Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Intertek Testing Services Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518129, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 20;714:136856. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136856. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
Bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is an effective option for mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Nevertheless, there is barely serious debate about whether its implementation can possibly jeopardize the global water resources security. Here, we provided an assessment of biomass-based Substitute Natural Gas (BioSNG) production combined with CCS, a promising BECCS technology, in terms of global water resources security, with a focus on the growth of two typical second-generation bioenergy crops: switchgrass and miscanthus. A bottom-up analysis approach was applied in this paper to calculating water consumption for BECCS and estimating water quality deterioration caused by increasing fertilizer and pesticide application. The results indicated that water usage of BECCS was equal to adding 12.86%-16.64% (switchgrass) and 17.59%-26.06% (miscanthus) additional water stress on global available water resources at 2100. Additional N fertilizer application in 2100 would be equal to over 84%, 55% and 42% for both switchgrass and miscanthus under three CCS capture efficiency scenarios, respectively, comparing to such global scale in 2012. Additional phosphate fertilizer adding to global annual available water at 2100 were 0.004-0.008 mg L (switchgrass) and 0.003-0.006 mg L (miscanthus), respectively. The secondary environmental hazards, such as NO emission, would offset GHG emission mitigation by BECCS. Meanwhile, the enrichment and leaching of pesticide residues increased the risk of groundwater contamination. This study revealed water consumption and contamination issues caused by BECCS cannot be neglected. Thus, additional studies of accurate land-use models in global scale and advanced technology for biofuel extraction are needed in the future.
生物能源碳捕获与封存(BECCS)是减少温室气体(GHG)排放的有效选择。然而,几乎没有关于其实施是否可能危及全球水资源安全的严肃辩论。在这里,我们根据全球水资源安全评估了生物质基替代天然气(BioSNG)生产与碳捕获和封存(CCS)相结合的情况,这是一种很有前途的 BECCS 技术,重点关注两种典型的第二代生物能源作物:柳枝稷和芒草。本文采用自下而上的分析方法来计算 BECCS 的耗水量,并估计因增加化肥和农药施用而导致的水质恶化。结果表明,到 2100 年,BECCS 的用水量相当于全球可用水资源增加了 12.86%-16.64%(柳枝稷)和 17.59%-26.06%(芒草)的额外用水压力。在三种 CCS 捕获效率情景下,到 2100 年,与 2012 年全球规模相比,柳枝稷和芒草的氮肥施用量将分别增加 84%、55%和 42%。到 2100 年,全球每年可用水中添加的磷肥料将分别为 0.004-0.008mg/L(柳枝稷)和 0.003-0.006mg/L(芒草)。NO 排放等二次环境危害将抵消 BECCS 减少的温室气体排放。同时,农药残留的富集和淋溶增加了地下水污染的风险。本研究揭示了 BECCS 引起的耗水和污染问题不容忽视。因此,未来需要在全球范围内开展更精确的土地利用模型和生物燃料提取的先进技术的研究。