CNRS UMR 8165, Laboratoire IMNC, Univ Paris-Sud, Univ Paris Diderot, 91405 Orsay, France.
ICPH Interactions Cellulaires et Physiopathologie Hépatique, UMR S 1174 INSERM, Univ Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0222371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222371. eCollection 2020.
The study of cell aggregation in vitro has a tremendous importance these days. In cancer biology, aggregates and spheroids serve as model systems and are considered as pseudo-tumors that are more realistic than 2D cell cultures. Recently, in the context of brain tumors (gliomas), we developed a new poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogel, with adhesive properties that can be controlled by the addition of poly(L-lysine) (PLL), and a stiffness close to the brain's. This substrate allows the motion of individual cells and the formation of cell aggregates (within one day), and we showed that on a non-adhesive substrate (PEG without PLL is inert for cells), the aggregates are bigger and less numerous than on an adhesive substrate (with PLL). In this article, we present new experimental results on the follow-up of the formation of aggregates on our hydrogels, from the early stages (individual cells) to the late stages (aggregate compaction), in order to compare, for two cell lines (F98 and U87), the aggregation process on the adhesive and non-adhesive substrates. We first show that a spaceless model of perikinetic aggregation can reproduce the experimental evolution of the number of aggregates, but not of the mean area of the aggregates. We thus develop a minimal off-lattice agent-based model, with a few simple rules reproducing the main processes that are at stack during aggregation. Our spatial model can reproduce very well the experimental temporal evolution of both the number of aggregates and their mean area, on adhesive and non-adhesive soft gels and for the two different cell lines. From the fit of the experimental data, we were able to infer the quantitative values of the speed of motion of each cell line, its rate of proliferation in aggregates and its ability to organize in 3D. We also found qualitative differences between the two cell lines regarding the ability of aggregates to compact. These parameters could be inferred for any cell line, and correlated with clinical properties such as aggressiveness and invasiveness.
目前,体外细胞聚集的研究具有重要意义。在癌症生物学中,聚集物和球体作为模型系统,被认为是比二维细胞培养更真实的类肿瘤。最近,在脑肿瘤(神经胶质瘤)的背景下,我们开发了一种新的聚乙二醇(PEG)基水凝胶,具有可通过添加聚-L-赖氨酸(PLL)控制的粘附特性,并且其硬度与大脑相近。该基底允许单个细胞的运动和细胞聚集的形成(在一天内),我们表明,在非粘附基底(无 PLL 的 PEG 对细胞无活性)上,聚集物比在粘附基底(有 PLL)上更大且数量更少。在本文中,我们展示了在我们的水凝胶上进行的聚集形成的后续实验结果,从早期(单个细胞)到晚期(聚集物压实),以便比较两种细胞系(F98 和 U87)在粘附和非粘附基底上的聚集过程。我们首先表明,无定形的亲代聚集模型可以复制聚集物数量的实验演化,但不能复制聚集物的平均面积。因此,我们开发了一个最小的无格基于代理的模型,其中包含一些简单的规则,可重现聚集过程中的主要过程。我们的空间模型可以很好地复制实验时间演化,包括粘附和非粘附软凝胶上的两种不同细胞系的聚集物数量和平均面积。通过拟合实验数据,我们能够推断出每个细胞系的运动速度、在聚集物中的增殖速度以及在 3D 中组织的能力的定量值。我们还发现两种细胞系在聚集物压实能力方面存在定性差异。这些参数可以被推断出来,并与侵略性和侵袭性等临床特性相关联。