• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估日本非糖尿病受试者中,相对于血浆葡萄糖水平的瞬态葡萄糖监测的平均绝对相对差异的决定因素。

Assessment of factors that determine the mean absolute relative difference in flash glucose monitoring with reference to plasma glucose levels in Japanese subjects without diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.

出版信息

Endocr J. 2020 May 28;67(5):537-544. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0488. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0488
PMID:32023588
Abstract

The Abbott FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system (FGM) is a recently introduced, but widespread continuous glucose monitoring system. While its mean absolute relative difference (MARD) value indicating its accuracy is acceptable with reference to the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) levels, few reports have examined the MARD in sensor glucose values of FGM (FGM-SG) with reference to plasma glucose (PG) levels and the factors determining it. We performed oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) in 25 Japanese subjects without diabetes. Parkes error grid analyses showed that FGM-SG with either SMBG or PG levels as a reference met International Organization for Standardization criteria. The MARD in FGM-SG with reference to SMBG levels was 10.9 ± 4.1% during OGTTs. Surprisingly, the MARD in FGM-SG with reference to PG levels was 20.3 ± 10.3% during OGTTs, revealing a discrepancy in the accuracy of FGM-SG compared with that of PG levels; moreover, the MARD showed negative correlations with fasting blood sugar level, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index, and body mass index (BMI). Multiple regression analyses revealed that BMI contributed the most to the MARD when FGM-SG and PG level were compared, as lean individuals have a greater MARD regardless of glucose levels. Inaccurate FGM data could potentially increase the risk of inappropriate treatment; consideration of such factors is critical to ensure reliable FGM values.

摘要

雅培 FreeStyle Libre 瞬感血糖监测系统(FGM)是一种最近推出但广泛应用的连续血糖监测系统。虽然其平均绝对相对差异(MARD)值表明其与自我血糖监测(SMBG)水平的准确性是可以接受的,但很少有报告研究 FGM 传感器血糖值(FGM-SG)与血浆血糖(PG)水平以及决定其准确性的因素之间的 MARD。我们对 25 名无糖尿病的日本受试者进行了口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。Parkes 误差网格分析表明,无论以 SMBG 还是 PG 水平为参考,FGM-SG 均符合国际标准化组织标准。OGTT 期间,FGM-SG 与 SMBG 水平参考的 MARD 为 10.9 ± 4.1%。令人惊讶的是,OGTT 期间,FGM-SG 与 PG 水平参考的 MARD 为 20.3 ± 10.3%,这表明 FGM-SG 的准确性与 PG 水平存在差异;此外,MARD 与空腹血糖水平、稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数和体重指数(BMI)呈负相关。多元回归分析表明,当比较 FGM-SG 和 PG 水平时,BMI 对 MARD 的影响最大,因为无论血糖水平如何,瘦个体的 MARD 都更高。不准确的 FGM 数据可能会增加治疗不当的风险;考虑到这些因素对于确保可靠的 FGM 值至关重要。

相似文献

1
Assessment of factors that determine the mean absolute relative difference in flash glucose monitoring with reference to plasma glucose levels in Japanese subjects without diabetes.评估日本非糖尿病受试者中,相对于血浆葡萄糖水平的瞬态葡萄糖监测的平均绝对相对差异的决定因素。
Endocr J. 2020 May 28;67(5):537-544. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0488. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
Comparison of Interstitial Fluid Glucose Levels Obtained by Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Flash Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Hemodialysis.接受血液透析的 2 型糖尿病患者的连续血糖监测和瞬态血糖监测获得的间质液葡萄糖水平比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;14(6):1088-1094. doi: 10.1177/1932296819882690. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
3
Comparison of accuracy between flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis.比较 2 型糖尿病血液透析患者中瞬态血糖监测与连续血糖监测的准确性。
J Diabetes Complications. 2020 Nov;34(11):107680. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107680. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
4
Evaluation of the FreeStyle® Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.评价 FreeStyle® Libre 瞬感葡萄糖监测系统在 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年中的应用。
Horm Res Paediatr. 2018;89(3):189-199. doi: 10.1159/000487361. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
Careful readings for a flash glucose monitoring system in nondiabetic Japanese subjects: individual differences and discrepancy in glucose concentrarion after glucose loading [Rapid Communication].日本非糖尿病受试者中闪光葡萄糖监测系统的详细解读:葡萄糖负荷后血糖浓度的个体差异和差异[快速通讯]
Endocr J. 2017 Aug 30;64(8):827-832. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0193. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
6
Differences Between Flash Glucose Monitor and Fingerprick Measurements.血糖仪与指尖测量值的差异。
Biosensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 17;8(4):93. doi: 10.3390/bios8040093.
7
Accuracy of FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes who migrated from highlands to plains.2型糖尿病患者从高原地区迁移至平原地区后,FreeStyle Libre 瞬感葡萄糖监测的准确性。
World J Diabetes. 2024 Jun 15;15(6):1254-1262. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i6.1254.
8
The Accuracy and Precision of the Continuously Stored Data from Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Type 2 Diabetes Patients during Standard Meal Tolerance Test.2型糖尿病患者在标准餐耐量试验期间,来自动态葡萄糖监测系统的连续存储数据的准确性和精密度
Int J Endocrinol. 2020 Jan 4;2020:5947680. doi: 10.1155/2020/5947680. eCollection 2020.
9
Accuracy of a Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.专业连续血糖监测设备在 2 型糖尿病患者中的准确性。
Kobe J Med Sci. 2022 Oct 3;68(1):E5-E10.
10
Accuracy of flash glucose monitoring in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.实时动态血糖监测在 2 型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者中的准确性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 May;10(3):846-850. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12954. Epub 2018 Nov 12.