Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 31;12(2):383. doi: 10.3390/nu12020383.
Dietary record tools such as food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and food diaries (FD) are the most commonly used choices for assessing dietary intakes in most large-scale epidemiological studies. The authors developed a self-administered 360-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess dietary intakes amongst a population-based cohort in South Kerala. In the validation study ( = 460), the data were collected using FFQs that were administered on three different occasions which were then compared to 7-day food records. The intake of foods and nutrients was higher as determined by the FFQ than that assessed using food records. Spearman correlations for macro-nutrients ranged from 0.72 for protein to 0.61 for carbohydrates and for micronutrients, from 0.71 for vitamin B6 to 0.34 for magnesium. The correlation was improved with energy-adjusted nutrient intakes. On average, the exact agreement for the macronutrients ranged from 48.2% to 57.1%, and that for micronutrients ranged from 66.7% to 41.9%, with the median percentage of 49.58%. The authors conclude that the FFQ has an acceptable reproducibility, however, there was a systematic trend towards higher estimates with the FFQ for most nutrients compared to the FD records.
膳食记录工具,如食物频率问卷(FFQ)和食物日记(FD),是大多数大型流行病学研究中评估膳食摄入量最常用的选择。作者开发了一种自我管理的 360 项食物频率问卷(FFQ),以评估南喀拉拉邦人群中的膳食摄入量。在验证研究中(n=460),使用 FFQ 收集数据,FFQ 在三个不同的时间点进行管理,然后与 7 天的食物记录进行比较。FFQ 确定的食物和营养素摄入量高于食物记录评估的摄入量。宏观营养素的 Spearman 相关系数范围从蛋白质的 0.72 到碳水化合物的 0.61,而微量营养素的相关系数范围从维生素 B6 的 0.71 到镁的 0.34。通过调整能量的营养素摄入量可以提高相关性。平均而言,对于宏量营养素的准确性在 48.2%到 57.1%之间,对于微量营养素的准确性在 66.7%到 41.9%之间,中位数为 49.58%。作者得出结论,FFQ 具有可接受的可重复性,但是与 FD 记录相比,FFQ 对大多数营养素的估计值存在系统性偏高的趋势。