Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation Unit, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Oct;43(20):2930-2936. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1720319. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
To culturally adapt and validate the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (short forms) for use in Italian-speaking women with urinary incontinence.
We developed Italian versions of the two questionnaires through forward-backward translation, expert review and cognitive interviews. We then administered them to 100 women with urinary incontinence (mean age 58.02 ± 11.9 years) to assess the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change, and construct validity by hypothesis testing.
No difficulties in acceptability emerged. Internal consistency was 0.61 for Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and 0.88 for Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7. Test-retest reliability was respectively 0.79 and 0.91. The minimum detectable change was respectively 22.9 and 18.1 points (on a 0-100 scale). Nine out of 10 hypotheses regarding construct validity were confirmed.
The Italian versions of the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 showed reliability levels in line with the literature and good construct validity. Thus, we think that the present study extends the evidence for both questionnaires as useful tools for assessing women with urinary incontinence.Implications for rehabilitationThe Italian versions of the short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire have never been validated in Italian-speaking women with urinary incontinence.After translation and cross-cultural adaptation, the Italian versions of these two questionnaires showed reliability levels in line with the literature and good construct validity.The Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 produces a summary index of overall symptom distress, whereas the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 is a unidimensional questionnaire measuring the adverse effects of urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life.
对尿失禁意大利语女性使用的尿生殖窘迫量表 6 项简表和尿失禁对生活质量影响问卷 7 项简表进行文化调适和验证。
我们通过正向翻译-反向翻译、专家审查和认知访谈制定了这两个问卷的意大利语版本。然后,我们对 100 名尿失禁女性(平均年龄 58.02±11.9 岁)进行了问卷调查,以评估内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)、重测信度(组内相关系数)、测量标准误差、最小可检测变化和通过假设检验的结构效度。
接受度方面没有出现困难。尿生殖窘迫量表 6 项简表的内部一致性为 0.61,尿失禁对生活质量影响问卷 7 项简表为 0.88。重测信度分别为 0.79 和 0.91。最小可检测变化分别为 22.9 和 18.1 分(0-100 分制)。关于结构效度的 10 个假设中有 9 个得到了验证。
尿生殖窘迫量表 6 项简表和尿失禁对生活质量影响问卷 7 项简表的意大利语版本显示出与文献一致的可靠性水平和良好的结构效度。因此,我们认为本研究为这两个问卷作为评估尿失禁女性的有用工具提供了更多证据。
尿生殖窘迫量表和尿失禁对生活质量影响问卷的短表形式从未在意大利语女性中进行过验证。
经过翻译和跨文化调适,这两个问卷的意大利语版本显示出与文献一致的可靠性水平和良好的结构效度。
尿生殖窘迫量表 6 项简表产生一个总体症状困扰的综合指数,而尿失禁对生活质量影响问卷 7 项简表是一个测量尿失禁对健康相关生活质量的不良影响的一维问卷。