Maier Lena, Engesser Deborah, Petermann-Meyer Andrea, Paul Rainer, Reuter Katrin, Singer Susanne
Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Johannes-Gutenberg Universität Mainz Institut für Medizinische Biometrie Epidemiologie und Informatik, Mainz, Germany.
Psychotherapie, Psychotherapeutische Praxis, Aachen, Germany.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2023 Jan;73(1):16-24. doi: 10.1055/a-1850-1886. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
In 2019, the abolition and replacement of the present German assessment procedure for outpatient psychotherapy was resolved and adopted into law. This study examined what psychotherapists think about the new plan.
We conducted semi-guided interviews with psychotherapists about their experience and opinion of the current psychotherapeutic care situation in Germany. Statements about the assessment procedure were evaluated using qualitative text analyses. We compared the psychotherapists' opinion on the assessment procedure with the psychotherapeutic approach as well as the age group.
Of 41 psychotherapists 27 reported their thoughts about the assessment procedure. The following themes could be drawn from their statements: Appreciation as well as criticism of quality control of the procedure, worries about a future loss of economic and treatment certainty, perception that the assessment procedure questions one's competence, disapproval of the low remuneration of the reports, the connection between individual attitudes towards the assessment report and conscientiousness in writing the reports, and the lack of transparency of the legislative initiative. Psychodynamic psychotherapists wanted to keep the assessment procedure slightly more often compared to behavioural psychotherapists; child and youth psychotherapists wanted to keep it more often than psychotherapists for adults.
Psychotherapists perceive the reform of the assessment procedure as a process with a substantial impact on their current clinical practice as well as their psychotherapeutical identity. To improve the quality and acceptance of the future quality assurance procedure, psychotherapists should be an active part of the development process.
2019年,德国现行的门诊心理治疗评估程序被废除并替换,相关内容已写入法律。本研究调查了心理治疗师对新计划的看法。
我们对心理治疗师进行了半结构化访谈,了解他们对德国当前心理治疗护理状况的经验和看法。使用定性文本分析对有关评估程序的陈述进行评估。我们将心理治疗师对评估程序的看法与心理治疗方法以及年龄组进行了比较。
41名心理治疗师中有27名报告了他们对评估程序的想法。从他们的陈述中可以得出以下主题:对该程序质量控制的赞赏与批评、对未来经济和治疗确定性丧失的担忧、认为评估程序质疑个人能力、不赞成报告报酬低、个人对评估报告的态度与撰写报告时的尽责程度之间的联系,以及立法倡议缺乏透明度。与行为心理治疗师相比,精神动力心理治疗师更倾向于保留评估程序;儿童和青少年心理治疗师比成人心理治疗师更倾向于保留该程序。
心理治疗师认为评估程序的改革是一个对他们当前临床实践以及心理治疗身份有重大影响的过程。为了提高未来质量保证程序的质量和可接受性,心理治疗师应该积极参与开发过程。