• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区分娩中心与三级医疗中心的合作模式。

A Collaborative Model of a Community Birth Center and a Tertiary Care Medical Center.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and the School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):696-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003723.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003723
PMID:32028505
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a collaborative model between a freestanding birth center and a tertiary care medical center.

METHODS

An interdisciplinary team developed a freestanding accredited birth center in collaboration with a tertiary care medical center in the southeast United States. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all women obtaining care at the birth center and assessed the rate (and 95% CIs) of cesarean delivery, patient transfers, and adverse maternal and neonatal events.

RESULTS

Between January 2017 and December 2018, 1,394 women initiated prenatal care at the birth center. The study cohort consisted of 1,061 women who continued their prenatal care and planned to deliver at the birth center, of whom 358 (34%) were subsequently transferred before admission and 703 (66%) presented to the birth center in labor. Of those, 573 (82%) were subsequently delivered vaginally in the birth center, and 130 (18%) were transferred for hospital birth. Of those admitted to the birth center in labor, 41 ultimately underwent cesarean delivery for an overall cesarean delivery rate of 6% (95% CI 4-8%). Maternal transfers for postpartum hemorrhage occurred in eight patients (1%; 95% CI 1-2%). There were 39 neonatal intensive care admissions (6%; 95% CI 4-8%), eight cases (1%; 95% CI 0.5-2%) of 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7, and two previable neonatal deaths (0.3%; 95% CI 0-1%).

CONCLUSION

We describe a collaborative model between a freestanding birth center and a tertiary care medical center, which provided women with access to a traditional birth center experience while maintaining access to the specialized care provided by a tertiary care medical center. We believe that the model may facilitate options for maternity care in regional perinatal systems.

摘要

目的

描述一家独立分娩中心与一家三级医疗中心之间合作模式的发展、实施和评估。

方法

一个跨学科团队在美国东南部合作建立了一家独立认可的分娩中心,并与一家三级医疗中心合作。我们对在分娩中心接受护理的所有女性进行了回顾性队列研究,并评估了剖宫产率(及其 95%置信区间)、患者转院率和母婴不良事件发生率。

结果

在 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间,共有 1394 名女性在分娩中心接受产前护理。研究队列包括 1061 名继续接受产前护理并计划在分娩中心分娩的女性,其中 358 名(34%)在入院前被转院,703 名(66%)在分娩时到分娩中心就诊。其中,573 名(82%)在分娩中心顺产分娩,130 名(18%)转院进行医院分娩。在分娩中心分娩的患者中,有 41 名最终行剖宫产,总剖宫产率为 6%(95%CI 4-8%)。有 8 名患者(1%;95%CI 1-2%)因产后出血转院。有 39 名新生儿需转入新生儿重症监护病房(6%;95%CI 4-8%),8 名新生儿(1%;95%CI 0.5-2%)出生后 5 分钟的 Apgar 评分低于 7 分,有 2 例极早产儿死亡(0.3%;95%CI 0-1%)。

结论

我们描述了一家独立分娩中心与一家三级医疗中心之间的合作模式,为女性提供了传统分娩中心的体验,同时也能获得三级医疗中心提供的专业护理。我们认为,这种模式可能有助于在区域性围产期系统中为产妇护理提供更多选择。

相似文献

1
A Collaborative Model of a Community Birth Center and a Tertiary Care Medical Center.社区分娩中心与三级医疗中心的合作模式。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):696-702. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003723.
2
Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰从初级产科单位转诊至三级医院——时间、频率、原因、紧迫性及结果:评估产科单位研究的一部分
Midwifery. 2015 Sep;31(9):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 5.
3
Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model.分娩中心的护理结果:持久模式的证明。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;58(1):3-14. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12003. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
4
Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births.在家中臀位分娩:60 例臀位和 109 例头位计划在家中和分娩中心分娩的结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2033-5.
5
Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer.独立助产单元:转诊后的母婴结局
Midwifery. 2017 Mar;46:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
6
The BirthPlace collaborative practice model: results from the San Diego Birth Center Study.“出生地”协作实践模式:圣地亚哥生育中心研究结果
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 1;5(4):207. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00147-4.
7
Results of the national study of vaginal birth after cesarean in birth centers.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩在分娩中心的全国性研究结果。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;104(5 Pt 1):933-42. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000143257.29471.82.
8
Intrapartum and Postpartum Transfers to a Tertiary Care Hospital from Out-of-Hospital Birth Settings: A Retrospective Case Series.从院外分娩环境向三级医疗机构的产时和产后转诊:一项回顾性病例系列研究
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):242-8. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12447. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
9
Perspectives on risk: Assessment of risk profiles and outcomes among women planning community birth in the United States.风险视角:美国计划在社区分娩的女性的风险概况与结局评估
Birth. 2017 Sep;44(3):209-221. doi: 10.1111/birt.12288. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
10
Factors associated with maternal intrapartum transfers from a freestanding birth centre in São Paulo, Brazil: a case control study.与巴西圣保罗独立分娩中心产妇产时转移相关的因素:一项病例对照研究。
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Consolidation of the perinatal care system and workload of obstetricians: an ecological study in Japan.围产期护理系统的整合与产科医生的工作量:日本的一项生态学研究
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Apr 28;4:1030443. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1030443. eCollection 2023.