• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青霉素过敏与开放式腹壁疝修补术后结局的关系。

The association of penicillin allergy with outcomes after open ventral hernia repair.

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4148-4156. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07183-1. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-07183-1
PMID:32016513
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 11% of patients report a penicillin allergy (PA), with 1-2% demonstrating a true IgE mediated allergy upon testing. PA patients often receive non-beta-lactam antibiotic surgical prophylaxis (non-BLP). This study evaluates the relationship of PA to outcomes after open ventral hernia repair (OVHR).

METHODS

A prospective institutional database was queried for patients undergoing OVHR. Demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes were evaluated by the reported PA and the administration of beta-lactam prophylaxis (BLP).

RESULTS

Allergy histories were reviewed in 1178 patients. PA was reported in 21.6% of patients, with 55.5% reporting rash or hives, 15.0% airway compromise or anaphylaxis, and 29.5% no specific reaction. BLP was administered to 76.3% of patients, including 22.1% of PA patients and 89.9% of patients without PA. PA patients were more often female (64.6% PA patients vs. 56% non-PA, p = 0.01), with higher rates of chronic steroids, MRSA, anxiety, asthma, COPD, chronic pain, and sleep apnea (p < 0.03 all values). PA patients had higher rates of contaminated cases, including mesh infection and fistula. Of the 683 clean cases, 82.1% received BLP. Of the 117 clean contaminated cases (CDC wound class 2), 82.9% received BLP, which was associated with reduced long-term readmission for hernia complications (21.5 vs. 55%, p = 0.002, OR 0.27, CI 0.09-0.83). In the 120 CDC wound class 3 and 4 patients, 65.8% received BLP. In multivariate analysis, BLP was associated with lower rates of reoperation (OR 0.31, CI 0.12-0.76) and recurrence (OR 0.32, CI 0.11-0.86). BLP was given to 22.1% of the PA patients with no adverse reactions noted.

CONCLUSION

PA patients had more comorbidities and complex ventral hernias. When controlling for contamination and MRSA history, BLP is associated with improved outcomes particularly in contaminated cases. PA may be a risk factor for patient complexity, and further studies are warranted to determine if allergy testing can be warranted in known or anticipated contaminated cases.

摘要

背景

多达 11%的患者报告有青霉素过敏(PA),其中 1-2%在检测时表现出真正的 IgE 介导的过敏。PA 患者经常接受非β-内酰胺抗生素手术预防(非 BLP)。本研究评估了 PA 与开放式腹疝修复(OVHR)后结局的关系。

方法

前瞻性机构数据库中检索了接受 OVHR 的患者。通过报告的 PA 和β-内酰胺预防(BLP)的管理,评估了人口统计学、手术特征和结局。

结果

对 1178 例患者的过敏史进行了回顾。21.6%的患者报告有 PA,其中 55.5%报告有皮疹或荨麻疹,15.0%有气道阻塞或过敏反应,29.5%无特定反应。76.3%的患者接受了 BLP,包括 22.1%的 PA 患者和 89.9%的无 PA 患者。PA 患者更常见于女性(64.6%的 PA 患者 vs. 56%的非 PA 患者,p=0.01),并且更常患有慢性类固醇、MRSA、焦虑、哮喘、COPD、慢性疼痛和睡眠呼吸暂停(所有值均<0.03)。PA 患者有更高的污染病例发生率,包括网片感染和瘘管。在 683 例清洁病例中,82.1%接受了 BLP。在 117 例清洁污染病例(CDC 伤口分类 2)中,82.9%接受了 BLP,这与疝并发症的长期再入院率降低有关(21.5% vs. 55%,p=0.002,OR 0.27,CI 0.09-0.83)。在 120 例 CDC 伤口分类 3 和 4 患者中,65.8%接受了 BLP。在多变量分析中,BLP 与较低的再手术率(OR 0.31,CI 0.12-0.76)和复发率(OR 0.32,CI 0.11-0.86)相关。在没有不良反应的情况下,BLP 被给予 22.1%的 PA 患者。

