Asnaashari Mohammad, Motamedi Salar, Asnaashari Negin, Azari-Marhabi Saranaz
Laser Application in Medical Science Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(Suppl 1):S13-S17. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.S3. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
Cross-contamination between dental office and prosthetic laboratories is of utmost importance. The dental prosthesis could harbor tones of microorganisms harmful to health staff. It has been estimated that more than 60% of the prostheses delivered to clinics from laboratories or vice versa are contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms. Several disinfection methods and chemicals have been proposed for sanitizing prostheses. Cold plasma, or nonthermal plasma, has been introduced as a new method in medical equipment disinfection. The current study aimed to compare the antimicrobial effect of cold plasma and the routinely used alcohol-based impression disinfectant ASEPTOPRINT® on disinfecting dentures. In this experimental study, 30 maxillary complete dentures were used as the microbial source. Dentures were randomly divided into 3 groups: (1) cold plasma treatment for 30 seconds, (2) cold plasma for 60 seconds, (3) ASEPTOPRINT® spray. Microbial culturing was taken before and after disinfection in each group on both Blood Agar plates and Soborou Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates. After 48 hours incubation at 37°C, the number of colonies was counted using a digital colony counter and differences between the groups were analyzed. A significant reduction in microbial colonies was observed after using all disinfection methods. ASEPTOPRINT® spray showed more antimicrobial effects comparing to cold plasma. The antimicrobial effect of ASEPTOPRINT® spray solution is more than cold plasma application on both microbial and fungal microorganisms. The time of plasma application was not accompanied by any significant differences in the results.
牙科诊所和义齿加工实验室之间的交叉污染至关重要。牙科修复体可能携带大量对医护人员健康有害的微生物。据估计,从实验室交付至诊所或反之的修复体中,超过60%被致病微生物污染。已经提出了几种消毒方法和化学药剂用于义齿消毒。冷等离子体,即非热等离子体,已作为一种医疗设备消毒的新方法被引入。本研究旨在比较冷等离子体和常规使用的酒精基印模消毒剂ASEPTOPRINT®对义齿消毒的抗菌效果。在这项实验研究中,30副上颌全口义齿被用作微生物来源。义齿被随机分为3组:(1)冷等离子体处理30秒,(2)冷等离子体处理60秒,(3)ASEPTOPRINT®喷雾。在每组消毒前后,分别在血琼脂平板和沙氏葡萄糖琼脂(SDA)平板上进行微生物培养。在37°C孵育48小时后,使用数字菌落计数器计数菌落数量,并分析组间差异。使用所有消毒方法后,微生物菌落均显著减少。与冷等离子体相比,ASEPTOPRINT®喷雾显示出更强的抗菌效果。ASEPTOPRINT®喷雾溶液对细菌和真菌微生物的抗菌效果均优于冷等离子体应用。等离子体应用时间在结果上未伴随任何显著差异。