份问卷电子版的为期1周的重复性评估。对每个EDC版本的心理测量特性进行了评估。计算组内相关系数(ICC)和Pearson相关系数以比较EDC版本和纸质版。总共评估了51名成人(平均年龄37岁,73%为女性)、52名儿童(平均年龄13岁,38%为女性)和51名照顾者(平均年龄43岁,92%为女性)。每份问卷总体得分的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)为:AQLQ(S)和PAQLQ(S)为0.96,PACQLQ为0.92。比较纸质版和EDC版的总体ICC分别为:AQLQ(S)为0.96,PAQLQ(S)为0.91,PACQLQ为0.82。Pearson相关系数相同。EDC版本的1周重复性(ICC)分别为:AQLQ(S)为0.88,PAQLQ(S)为0.78,PACQLQ为0.85。当被问及受试者更喜欢哪种方法时,69%的成人、77%的儿童和73%的照顾者选择了电子版。此外,14%的成人、14%的儿童和18%的照顾者表示没有偏好差异。与之前比较电子问卷和纸质问卷的研究一样,本研究揭示了支持对哮喘患者群体使用AQLQ(S)、PAQLQ(S)和PACQLQ的EDC方式的统计学证据。