Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
Universidad de Burgos.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2021 Mar;92(1):146-155. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2020.1719276. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
: A systematic review of the research conducted on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education in the last 5 years (2014-2019). : Seven databases were used to select those articles that included information on the implementation of Cooperative Learning in the different educational stages. After the exclusion criteria, 15 articles were fully assessed based on eight criteria: (1) year and author; (2) country; (3) number of participants, educational level, and duration of implementation; (4) type of research; (5) curricular content; (6) purpose of the research; (7) most relevant results; and (8) learning environment. : Results showed how research focused more on secondary education, mainly in short-term interventions. Most studies used qualitative and/or mixed methods, and dealt evenly with sports, motor skills, and physical abilities, leaving body expression underrepresented. Regarding the goals of the studies, social learning was the most frequently assessed, focusing on motivation, group climate, and teacher-student interaction. Criticisms regarding the shortness of the experiences and their fragmentation can still be considered valid. : This review can help researchers and practitioners conduct Cooperative Learning intervention programs in primary and secondary Physical Education. They must be rigorous when they claim that they implement this pedagogical model in schools.
对过去 5 年(2014-2019 年)中体育教育中的合作学习研究进行的系统回顾。
使用七个数据库来选择那些包含在不同教育阶段实施合作学习信息的文章。在排除标准之后,根据八项标准对 15 篇文章进行了全面评估:(1)年份和作者;(2)国家;(3)参与者人数、教育水平和实施持续时间;(4)研究类型;(5)课程内容;(6)研究目的;(7)最相关的结果;和(8)学习环境。结果表明,研究更多地集中在中等教育,主要是短期干预。大多数研究使用定性和/或混合方法,均衡地处理运动、运动技能和身体能力,身体表现的代表性不足。关于研究目标,社会学习是评估最多的,重点是动机、小组氛围和师生互动。关于经验的短暂性和分散性的批评仍然可以被认为是合理的。
本综述可以帮助研究人员和从业者在中小学体育教育中进行合作学习干预计划。他们在声称在学校实施这种教学模式时必须严谨。