结论

PA 患者有更多的合并症和复杂的腹疝。在控制污染和 MRSA 病史的情况下,BLP 与改善结局相关,尤其是在污染病例中。PA 可能是患者复杂性的一个危险因素,有必要进一步研究确定在已知或预期污染病例中是否需要进行过敏测试。

相似文献

1
The association of penicillin allergy with outcomes after open ventral hernia repair.青霉素过敏与开放式腹壁疝修补术后结局的关系。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4148-4156. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07183-1. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Early Wound Morbidity after Open Ventral Hernia Repair with Biosynthetic or Polypropylene Mesh.使用生物合成或聚丙烯补片进行开放性腹疝修补术后的早期伤口并发症
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Oct;225(4):472-480e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.1067. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
3
The effect of component separation technique on quality of life (QOL) and surgical outcomes in complex open ventral hernia repair (OVHR).组件分离技术对复杂开放性腹疝修补术(OVHR)患者生活质量(QOL)和手术结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3539-3546. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5382-z. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
4
Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗原发性腹外疝的结果比较。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Nov;148(11):1043-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3587.
5
Outcomes specific to patient sex after open ventral hernia repair.开放型腹侧疝修补术后患者特定结局。
Surgery. 2020 Mar;167(3):614-619. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
6
Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.猪脱细胞真皮基质与合成补片及缝线用于复杂开放性腹疝修补术的疗效比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;15(5):506-12. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.090. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
7
Mesh fistula after ventral hernia repair: What is the optimal management?腹外疝修补术后的网孔瘘:最佳处理方法是什么?
Surgery. 2020 Mar;167(3):590-597. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
8
Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.生物补片用于清洁-污染和污染性腹疝修补术中腹壁重建的疗效分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000030.
9
Quality of life following component separation versus standard open ventral hernia repair for large hernias.大型疝采用成分分离术与标准开放性腹疝修补术后的生活质量
Surg Innov. 2014 Apr;21(2):147-54. doi: 10.1177/1553350613495113. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
10
Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in patients with chronic liver disease.慢性肝病患者腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5031-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
National expert consensus on the management of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients with a penicillin allergy label based on the Delphi method.基于德尔菲法的外科青霉素过敏患者抗生素预防管理的全国专家共识。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Mar 5;7(2):dlaf024. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf024. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
A rapid literature review of the impact of penicillin allergy on antibiotic resistance.青霉素过敏对抗生素耐药性影响的快速文献综述。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Jan 21;7(1):dlaf002. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf002. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Concurrent Panniculectomy With Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Propensity-scored Matched Study of Quality Improvement Outcomes.
同期行腹壁重建的腹壁整形术:一项关于质量改善结果的倾向评分匹配研究
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 24;12(12):e6381. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006381. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The impact of a closing protocol on wound morbidity in abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh.闭合方案对使用补片进行腹壁重建时伤口发病率的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1283-1289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11420-7. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
5
Diagnosis and Treatment of Perioperative Allergic Complications: A Practical Review.围手术期过敏并发症的诊断与治疗:实用综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 15;12(4):e5734. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005734. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Impact of penicillin allergy labels on surgical site infections in a large UK cohort of gastrointestinal surgery patients.青霉素过敏标签对英国一大群胃肠外科手术患者手术部位感染的影响。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Feb 16;6(1):dlae022. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae022. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Prevalence of reported penicillin allergy and associations with perioperative complications, length of stay, and cost in patients undergoing elective cancer surgery.择期癌症手术患者中报告的青霉素过敏患病率及其与围手术期并发症、住院时间和费用的关联。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 13;3(1):e234. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.501. eCollection 2023.
8
Building a Center for Abdominal Core Health: The Importance of a Holistic Multidisciplinary Approach.建立腹部核心健康中心:整体多学科方法的重要性。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Mar;26(3):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05241-5. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
Assessment of the Frequency of Dual Allergy to Penicillins and Cefazolin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估青霉素和头孢唑林双重过敏的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Apr 1;156(4):e210021. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0021. Epub 2021 Apr 14.