• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理治疗师对外科门诊心理治疗中的协作和分级护理的看法——一项定性研究。

Psychotherapists' perspectives on collaboration and stepped care in outpatient psychotherapy-A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228748. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0228748
PMID:32023303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7002019/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stepped and collaborative care with outpatient psychotherapy as one treatment step is guideline-recommended for mental health care. To date, the experiences and evaluation of psychotherapists regarding collaboration and stepped care have been neglected. In order to improve collaborative mental health care, this qualitative study aimed at identifying psychotherapists' perspectives and needs within collaboration and stepped care.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 German outpatient psychotherapists were conducted and analyzed applying thematic analysis. The analysis was realized in a recursive process to first identify themes and then relate these themes back to the research questions with regard to collaboration and stepped care.

RESULTS

Collaboration mainly took place in small networks, with general practitioners and psychiatrists as the most important partners and psychotherapists wishing to intensify collaboration. Main barriers for collaboration were seen in deficient resources and remuneration and in a perceived lack of esteem by other medical specialties. Stepped care was appreciated for intensified collaboration and low-threshold access to care. Doubts were cast on its implementation within current health care conditions, worries concerned a primacy of economic principles instead of patient-orientation. Among further needs, psychotherapists demanded increased knowledge about psychotherapy, especially among general practitioners.

CONCLUSION

Psychotherapists expressed ambivalent attitudes towards stepped and collaborative care, substantially influenced by health care conditions and the perceived own standing among care providers. Psychotherapists' needs within stepped care comprise intensified collaboration, sufficient time, personal and financial resources for collaboration and opportunities for a constructive interprofessional dialogue.

摘要

目的

阶梯式和协作式护理,结合门诊心理治疗作为一个治疗步骤,是精神卫生保健的指南推荐。迄今为止,心理治疗师在协作和阶梯式护理方面的经验和评估一直被忽视。为了改善协作性的精神卫生保健,本定性研究旨在确定心理治疗师在协作和阶梯式护理方面的观点和需求。

方法

对 20 名德国门诊心理治疗师进行了半结构化的定性访谈,并应用主题分析进行了分析。分析是在一个递归过程中进行的,首先确定主题,然后将这些主题与关于协作和阶梯式护理的研究问题联系起来。

结果

协作主要发生在小网络中,全科医生和精神科医生是最重要的合作伙伴,心理治疗师希望加强协作。协作的主要障碍是资源和薪酬不足,以及其他医学专业对其缺乏尊重。阶梯式护理因其加强协作和低门槛获得护理而受到赞赏。对其在当前医疗保健条件下的实施存在疑虑,担忧是经济原则优先于以患者为中心的原则。进一步的需求包括,心理治疗师要求增加对心理治疗的了解,特别是在全科医生中。

结论

心理治疗师对阶梯式和协作式护理持矛盾态度,这主要受到医疗保健条件和治疗师在医疗服务提供者中的地位的影响。心理治疗师在阶梯式护理方面的需求包括加强协作、有足够的时间、合作的个人和财务资源以及进行建设性的跨专业对话的机会。

