• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗反流黏膜切除术带治疗难治性胃食管反流病:安全性、可行性及症状控制的初步研究

Antireflux mucosectomy band in treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study for safety, feasibility and symptom control.

作者信息

Monino Laurent, Gonzalez Jean-Michel, Vitton Véronique, Barthet Marc

机构信息

Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Université catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2020 Feb;8(2):E147-E154. doi: 10.1055/a-1038-4012. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1055/a-1038-4012
PMID:32010747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6976317/
Abstract

Antireflux mucosectomy band ligation (ARM-b) is an endoscopic procedure that mimics a fundoplication for managing gastroesophoageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to assess safety and feasibility of ARM-b.  This was a single-center study on consecutive patients operated between June 2017 and January 2019 with refractory GERD, confirmed with pH-metry and without motility disorder at high-resolution manometry. A piecemeal mucosectomy of three quarters of circumference of esophagogastric junction was performed using a band ligation system and a hexagonal snare. The primary objective was to assess procedural safety and feasibility. The secondary objective was to document the clinical improvement at 3 and 6 months based on patient satisfaction, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake, symptoms, and quality of life scores.  Twenty-onepatients (11 men) with mean age 56.9 ± 14.4 years were analyzed. The technical success rate was 100 % (mean duration 35 ± 11 min). Four patients (19 %) had mild adverse events: one delayed bleeding at Day 1 managed conservatively, and three dysphagia endoscopically managed. Mean follow-up was 10 ± 5 months. Decrease/discontinuation of PPI intake was 76 % at 3 months and 72 % at 6 months. Improvement in mean symptoms and quality of life scores (GERD-Q and GERD-HQL) were statistically significant. One patient required laparoscopic fundoplication after ARM-b failure without complication.  ARM-b is safe, feasible, and symptom-effective for treating refractory GERD, and it can be performed in the ambulatory setting. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these promising outcomes.

摘要

抗反流黏膜切除术联合套扎术(ARM-b)是一种内镜手术,可模拟胃底折叠术来治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)。本研究旨在评估ARM-b的安全性和可行性。这是一项单中心研究,纳入了2017年6月至2019年1月间连续接受手术治疗的难治性GERD患者,通过pH测定法确诊,高分辨率测压法未发现动力障碍。使用套扎系统和六边形圈套器对食管胃交界部四分之三周长进行分步黏膜切除术。主要目的是评估手术的安全性和可行性。次要目的是根据患者满意度、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)摄入量、症状及生活质量评分记录3个月和6个月时的临床改善情况。分析了21例患者(11例男性),平均年龄56.9±14.4岁。技术成功率为100%(平均持续时间35±11分钟)。4例患者(19%)出现轻度不良事件:1例术后第1天出现延迟出血,保守治疗;3例吞咽困难,经内镜治疗。平均随访时间为10±5个月。3个月时PPI摄入量减少/停用率为76%,6个月时为72%。平均症状和生活质量评分(GERD-Q和GERD-HQL)改善具有统计学意义。1例患者在ARM-b失败后接受腹腔镜胃底折叠术,无并发症。ARM-b治疗难治性GERD安全、可行且症状有效,可在门诊进行。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些有前景的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/6d57bca64c3c/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/6ab2a8bb1151/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/4e7f833f746b/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/1fddc15a2e42/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/9408098a4685/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/161dbef9909c/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/6d57bca64c3c/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/6ab2a8bb1151/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/4e7f833f746b/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/1fddc15a2e42/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/9408098a4685/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/161dbef9909c/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d22/6976317/6d57bca64c3c/10-1055-a-1038-4012-i1672ei6.jpg

