• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用机器学习方法预测精神病院患者的预后。

Predicting patient outcomes in psychiatric hospitals with routine data: a machine learning approach.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Business Development, Evangelical Foundation Neuerkerode, Braunschweig, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1042-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-1042-2
PMID:32028934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7006066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A common problem in machine learning applications is availability of data at the point of decision making. The aim of the present study was to use routine data readily available at admission to predict aspects relevant to the organization of psychiatric hospital care. A further aim was to compare the results of a machine learning approach with those obtained through a traditional method and those obtained through a naive baseline classifier.

METHODS

The study included consecutively discharged patients between 1st of January 2017 and 31st of December 2018 from nine psychiatric hospitals in Hesse, Germany. We compared the predictive performance achieved by stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) with multiple logistic regression and a naive baseline classifier. We tested the performance of our final models on unseen patients from another calendar year and from different hospitals.

RESULTS

The study included 45,388 inpatient episodes. The models' performance, as measured by the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, varied strongly between the predicted outcomes, with relatively high performance in the prediction of coercive treatment (area under the curve: 0.83) and 1:1 observations (0.80) and relatively poor performance in the prediction of short length of stay (0.69) and non-response to treatment (0.65). The GBM performed slightly better than logistic regression. Both approaches were substantially better than a naive prediction based solely on basic diagnostic grouping.

CONCLUSION

The present study has shown that administrative routine data can be used to predict aspects relevant to the organisation of psychiatric hospital care. Future research should investigate the predictive performance that is necessary to provide effective assistance in clinical practice for the benefit of both staff and patients.

摘要

背景

机器学习应用中的一个常见问题是在决策点可用的数据。本研究的目的是使用入院时现成的常规数据来预测与精神病院护理组织相关的方面。另一个目的是将机器学习方法的结果与传统方法和朴素基线分类器的结果进行比较。

方法

该研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间德国黑森州 9 家精神病院连续出院的患者。我们比较了随机梯度增强(GBM)与多变量逻辑回归和朴素基线分类器的预测性能。我们在另一年和来自不同医院的未见过的患者上测试了我们最终模型的性能。

结果

该研究共纳入 45388 例住院患者。模型的性能,通过接收器操作特征曲线下的面积来衡量,在预测结果之间差异很大,在预测强制性治疗(曲线下面积:0.83)和 1:1 观察结果(0.80)方面表现出较高的性能,而在预测短住院时间(0.69)和治疗无反应(0.65)方面表现较差。GBM 的表现略优于逻辑回归。两种方法都明显优于仅基于基本诊断分组的朴素预测。

结论

本研究表明,行政常规数据可用于预测与精神病院护理组织相关的方面。未来的研究应调查在为员工和患者的利益提供有效的临床实践辅助方面所需的预测性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/5b42aaccc538/12911_2020_1042_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/4df8690798c6/12911_2020_1042_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/69f25af9065e/12911_2020_1042_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/eeffa4688709/12911_2020_1042_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/5b42aaccc538/12911_2020_1042_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/4df8690798c6/12911_2020_1042_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/69f25af9065e/12911_2020_1042_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/eeffa4688709/12911_2020_1042_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8688/7006066/5b42aaccc538/12911_2020_1042_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting patient outcomes in psychiatric hospitals with routine data: a machine learning approach.运用机器学习方法预测精神病院患者的预后。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1042-2.
2
Predicting the risk of drug-drug interactions in psychiatric hospitals: a retrospective longitudinal pharmacovigilance study.预测精神病医院中药物相互作用的风险:一项回顾性纵向药物警戒研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e045276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045276.
3
Predicting hospitalization following psychiatric crisis care using machine learning.运用机器学习预测精神科危机护理后的住院情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01361-1.
4
Machine Learning to Predict Mortality and Critical Events in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 in New York City: Model Development and Validation.机器学习预测纽约市新冠肺炎患者队列中的死亡率和危急事件:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e24018. doi: 10.2196/24018.
5
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
6
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Machine learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality using admission laboratory data: A retrospective, single-site study using electronic health record data.基于机器学习的入院实验室数据预测住院死亡率:一项使用电子健康记录数据的回顾性单站点研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246640. eCollection 2021.
8
Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.用于预测埃塞俄比亚 COVID-19 死亡率的机器学习算法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1728. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19196-0.
9
Predicting post-stroke pneumonia using deep neural network approaches.使用深度神经网络方法预测卒中后肺炎。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Dec;132:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103986. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
10
Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality of Adults at Time of Admission.机器学习模型对入院时成人院内死亡率的前瞻性和外部评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733.

引用本文的文献

1
Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data.预测新冠疫情前后精神病院的入院人数:一项使用常规数据的回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 23;12(1):15912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20190-y.
2
Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.与护理实践相关的数据科学趋势:对 2020 年文献的快速回顾。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):161-179. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1742218. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness.机器学习和人工智能研究如何造福患者:透明度、可重复性、伦理和有效性方面的 20 个关键问题。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 20;368:l6927. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6927.
2
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.国际乳腺癌筛查人工智能系统评估。
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
3
The "inconvenient truth" about AI in healthcare.关于医疗保健领域人工智能的“难以忽视的真相”。
药物治疗、药物相互作用和抑郁障碍中的潜在不适当药物治疗。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0255192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255192. eCollection 2021.
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Aug 16;2:77. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0155-4. eCollection 2019.
4
Making Machine Learning Models Clinically Useful.让机器学习模型在临床上发挥作用。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 8;322(14):1351-1352. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10306.
5
A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury.一种临床适用的急性肾损伤未来发生的连续预测方法。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7767):116-119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1390-1. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Beyond the hype of big data and artificial intelligence: building foundations for knowledge and wisdom.超越大数据和人工智能的炒作:为知识和智慧奠定基础。
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 17;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1382-x.
7
Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence.为人工智能支持的数字健康研究中的可操作性伦理建立案例。
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 17;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1377-7.
8
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Will the Value Match the Hype?医疗保健中的人工智能:其价值能否与炒作相匹配?
JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2281-2282. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4914.
9
Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery.大数据和机器学习算法在医疗中的应用。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):e262-e273. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30149-4.
10
Predicting one-year outcome in first episode psychosis using machine learning.使用机器学习预测首发精神病患者的一年预后。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0212846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212846. eCollection 2019.