Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Endocr J. 2020 May 28;67(5):537-544. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0488. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
The Abbott FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system (FGM) is a recently introduced, but widespread continuous glucose monitoring system. While its mean absolute relative difference (MARD) value indicating its accuracy is acceptable with reference to the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) levels, few reports have examined the MARD in sensor glucose values of FGM (FGM-SG) with reference to plasma glucose (PG) levels and the factors determining it. We performed oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) in 25 Japanese subjects without diabetes. Parkes error grid analyses showed that FGM-SG with either SMBG or PG levels as a reference met International Organization for Standardization criteria. The MARD in FGM-SG with reference to SMBG levels was 10.9 ± 4.1% during OGTTs. Surprisingly, the MARD in FGM-SG with reference to PG levels was 20.3 ± 10.3% during OGTTs, revealing a discrepancy in the accuracy of FGM-SG compared with that of PG levels; moreover, the MARD showed negative correlations with fasting blood sugar level, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index, and body mass index (BMI). Multiple regression analyses revealed that BMI contributed the most to the MARD when FGM-SG and PG level were compared, as lean individuals have a greater MARD regardless of glucose levels. Inaccurate FGM data could potentially increase the risk of inappropriate treatment; consideration of such factors is critical to ensure reliable FGM values.
雅培 FreeStyle Libre 瞬感血糖监测系统(FGM)是一种最近推出但广泛应用的连续血糖监测系统。虽然其平均绝对相对差异(MARD)值表明其与自我血糖监测(SMBG)水平的准确性是可以接受的,但很少有报告研究 FGM 传感器血糖值(FGM-SG)与血浆血糖(PG)水平以及决定其准确性的因素之间的 MARD。我们对 25 名无糖尿病的日本受试者进行了口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。Parkes 误差网格分析表明,无论以 SMBG 还是 PG 水平为参考,FGM-SG 均符合国际标准化组织标准。OGTT 期间,FGM-SG 与 SMBG 水平参考的 MARD 为 10.9 ± 4.1%。令人惊讶的是,OGTT 期间,FGM-SG 与 PG 水平参考的 MARD 为 20.3 ± 10.3%,这表明 FGM-SG 的准确性与 PG 水平存在差异;此外,MARD 与空腹血糖水平、稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数和体重指数(BMI)呈负相关。多元回归分析表明,当比较 FGM-SG 和 PG 水平时,BMI 对 MARD 的影响最大,因为无论血糖水平如何,瘦个体的 MARD 都更高。不准确的 FGM 数据可能会增加治疗不当的风险;考虑到这些因素对于确保可靠的 FGM 值至关重要。