相似文献

1
Antireflux mucosectomy band in treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study for safety, feasibility and symptom control.抗反流黏膜切除术带治疗难治性胃食管反流病:安全性、可行性及症状控制的初步研究
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Feb;8(2):E147-E154. doi: 10.1055/a-1038-4012. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Antireflux Mucosectomy Band (ARM-b) in Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Bariatric Surgery.抗反流黏膜切除术带(ARM-b)治疗肥胖症手术后难治性胃食管反流病。
Obes Surg. 2020 Nov;30(11):4654-4658. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04753-4. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Pilot study on anti-reflux mucoplasty: Advancing endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜成形术的初步研究:推进内镜下胃食管反流病抗反流治疗
Dig Endosc. 2024 Jun;36(6):690-698. doi: 10.1111/den.14711. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
4
Antireflux band mucosectomy: a novel minimally invasive approach for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流带黏膜切除术:一种治疗难治性胃食管反流病的新型微创方法。
VideoGIE. 2022 May 14;7(9):340-343. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Evaluation of Antireflux Mucosectomy for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Medium-Term Results of a Pilot Study.重度胃食管反流病抗反流黏膜切除术的评估:一项初步研究的中期结果
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 21;2022:1606944. doi: 10.1155/2022/1606944. eCollection 2022.
6
Long-term efficacy of antireflux mucosectomy in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管反流病的长期疗效。
Dig Endosc. 2024 Mar;36(3):305-313. doi: 10.1111/den.14617. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy for proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease: First Indian study (with video).质子泵抑制剂依赖型胃食管反流病抗反流黏膜切除术的可行性及结果:印度的首项研究(附视频)
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):745-752. doi: 10.1111/den.13606. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) as a new treatment for gastroesophageal reflux refractory to proton pump inhibitors: a pilot study.抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMA)作为质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流的一种新治疗方法:一项试点研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Feb;8(2):E133-E138. doi: 10.1055/a-1031-9436. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
Antireflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy and the mechanism of action.抗反流黏膜切除术治疗胃食管反流病:疗效及作用机制
Endoscopy. 2024 Dec;56(12):897-905. doi: 10.1055/a-2333-5232. Epub 2024 May 27.
10
Pilot study of an endoluminal-suturing device as a treatment for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.腔内缝合装置治疗胃食管反流病患者的初步研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):E1092-E1098. doi: 10.1055/a-2185-5947. eCollection 2023 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Severe adverse effect of antireflux band mucosectomy.抗反流带黏膜切除术的严重不良反应
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E642-E643. doi: 10.1055/a-2615-6258. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
A comparative analysis of ARMS (anti-reflux mucosectomy) and TIF (transoral incisionless fundoplication) in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)与经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的对比分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 22;87(6):3596-3609. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003311. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
A pilot study on anti-reflux mucoplasty with valve as novel endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Anti-reflux mucosectomy with band ligation in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜切除术联合套扎术治疗难治性胃食管反流病
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):E215-E216. doi: 10.1055/a-0875-3479. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
A prospective multicenter study using a new multiband mucosectomy device for endoscopic resection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.前瞻性多中心研究,使用新型多频黏膜切除术装置行 Barrett 食管早期肿瘤的内镜下切除。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):647-654. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
3
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.
一项关于以瓣膜进行抗反流黏膜成形术作为胃食管反流病新型内镜治疗方法的初步研究。
DEN Open. 2025 May 4;6(1):e70131. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70131. eCollection 2026 Apr.
4
Endoscopic mucosal resection - transoral outlet reduction: treatment of excessively wide gastro-jejunal anastomosis.内镜黏膜切除术 - 经口缩小术:治疗过宽的胃空肠吻合术。
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E369. doi: 10.1055/a-2587-8447. Epub 2025 May 6.
5
Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)治疗难治性胃食管反流病。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 18;29(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01789-5.
6
Pilot study on anti-reflux mucoplasty: Advancing endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜成形术的初步研究:推进内镜下胃食管反流病抗反流治疗
Dig Endosc. 2024 Jun;36(6):690-698. doi: 10.1111/den.14711. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
7
New Perspectives in Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病内镜治疗的新视角
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;13(12):2057. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122057.
8
Study on the Effect of Different Endoscopic Auxiliary Treatment of Gastric Mucosal Microtumor.不同内镜辅助治疗胃黏膜微小肿瘤的效果研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Oct 11;2022:2557952. doi: 10.1155/2022/2557952. eCollection 2022.
9
Positive and negative impact of anti-reflux mucosal intervention on gastroesophageal reflux disease.抗反流黏膜干预对胃食管反流病的正负影响
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1060-1069. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09605-z. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
Clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy . Stretta radiofrequency in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.内镜下抗反流黏膜切除术(Stretta射频消融术)治疗胃食管反流病的临床疗效:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jun;10(12):660. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2071.
现代 GERD 诊断:里昂共识。
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351-1362. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
4
Endoscopic anti-reflux devices (with videos).内镜抗反流装置(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):931-948. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的管理。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(2):302-318. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
6
SAGES endoluminal treatments for GERD.SAGES针对胃食管反流病的腔内治疗
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3783-3790. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5639-1. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group.门诊反流监测在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用:波尔图共识更新及国际共识专家组建议。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Oct;29(10):1-15. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13067. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Epidemiology and natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病的流行病学及自然史
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2017 Sep;63(3):175-183. doi: 10.23736/S1121-421X.17.02383-2. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Trial: Efficacy of Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Double-Dose Rabeprazole on Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Related Symptoms and Quality of Life.一项多中心、随机、开放标签试验:每日一次与每日两次双倍剂量雷贝拉唑治疗难治性胃食管反流病相关症状及生活质量的疗效对比
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2016 Nov 25;79:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2016.11.002. eCollection 2016.
10
Association Between Response to Acid-Suppression Therapy and Efficacy of Antireflux Surgery in Patients With Extraesophageal Reflux.抑酸治疗反应与抗反流手术治疗食管外反流疗效的关系。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;15(5):675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Nov 10.