Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Zagajnikowa 9, 60-568 Poznań, Poland.
Poznan University of Physical Education, Królowej Jadwigi 27/39, 61-871 Poznań, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;17(3):849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030849.
This paper reports the results of an experiment that aimed to study transfer training in fencing. Fencers from the experimental group underwent six-week transfer training while those from the control group underwent regular fencing training. The fencers' performance was analyzed thrice: before the experimental training (pretest), immediately after it (posttest), and four weeks after it (retention test). Using a device that simulates fencing moves and analyzes the accuracy of such performance, participants completed, with both hands, three tests related to straight thrust accuracy. While no differences in hand grip strength was observed between the two groups across the three tests, significant differences occurred in terms of their performance on the device. The groups did not differ in the pretests and the retention tests. However, the fencers from the experimental group generally performed better in postests than prestests. These results show that bilateral transfer can be effective in foil fencing training, although its positive effects are short-term. In order to be effective, transfer training should be used as a regular training tool.
本文报告了一项旨在研究击剑转移训练的实验结果。实验组的击剑运动员接受了为期六周的转移训练,而对照组的击剑运动员则接受了常规的击剑训练。对击剑运动员的表现进行了三次分析:实验训练前(前测)、训练后立即(后测)和训练后四周(保持测试)。参与者使用模拟击剑动作并分析此类动作准确性的设备,双手完成了三项与直刺准确性相关的测试。虽然在三次测试中,两组的手握力没有差异,但在设备的使用方面存在显著差异。两组在前测和保持测试中没有差异。然而,实验组的击剑运动员在后测中的表现通常优于前测。这些结果表明,双侧转移在花剑训练中是有效的,尽管其积极影响是短期的。为了有效,转移训练应该作为一种常规的训练工具。