• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建术后翻修相关因素:登记数据的系统评价

Factors associated with revision following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of registry data.

作者信息

Rahardja Richard, Zhu Mark, Love Hamish, Clatworthy Mark G, Monk Andrew Paul, Young Simon W

机构信息

University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Knee. 2020 Mar;27(2):287-299. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2019.12.003
PMID:32014408
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To identify the patient and surgical factors associated with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction as reported by all national and community ACL registries.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Eligibility criteria included English studies published by national or community ACL registries reporting on primary ACL reconstruction and risk factors associated with revision ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies from the Swedish, Norwegian, Danish and Kaiser Permanente registries were included for review. Fourteen studies from all four registries reported younger age as a risk factor for revision ACL reconstruction. In addition, the Swedish registry reported concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, undergoing earlier surgery, lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), smaller graft diameter and an anteromedial portal drilling technique as risk factors for revision. The risk factors reported by the Norwegian registry included lower body mass index (BMI), lower KOOS, hamstring tendon grafts and suspensory fixation. The Danish registry reported hamstring tendon grafts, anteromedial portal drilling and suspensory fixation as risk factors. The Kaiser Permanente registry reported male sex, lower BMI, ethnicity, hamstring tendon grafts, allografts, smaller graft diameter and an anteromedial portal technique as risk factors for revision.

CONCLUSION

Multiple patient and surgical factors were associated with increased risk of revision ACL reconstruction in registries. Younger age and the use of hamstring tendon grafts were consistently reported as risk factors for failure.

摘要

背景

确定所有国家和社区前交叉韧带(ACL)登记处报告的与翻修ACL重建相关的患者和手术因素。

方法

对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统评价。纳入标准包括国家或社区ACL登记处发表的英文研究,报告初次ACL重建以及与翻修ACL重建相关的危险因素。

结果

纳入了来自瑞典、挪威、丹麦和凯撒医疗集团登记处的33项研究进行综述。所有四个登记处的14项研究报告称年龄较小是翻修ACL重建的危险因素。此外,瑞典登记处报告合并内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤、手术较早、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)较低、移植物直径较小以及采用前内侧入路钻孔技术是翻修的危险因素。挪威登记处报告的危险因素包括较低的体重指数(BMI)、较低的KOOS、腘绳肌腱移植物和悬吊固定。丹麦登记处报告腘绳肌腱移植物、前内侧入路钻孔和悬吊固定是危险因素。凯撒医疗集团登记处报告男性、较低的BMI、种族、腘绳肌腱移植物、同种异体移植物、较小的移植物直径和前内侧入路技术是翻修的危险因素。

结论

登记处中多种患者和手术因素与翻修ACL重建风险增加相关。年龄较小和使用腘绳肌腱移植物一直被报告为失败的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with revision following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of registry data.前交叉韧带重建术后翻修相关因素:登记数据的系统评价
Knee. 2020 Mar;27(2):287-299. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers.双束前交叉韧带重建技术并未降低翻修风险:来自斯堪的纳维亚登记处的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2503-2512. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5409-3.
3
No difference in revision rates between anteromedial portal and transtibial drilling of the femoral graft tunnel in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: early results from the New Zealand ACL Registry.在初次前交叉韧带重建中,前内侧入路与胫骨隧道入路在股骨移植物隧道扩钻时的翻修率无差异:来自新西兰 ACL 注册研究的早期结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Nov;28(11):3631-3638. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05959-w. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Increased risk of ACL revision with non-surgical treatment of a concomitant medial collateral ligament injury: a study on 19,457 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.非手术治疗合并内侧副韧带损伤与 ACL 翻修风险增加:来自瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处的 19457 例患者研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Aug;27(8):2450-2459. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5237-3. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Suspensory Versus Interference Tibial Fixation of Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry.前交叉韧带重建中腘绳肌腱自体移植物的悬吊与干扰胫骨固定:新西兰 ACL 注册中心的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(4):904-911. doi: 10.1177/03635465211070291. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.用于前交叉韧带重建的腘绳肌自体移植与髌腱自体移植:移植物失败率有差异吗?对47613例患者的荟萃分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.
7
The Influence of Graft Fixation Methods on Revision Rates After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.初次前交叉韧带重建后,移植物固定方式对翻修率的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):524-530. doi: 10.1177/0363546517748924. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
Graft Choice for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Concomitant Non-surgically Treated Medial Collateral Ligament Injury Does Not Influence the Risk of Revision.前交叉韧带重建伴非手术治疗内侧副韧带损伤时移植物的选择并不影响翻修风险。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
9
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to single-bundle reconstruction in terms of revision frequency: a study of 22,460 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.双束前交叉韧带重建在翻修频率方面优于单束重建:来自瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处的 22460 例患者研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3884-3891. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4387-4. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
10
Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.移植物直径作为翻修前交叉韧带重建以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)与欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)值的预测指标:一项基于瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处2240例患者的队列研究
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2092-2097. doi: 10.1177/0363546517704177. Epub 2017 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Rectus Femoris or Hamstring Tendon Shows Comparable Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Retrospective Cohort Study.使用股直肌或腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建翻修术在短期随访中显示出相似的患者报告结局指标:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 17;14(10):3512. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103512.
2
Ipsilateral Autologous Peroneus Longus and Bone Patellar Tendon Graft for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Leads to Similar Functional Outcome.同侧自体腓骨长肌和髌腱移植用于前交叉韧带重建翻修术的功能结局相似。
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Apr;15(4):221-228. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i04.5506.
3
Treatment Decision-Making for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture From the Perspective of Physical Therapists in Australia: A Mixed Methods Study.
从澳大利亚物理治疗师角度看前交叉韧带断裂的治疗决策:一项混合方法研究
Phys Ther. 2025 May 3;105(5). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf030.
4
Integrating Modern Technologies into Traditional Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Engineering.将现代技术融入传统前交叉韧带组织工程
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;12(1):39. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010039.
5
Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends.前交叉韧带重建中的移植物选择:当前趋势的全面综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 20;60(12):2090. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122090.
6
Age under 20 years, pre-operative participation in pivoting sports, and steep posterior tibial slope of more than 12° are risk factors for graft failure after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.20岁以下的年龄、术前参与旋转运动以及胫骨后倾坡度超过12°是双束前交叉韧带重建术后移植物失败的危险因素。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Dec 3;11(4):e70102. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70102. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using the Superficial Layer Quadriceps Tendon Graft: Surgical Technique Description.使用股四头肌肌腱浅层移植物联合重建前交叉韧带和前外侧韧带:手术技术描述
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 May 30;13(10):103067. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103067. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Rate and Timing of Revision and Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Relative to Index Surgery.翻修及对侧前交叉韧带重建相对于初次手术的发生率及时间安排。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 4;12(10):23259671241274671. doi: 10.1177/23259671241274671. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
ACL reconstruction demonstrates better stability compared to ACL repair for patients with Schenck III and IV knee dislocations.前交叉韧带重建术在 Schenck III 型和 IV 型膝关节脱位患者中比前交叉韧带修复术具有更好的稳定性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4325-4331. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05532-x. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
10
Registry-based cohort study comparing percentages of patients reaching PASS for knee function outcomes after revision ACLR compared to primary ACLR.基于注册的队列研究比较了膝关节前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后达到 PASS 膝关节功能结果的患者比例与初次 ACLR 相比。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):e081688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081688.