Centre for Professional Work & Society, School of Business & Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):461-472. doi: 10.1111/hex.13023. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
Research into patient and public involvement (PPI) has not examined in detail patient and public involvement facilitators' (PPIFs) roles and activities. This study analysed PPIFs' roles using qualitative data gathered from three different UK health-care organizations.
Thematic analysis was used to examine cross-sectional data collected using a mixed-methods approach from three organizations: a mental health trust, a community health social enterprise and an acute hospital trust. The data set comprised of 27 interviews and 48 observations.
Patient and public involvement facilitators roles included the leadership and management of PPI interventions, developing health-care practices and influencing quality improvements (QI). They usually occupied middle-management grades but their PPIF role involved working in isolation or in small teams. They reported facilitating the development and maintenance of relationships between patients and the public, and health-care professionals and service managers. These roles sometimes required them to use conflict resolution skills and involved considerable emotional labour. Integrating information from PPI into service improvement processes was reported to be a challenge for these individuals.
Patient and public involvement facilitators capture and hold information that can be used in service improvement. However, they work with limited resources and support. Health-care organizations need to offer more practical support to PPIFs in their efforts to improve care quality, particularly by making their role integral to developing QI strategies.
针对患者和公众参与(PPI)的研究并未详细考察患者和公众参与促进者(PPIF)的角色和活动。本研究使用从三个不同的英国医疗保健组织收集的定性数据来分析 PPIF 的角色。
使用混合方法从三个组织(一个心理健康信托基金、一个社区健康社会企业和一个急性医院信托基金)中收集的横截面数据,采用主题分析进行检查。数据集包括 27 次访谈和 48 次观察。
患者和公众参与促进者的角色包括 PPI 干预措施的领导和管理、制定医疗保健实践以及影响质量改进(QI)。他们通常担任中层管理职位,但他们的 PPIF 角色涉及孤立或小团队工作。他们报告说促进了患者和公众与医疗保健专业人员和服务管理人员之间关系的发展和维护。这些角色有时需要他们运用冲突解决技能,并涉及相当大的情感劳动。将 PPI 信息整合到服务改进流程中被报告为这些人面临的挑战。
患者和公众参与促进者可以获取和掌握可用于服务改进的信息。然而,他们的工作资源和支持有限。医疗保健组织需要在他们努力提高护理质量方面为 PPIF 提供更多实际支持,特别是通过将他们的角色纳入 QI 战略的制定中。