Institute for Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):186-196. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.186.
Oral oncolytic therapies have improved survival in hematologic cancers, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and multiple myeloma (MM), which are now being managed like chronic conditions. However, compared with other cancers, there is a lack of studies assessing adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients with these cancers.
To assess factors associated with adherence to oral oncolytic therapies, health care utilization, and costs in patients with CLL/SLL or MM.
A retrospective database study was conducted using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplement databases. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with and prescribed an oral oncolytic for CLL/SLL (ibrutinib or idelalisib) or MM (thalidomide, lenalidomide, or pomalidomide) between 2013 and 2016 and with continuous eligibility 6 months before and 12 months after oral oncolytic initiation were identified. Adherence to oral oncolytics was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) metric. Multiple linear regression and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify adherence predictors. Count models assessed the relationship between adherence and resource utilization, and generalized linear models assessed the relationship between adherence and health care costs.
A total of 701 and 2,385 patients were identified with CLL/SLL or MM, respectively. Mean PDC (SD) for CLL/SLL and MM patients was 75.3 (22.5) and 57.6 (26.5), respectively. For CLL/SLL patients, those aged ≥ 65 years (beta [B] = -4.00) had lower medication use. Among MM patients, multiple predictors of higher medication use emerged: aged ≥ 65 years (B = 3.44), higher than average outpatient resource utilization (B = 3.53), insurance plan other than preferred provider organization (PPO; B = -2.58), previous cancer therapy (B = -2.81), higher number of concurrent unique therapeutic classes (B = -0.35), and higher comorbidity burden (B = -2.55). Patients with CLL/SLL and enrolled in plans other than a PPO were more likely to be adherent (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.01-1.98), whereas patients who were aged ≥ 65 years, were residents of the southern United States, and had visited the emergency department in the baseline period were less likely to be adherent. For MM patients, those aged ≥ 65 years (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.38-2.04) and with higher than average outpatient services utilization (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.01-1.52) were more likely to be adherent, whereas those enrolled in plans other than a PPO, previously treated with cancer therapy, and with higher comorbidity burden were less likely to be adherent. In both cohorts, adherent patients had significantly lower odds of health care utilization and incurred lower medical costs, but higher prescription costs, following oncolytic initiation; however, total costs were not significantly lower in those adherent.
Factors were identified that influenced adherence at the patient, treatment, and health system levels. These factors can be used to identify patients requiring interventions for improving medication-taking behavior and associated health care burden.
This study received no outside funding. Dashputre was recently employed by Novartis; K. Gatwood has received speaker fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and J. Gatwood has received research funding from Merck & Co. and GlaxoSmithKline, unrelated to this study..
口服肿瘤疗法提高了血液系统癌症(如慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤[CLL/SLL]和多发性骨髓瘤[MM])患者的生存率,这些癌症现在被视为慢性病进行管理。然而,与其他癌症相比,在这些癌症患者中,评估其用药依从性、医疗保健资源利用和成本的研究相对较少。
评估与 CLL/SLL 或 MM 患者口服肿瘤疗法的依从性、医疗保健利用和成本相关的因素。
利用 IBM MarketScan 商业索赔和 Medicare 补充数据库进行了一项回顾性数据库研究。纳入 2013 年至 2016 年期间诊断为 CLL/SLL(伊布替尼或idelalisib)或 MM(沙利度胺、来那度胺或泊马度胺)并开具口服肿瘤药物处方的成年人(年龄≥18 岁),且在口服肿瘤药物起始前 6 个月和起始后 12 个月持续有资格享受保险。使用比例天数覆盖(PDC)指标衡量口服肿瘤药物的依从性。采用多元线性回归和多变量逻辑回归确定依从性预测因素。计数模型评估了依从性与资源利用之间的关系,广义线性模型评估了依从性与医疗保健成本之间的关系。
共纳入 701 例 CLL/SLL 患者和 2385 例 MM 患者。CLL/SLL 和 MM 患者的平均 PDC(标准差)分别为 75.3(22.5)和 57.6(26.5)。对于 CLL/SLL 患者,年龄≥65 岁(β[B]=-4.00)者的药物使用率较低。在 MM 患者中,出现了多个与更高药物使用率相关的预测因素:年龄≥65 岁(B=3.44)、高于平均门诊资源利用率(B=3.53)、非首选提供者组织(PPO)保险计划(B=-2.58)、既往癌症治疗(B=-2.81)、同时使用的独特治疗药物类别数量较高(B=-0.35)和合并症负担较高(B=-2.55)。与 PPO 计划相比,使用其他计划的 CLL/SLL 患者更有可能保持依从性(OR=1.41,95%CI=1.01-1.98),而年龄≥65 岁、居住在美国南部地区且在基线期就诊于急诊的患者更不可能保持依从性。对于 MM 患者,年龄≥65 岁(OR=1.68,95%CI=1.38-2.04)和高于平均门诊服务利用率(OR=1.24,95%CI=1.01-1.52)的患者更有可能保持依从性,而那些参加 PPO 以外计划、既往接受癌症治疗和合并症负担较高的患者更不可能保持依从性。在两个队列中,依从性患者在开始使用肿瘤药物后,医疗保健利用和医疗成本的可能性显著降低,但处方成本更高,但总费用在依从性患者中并没有显著降低。
确定了影响患者、治疗和医疗保健系统层面依从性的因素。这些因素可用于识别需要干预措施以改善药物治疗行为和相关医疗保健负担的患者。
这项研究没有接受外部资金。Dashputre 最近受雇于诺华公司;K. Gatwood 曾从 Jazz 制药公司获得演讲费;J. Gatwood 曾从默克公司和葛兰素史克公司获得与这项研究无关的研究资金。