相似文献

1
Psychotherapists' perspectives on collaboration and stepped care in outpatient psychotherapy-A qualitative study.心理治疗师对外科门诊心理治疗中的协作和分级护理的看法——一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228748. eCollection 2020.
2
How do care providers evaluate collaboration? - qualitative process evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of collaborative and stepped care for patients with mental disorders.医护人员如何评估协作情况? - 一项针对精神障碍患者协作式和阶梯式护理的群组随机对照试验的定性过程评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 8;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03274-3.
3
["It's Left a Bitter Taste" Psychotherapists' Perspectives on the Abolition of the German Assessment Procedure for Outpatient Psychotherapy].["留下苦涩滋味":心理治疗师对德国门诊心理治疗评估程序废除的看法]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2023 Jan;73(1):16-24. doi: 10.1055/a-1850-1886. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
Positive mental health in psychotherapy: a qualitative study from psychotherapists' perspectives.心理治疗中的积极心理健康:心理治疗师视角的定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;10(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00816-6.
5
Evaluating the structural reform of outpatient psychotherapy in Germany (ES-RiP trial) - a qualitative study of provider perspectives.评估德国门诊心理治疗的结构改革(ES-RiP 试验)——提供者观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07220-7.
6
Othering refugees: Psychotherapists' attitudes toward patients with and without a refugee background.将难民他者化:心理治疗师对有难民背景和无难民背景患者的态度。
Psychother Res. 2023 Jun;33(5):654-668. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2150097. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
7
Psychotherapists' perspective on the treatment of patients with somatic symptom disorders.心理治疗师对躯体症状障碍患者治疗的看法。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Nov;138:110228. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110228. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
8
Barriers to use of interpreters in outpatient mental health care: Exploring the attitudes of psychotherapists.门诊心理健康护理中使用口译员的障碍:探索心理治疗师的态度。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;61(2):285-297. doi: 10.1177/13634615241227337. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
9
Psychotherapists' experiences providing at-home psychotherapy for home-living older adults with long-term care needs and depression.心理治疗师为有长期护理需求和抑郁症的居家老年人提供居家心理治疗的经历。
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Jul;70(4):403-414. doi: 10.1037/cou0000663. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
10
[How can the potential of internet- and mobile-based interventions be used in the treatment of depression? Findings from a qualitative survey among German psychotherapists].[如何将基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施的潜力用于抑郁症治疗?德国心理治疗师定性调查结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 May;186:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Working Together to Deliver Person-Centred Care Within the Stepped Care Model: An Australian Multidisciplinary Perspective.在阶梯式照护模式下共同努力提供以患者为中心的照护:澳大利亚多学科视角
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(4):e70111. doi: 10.1111/inm.70111.
2
Requirements for an electronic handover system for interprofessional collaboration between psychotherapists and occupational health professionals - a qualitative study.跨专业合作的电子交接系统需求:精神治疗师与职业健康专家的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):1087. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08381-9.
3
Assessing the Care Modality Preferences and Predictors for Digital Mental Health Treatment Seekers in a Technology-Enabled Stepped Care Delivery System: Cross-sectional Study.在技术支持的阶梯式护理服务系统中评估数字心理健康治疗寻求者的护理模式偏好及预测因素:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 15;5(9):e30162. doi: 10.2196/30162.
4
How do care providers evaluate collaboration? - qualitative process evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of collaborative and stepped care for patients with mental disorders.医护人员如何评估协作情况? - 一项针对精神障碍患者协作式和阶梯式护理的群组随机对照试验的定性过程评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 8;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03274-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care.COMET研究的研究方案:一项整群随机、前瞻性、平行组、优效性试验,旨在比较协作式逐步照护模式与初级保健中精神障碍患者常规治疗的有效性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e032408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408.
2
Mental health specialist video consultations for patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.基层医疗中为抑郁症或焦虑症患者提供心理健康专家视频咨询:一项随机对照可行性试验方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e030003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030003.
3
Acceptability of the Stepped Care Model of Depression Treatment in Primary Care Patients and Providers.初级保健患者和提供者对抑郁症治疗的阶梯式护理模式的接受度。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2019 Dec;26(4):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09599-2.
4
Management of comorbid mental and somatic disorders in stepped care approaches in primary care: a systematic review.初级保健中阶梯式照护模式下共病精神障碍和躯体疾病的管理:一项系统评价
Fam Pract. 2019 Jan 25;36(1):38-52. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy122.
5
Use of technology for care coordination initiatives for patients with mental health issues: a systematic literature review.用于精神健康问题患者护理协调计划的技术应用:一项系统文献综述
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Sep 13;14:2337-2349. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S172810. eCollection 2018.
6
The cost-utility of stepped-care algorithms according to depression guideline recommendations - Results of a state-transition model analysis.基于抑郁指南推荐的阶梯式护理算法的成本-效用 - 状态转移模型分析的结果。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.024. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
7
[Interface Problems Between Inpatient, GP and Outpatient Specialist Care: Viewpoint of General Practitioners in Dresden].[住院患者、全科医生与门诊专科护理之间的衔接问题:德累斯顿全科医生的观点]
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Oct;81(10):822-830. doi: 10.1055/a-0664-0470. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
Guideline-based stepped and collaborative care for patients with depression in a cluster-randomised trial.基于指南的阶梯式和协作式护理在一项集群随机试验中对抑郁症患者的效果。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):9389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27470-6.
9
Characteristics and Disparities among Primary Care Practices in the United States.美国初级保健实践的特征和差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):481-486. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4239-z. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
10
Effectiveness of a Stepped, Collaborative, and Coordinated Health Care Network for Somatoform Disorders (Sofu-Net): A Controlled Cluster Cohort Study.躯体形式障碍协作医疗网络(Sofu-Net)的有效性:一项对照性群组队列研究。
Psychosom Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;79(9):1016-1024. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000491.