• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神科预嘱促进对心理健康消费者的影响:赋权、治疗态度和同伴支持专家的作用。

Impact of psychiatric advance directive facilitation on mental health consumers: empowerment, treatment attitudes and the role of peer support specialists.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Services Effectiveness Research Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Center for Excellence in Community Mental Health, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Ment Health. 2021 Oct;30(5):585-593. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1714008. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1080/09638237.2020.1714008
PMID:32013647
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A psychiatric advance directive (PAD) is designed to prevent involuntary mental health interventions by enabling people with serious mental illnesses to plan ahead for their own treatment during a future incapacitating crisis. This study implemented PAD facilitation in assertive community treatment (ACT) teams.

AIMS

We examined ACT clients' attitudes toward PAD facilitators, satisfaction with PAD facilitation, the short-term impact of PAD completion on subjective sense of empowerment and attitudes toward treatment, and whether the type of PAD facilitator made a difference.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to be offered PAD facilitation by a peer support specialist or non-peer ACT team clinician, and interviewed at baseline ( = 145) and post-facilitation 1-2-month follow-up ( = 116), to assess perceived consumer-directedness of PAD facilitation, empowerment and various treatment attitudes. Mean scores before and after the intervention were compared for PAD-completers, non-completers, and those who completed a PAD with a peer vs. non-peer. The effect of PAD completion was assessed using logistic and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of bias against peer-facilitators. There was a modest positive impact of PAD facilitation on treatment attitudes and empowerment.

CONCLUSIONS

PAD facilitation by peer support specialists and others working in community mental health settings supports recovery.

摘要

背景

精神科预先指示(PAD)旨在通过使患有严重精神疾病的人能够在未来的丧失能力危机中提前计划自己的治疗,从而防止非自愿的精神卫生干预。本研究在坚定的社区治疗(ACT)团队中实施了 PAD 促进措施。

目的

我们研究了 ACT 客户对 PAD 促进者的态度、对 PAD 促进的满意度、PAD 完成对主观赋权感和治疗态度的短期影响,以及 PAD 促进者的类型是否有影响。

方法

参与者被随机分配接受同伴支持专家或非同伴 ACT 团队临床医生提供的 PAD 促进,并在基线( = 145)和促进后 1-2 个月随访( = 116)进行访谈,以评估 PAD 促进的消费者导向感、赋权感和各种治疗态度。对 PAD 完成者、未完成者和与同伴或非同伴完成 PAD 的人进行干预前后的平均分数进行比较。使用逻辑回归和线性回归分析评估 PAD 完成的效果。

结果

没有证据表明对同伴促进者有偏见。PAD 促进对治疗态度和赋权感有适度的积极影响。

结论

同伴支持专家和其他在社区心理健康环境中工作的人提供 PAD 促进措施支持康复。

相似文献

1
Impact of psychiatric advance directive facilitation on mental health consumers: empowerment, treatment attitudes and the role of peer support specialists.精神科预嘱促进对心理健康消费者的影响:赋权、治疗态度和同伴支持专家的作用。
J Ment Health. 2021 Oct;30(5):585-593. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1714008. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Facilitation of Psychiatric Advance Directives by Peers and Clinicians on Assertive Community Treatment Teams.同伴和临床医生对积极社区治疗团队中精神科预先指示的促进作用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jul 1;68(7):717-723. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600423. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Appropriateness of psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer support specialists and clinicians on Assertive Community Treatment teams.由积极社区治疗团队中的同伴支持专家和临床医生协助制定的精神科预先指示的适宜性。
J Ment Health. 2022 Apr;31(2):239-245. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1952946. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
4
Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness.便利的精神科预先指示:一项针对严重精神疾病患者促进预先治疗规划干预措施的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1943-51. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1943.
5
Effect of Psychiatric Advance Directives Facilitated by Peer Workers on Compulsory Admission Among People With Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.同伴工作人员协助下的精神科预先指示对精神疾病患者强制入院的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 1;79(8):752-759. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1627.
6
Psychiatric advance directives in Switzerland: Knowledge and attitudes in patients compared to professionals and usage in clinical practice.瑞士的精神科预先指示:患者与专业人员的知识和态度比较,以及在临床实践中的使用情况。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jan-Feb;68:101514. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101514. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
A MAP to mental health: the process of creating a collaborative advance preferences instrument.心理健康指南:创建协作性预先偏好工具的过程
N Z Med J. 2018 Nov 30;131(1486):18-26.
8
Implementing recovery-oriented interventions with staff in a psychiatric hospital: A mixed-methods study.在精神病医院对工作人员实施以康复为导向的干预措施:一项混合方法研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):569-581. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12502. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Clinical decision making and views about psychiatric advance directives.临床决策与对精神科预先指示的看法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Mar;57(3):350-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.350.
10
Psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer workers among people with mental illness: economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial (DAiP study).同伴工作人员促进精神疾病患者的精神科预先指示:一项随机对照试验(DAiP 研究)的经济评估。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2023 Apr 25;32:e27. doi: 10.1017/S2045796023000197.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.将精神科预立医疗指示纳入患者可访问的电子健康记录:探索前景与局限
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e68549. doi: 10.2196/68549.
2
Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:对精神疾病患者结局证据的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70134. doi: 10.1111/hex.70134.
3
Effectiveness of Peer Support Programs for Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
同伴支持项目对严重精神疾病的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 11;12(12):1179. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121179.
4
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:当前证据及实施障碍的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14001. doi: 10.1111/hex.14001.
5
Community-based social interventions for people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of recent evidence.针对重度精神疾病患者的社区社会干预措施:近期证据的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):96-123. doi: 10.1002/wps.20940.
6
New Tools for Implementing Evidence-Based Care for Serious Mental Illness.实施严重精神疾病循证护理的新工具。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020 Oct;18(4):432-435. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200023. Epub 2020 Nov 5.