Beaglehole R, Dobson A, Hobbs M, Jackson R, Jamrozik K, Alexander H, Stewart A
Department of Community Health, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1988;728:53-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1988.tb05553.x.
Data from three MONICA centres in Auckland (New Zealand) and Newcastle and Perth (Australia) are used to explore some of the issues involved in comparing event rates and case fatality among MONICA centres. Auckland and Newcastle follow the "hot pursuit" method of identifying and interviewing patients while they are still in hospital. Perth follows the "cold pursuit" method, in which patients are identified by search of computerized hospital records after discharge and all data are abstracted retrospectively from case notes. Fatal cases are identified by the same method in the three centres. The distribution of events by MONICA diagnostic classification varied among centres, with Perth having the highest proportion of definite myocardial infarction events and the lowest proportion of possible myocardial infarction events. These differences appear to be due to the different methods of event ascertainment and data collection, and to variations in post mortem rates between centres. For comparisons among these three centres, the categories of non-fatal definite myocardial infarction and of all coronary heart disease deaths (that is those in the MONICA categories fatal definite myocardial infarction, fatal possible myocardial infarction, and fatal cases with insufficient data) appear to be the most useful.
来自新西兰奥克兰以及澳大利亚纽卡斯尔和珀斯的三个莫尼卡(MONICA)中心的数据,被用于探究莫尼卡中心之间在比较事件发生率和病死率时所涉及的一些问题。奥克兰和纽卡斯尔采用“紧追不放”的方法,即在患者仍住院时就对其进行识别和访谈。珀斯采用“事后追查”的方法,即出院后通过搜索计算机化的医院记录来识别患者,所有数据都从病历中进行回顾性提取。三个中心通过相同的方法识别死亡病例。按莫尼卡诊断分类的事件分布在各中心之间存在差异,珀斯确诊心肌梗死事件的比例最高,可能心肌梗死事件的比例最低。这些差异似乎是由于事件确定和数据收集方法不同,以及各中心尸检率的差异所致。对于这三个中心之间的比较,非致命性确诊心肌梗死类别以及所有冠心病死亡病例类别(即莫尼卡类别中的致命性确诊心肌梗死、致命性可能心肌梗死以及数据不足的致命病例)似乎最为有用。