Suppr超能文献

慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤患者中肿瘤溶解综合征的临床和经济负担:一项美国真实世界回顾性研究

Clinical and economic burden of tumor lysis syndrome among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: A real-world US retrospective study.

作者信息

Rogers Kerry A, Lu Xiaoxiao, Emond Bruno, Côté-Sergent Aurélie, Kinkead Frédéric, Lafeuille Marie-Hélène, Lefebvre Patrick, Huang Qing

机构信息

Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):1033-1045. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22075. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

Abstract

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a potentially fatal complication of antineoplastic treatments for hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients developing TLS require intensive care, adding to the overall clinical and economic burden of CLL/SLL. To analyze TLS-associated health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with CLL/SLL treated with regimens associated with a high TLS risk (per treatment guidelines), ie, anti-CD20-based chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), lenalidomide, obinutuzumab, or venetoclax. Adult patients with CLL/SLL in the MarketScan Databases (January 1, 2006, to April 30, 2020) initiated on CIT, lenalidomide, obinutuzumab, or venetoclax (index date) on or after January 1, 2007, were included in the analysis. Treatment-emergent TLS was defined as TLS occurring in the first 90 days of active treatment. The post-index period was divided into 30-day intervals until the end of the index regimen; intervals pre-TLS were non-TLS intervals and those starting from the TLS event were TLS intervals. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) HCRU and costs were compared between TLS and non-TLS intervals using generalized linear models adjusted for baseline and time-varying confounders. The proportion of patients in the TLS cohort (patients with treatment-emergent TLS) and non-TLS cohort (patients with no treatment-emergent TLS) who switched treatment within 90 days post-index was compared using Kaplan-Meier rates with logrank values. Among 6,343 patients with CLL/SLL, 71 (1.1%) developed treatment-emergent TLS (venetoclax: 11.5%; other regimens: 0.8%) after a mean (median) of 12.7 (7.0) days following treatment initiation (mean [median] duration of index regimen: 16.0 [10.0] months); 12 (0.2%) developed clinical TLS (venetoclax: 3.1%; other regimens: 0.1%). TLS was associated with 1.7 times more inpatient admissions ( < 0.001), 2 times more days of inpatient stay ( = 0.012), 22% fewer days of antineoplastic drug administration ( = 0.020), and $3,062 PPPM higher health care costs ( = 0.016), which were mainly driven by $1,688 PPPM higher inpatient costs ( = 0.044). Higher costs were observed among both patients who initiated venetoclax (TLS: $24,170; non-TLS: $20,091) and those who initiated other regimens (TLS: $8,746; non-TLS: $6,915). More patients in the TLS vs non-TLS cohort switched treatment in the first 90 days of treatment (12.6% vs 5.1%, = 0.006). TLS was associated with a substantial cost burden (driven by inpatient costs) and higher rate of treatment switching (vs non-TLS cohort) in patients with CLL/SLL treated with CIT, obinutuzumab, lenalidomide, or venetoclax. The risk of treatment-emergent TLS and associated incremental HCRU and costs, as well as the potential impact on quality of life, should be weighed when evaluating the risk-benefit of therapies in CLL/SLL management. Dr Rogers has received research funding from Genentech, AbbVie, Novartis, and Janssen (not for the present study); consulting fees from Acerta Pharma, AstraZeneca, Innate Pharma, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, and AbbVie; and travel funding from AstraZeneca. Mr Emond, Mr Kinkead, Ms Lafeuille, and Mr Lefebvre are employees of Analysis Group, Inc., which has provided paid consulting services to Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Drs Lu and Huang are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. Ms Côté-Sergent was an employee of Analysis Group, Inc., at the time the study was conducted. This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. The sponsor was involved in the study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; manuscript writing; and the decision to publish the article.

摘要

肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)是血液系统恶性肿瘤(包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SLL))抗肿瘤治疗中一种潜在的致命并发症。发生TLS的患者需要重症监护,这增加了CLL/SLL的总体临床和经济负担。为了分析接受高TLS风险治疗方案(根据治疗指南)(即基于抗CD20的化学免疫疗法(CIT)、来那度胺、奥妥珠单抗或维奈克拉)治疗的CLL/SLL患者中与TLS相关的医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本。纳入市场扫描数据库(2006年1月1日至2020年4月30日)中于2007年1月1日或之后开始接受CIT、来那度胺、奥妥珠单抗或维奈克拉治疗(索引日期)的成年CLL/SLL患者进行分析。治疗出现的TLS定义为在积极治疗的前90天内发生的TLS。索引期后分为30天间隔,直至索引治疗方案结束;TLS发生前的间隔为非TLS间隔,从TLS事件开始的间隔为TLS间隔。使用针对基线和随时间变化的混杂因素进行调整的广义线性模型,比较TLS和非TLS间隔期间每位患者每月(PPPM)的HCRU和成本。使用带有对数秩值的Kaplan-Meier率比较TLS队列(出现治疗相关TLS的患者)和非TLS队列(未出现治疗相关TLS的患者)中在索引后90天内更换治疗的患者比例。在6343例CLL/SLL患者中,71例(1.1%)在开始治疗后平均(中位数)12.7(7.0)天出现治疗相关TLS(维奈克拉:11.5%;其他方案:0.8%)(索引治疗方案的平均[中位数]持续时间:16.0[10.0]个月);12例(0.2%)出现临床TLS(维奈克拉:3.1%;其他方案:0.1%)。TLS与住院次数增加1.7倍(P<0.001)、住院天数增加2倍(P = 0.012)、抗肿瘤药物给药天数减少22%(P = 0.020)以及PPPM医疗保健成本增加3062美元(P = 0.016)相关,这主要由PPPM住院成本增加1688美元驱动(P = 0.044)。开始使用维奈克拉的患者(TLS:24170美元;非TLS:20091美元)和开始使用其他方案的患者(TLS:8746美元;非TLS:6915美元)中均观察到更高的成本。与非TLS队列相比,TLS队列中有更多患者在治疗的前90天内更换治疗(12.6%对5.1%,P = 0.006)。在接受CIT、奥妥珠单抗、来那度胺或维奈克拉治疗的CLL/SLL患者中,TLS与巨大的成本负担(由住院成本驱动)和更高的治疗更换率(与非TLS队列相比)相关。在评估CLL/SLL管理中治疗的风险效益时,应权衡治疗相关TLS的风险以及相关的增量HCRU和成本,以及对生活质量的潜在影响。罗杰斯博士已从基因泰克、艾伯维、诺华和杨森公司获得研究资金(并非用于本研究);从阿塞特拉制药、阿斯利康、英诺特制药、 Pharmacyclics、基因泰克和艾伯维获得咨询费;并从阿斯利康获得差旅资金。埃蒙德先生、金基德先生、拉费尤尔女士和勒费布尔先生是分析集团公司的员工,该公司已为杨森科学事务有限责任公司提供付费咨询服务。卢博士和黄博士是杨森科学事务有限责任公司的员工,也是强生公司的股东。科泰 - 塞尔让女士在进行本研究时是分析集团公司的员工。本研究由杨森科学事务有限责任公司资助。资助者参与了研究设计;数据收集、分析和解释;手稿撰写;以及决定发表文章。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Current understanding of tumor lysis syndrome.肿瘤溶解综合征的当前认识。
Hematol Oncol. 2019 Dec;37(5):537-547. doi: 10.1002/hon.2668. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验