• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

戒烟服务与资源使用中的性别差异:一项现实世界研究

Sex Differences in Use of Smoking Cessation Services and Resources: A Real-World Study.

作者信息

Jayakumar Navitha, Chaiton Michael, Zhang Bo, Selby Peter, Schwartz Robert

机构信息

Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Tob Use Insights. 2020 Jan 22;13:1179173X20901500. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20901500. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1177/1179173X20901500
PMID:32030067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6977215/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Smoking cessation interventions with sex considerations have been found to effectively increase cessation rates. However, evidence is limited and weak. This study examined sex differences in the use of smoking cessation services or resources among Ontario adults.

METHODS

Data are from the Smokers' Panel, an ongoing online survey of Ontario adult smokers and recent quitters. The analysis included 1009 male and 1765 female participants. Bivariate analysis was used to examine differences in sociodemographic characteristics and smoking-related variables by use of cessation services/resources. Logistic regression was then used to identify sociodemographic characteristics and smoking-related variables associated with the use of cessation services/resources.

RESULTS

The analysis shows that there were significant sex differences in the use of individual interventions. Female participants were more likely to use nicotine patch (63% vs 58%; adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.67), varenicline (29% vs 24%; AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.66), Smokers' Helpline phone (14% vs 10%; AOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.79), Smokers' Helpline online (27% vs 21%; AOR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.18-1.74), self-help materials (23% vs 16%; AOR: 1.81 95% CI: 1.46-2.26), and alternative methods (23% vs 19%; AOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73) compared with male participants, after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with other findings, the study shows sex differences in the use of smoking cessation services or resources among adult smokers. Women are more likely to use recommended cessation resources such as nicotine patch, varenicline, and Smokers' Helpline than men. Health professionals should use this increased willingness to help female smokers quit. However, men may be underserved and more men-specific interventions need to be developed and evaluated.

摘要

目的

已发现考虑性别的戒烟干预措施能有效提高戒烟率。然而,相关证据有限且不充分。本研究调查了安大略省成年人在使用戒烟服务或资源方面的性别差异。

方法

数据来自吸烟者小组,这是一项对安大略省成年吸烟者和近期戒烟者进行的持续在线调查。分析纳入了1009名男性和1765名女性参与者。采用双变量分析来检验使用戒烟服务/资源在社会人口学特征和吸烟相关变量方面的差异。然后使用逻辑回归来确定与使用戒烟服务/资源相关的社会人口学特征和吸烟相关变量。

结果

分析表明,在使用个体干预措施方面存在显著的性别差异。在调整协变量后,与男性参与者相比,女性参与者更有可能使用尼古丁贴片(63%对58%;调整后的优势比,AOR:1.39,95%置信区间[CI]:1.16 - 1.67)、伐尼克兰(29%对24%;AOR:1.37,95% CI:1.13 - 1.66)、吸烟者帮助热线电话(14%对10%;AOR:1.39,95% CI:1.07 - 1.79)、吸烟者帮助热线在线服务(27%对21%;AOR 1.43,95% CI:1.18 - 1.74)、自助材料(2 for 23%对16%;AOR:1.81,95% CI:1.46 - 2.26)以及替代方法(23%对19%;AOR:1.40,95% CI:1.14 - 1.73)。

结论

与其他研究结果一致,本研究表明成年吸烟者在使用戒烟服务或资源方面存在性别差异。女性比男性更有可能使用推荐的戒烟资源,如尼古丁贴片、伐尼克兰和吸烟者帮助热线。卫生专业人员应利用女性这种更高的意愿来帮助她们戒烟。然而,男性可能未得到充分服务,需要开发和评估更多针对男性的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Use of Smoking Cessation Services and Resources: A Real-World Study.戒烟服务与资源使用中的性别差异:一项现实世界研究
Tob Use Insights. 2020 Jan 22;13:1179173X20901500. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20901500. eCollection 2020.
2
Gender differences in the real-world effectiveness of smoking cessation medications: Findings from the 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey.戒烟药物在现实世界中的有效性的性别差异:来自2010 - 2011年《当前人口调查烟草使用补充调查》的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:485-491. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.046. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Medications: A National Prospective Cohort From Taiwan.戒烟药物的比较疗效:来自台湾的一项全国前瞻性队列研究
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0166992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166992. eCollection 2016.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in smoking-cessation interventions: analysis of the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.戒烟干预措施中的种族和民族差异:对2005年美国国家健康访谈调查的分析
Am J Prev Med. 2008 May;34(5):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.003.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Varenicline and Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smoking Cessation in Older and Younger Smokers: A Prospective Cohort in Taiwan.在台湾,对老年和年轻吸烟者而言,伐伦克林与尼古丁替代疗法戒烟的效果比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(2):149-155. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx275.
7
Twelve-Month Outcomes of a Group-Randomized Community Health Advocate-Led Smoking Cessation Intervention in Public Housing.社区健康倡导员主导的戒烟干预措施:一项为期 12 个月的群组随机对照试验结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Nov 15;20(12):1434-1441. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx193.
8
Effects of Nicotine Patch vs Varenicline vs Combination Nicotine Replacement Therapy on Smoking Cessation at 26 Weeks: A Randomized Clinical Trial.尼古丁贴片与伐尼克兰对比联合尼古丁替代疗法对26周戒烟效果的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2016 Jan 26;315(4):371-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.19284.
9
Levels of exhaled carbon monoxide measured during an intervention program predict 1-year smoking cessation: a retrospective observational cohort study.干预计划期间测量的呼气一氧化碳水平可预测 1 年的戒烟率:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Oct 16;27(1):59. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0060-8.
10
What Factors are Associated With Waterpipe Smoking Cessation? A Secondary Data Analysis.哪些因素与水烟戒烟有关?一项二次数据分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):581-589. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab234.

引用本文的文献

1
Depicting growth characteristics with computed tomography for KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.利用计算机断层扫描描绘KRAS突变型肺腺癌的生长特征。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):3942-3949. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1880. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
2
Racial/ethnic discrimination and racial trauma: Concurrent evaluation among Black adults who smoke in the United States.种族/族裔歧视与种族创伤:美国吸烟黑人成年人的并发评估
Psychol Addict Behav. 2025 Jun;39(4):332-344. doi: 10.1037/adb0001046. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
Prevalence and disparities in receiving medical advice to quit tobacco use in the US adult population.美国成年人群体中接受戒烟医疗建议的比例及差异。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;12:1383060. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383060. eCollection 2024.
4
Testing the feasibility of the QuitAid smoking cessation intervention in a randomized factorial design in an independent, rural community pharmacy.在一个独立的农村社区药房,采用随机析因设计测试戒烟辅助戒烟干预措施的可行性。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Feb 26;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01465-9.
5
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2023 Dec 10;195(48):E1674-E1701. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230237-f.
6
Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity.促进健康公平的预防保健建议。
CMAJ. 2023 Sep 25;195(37):E1250-E1273. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230237.
7
Daily adherence to nicotine replacement therapy in low-income smokers: The role of gender, negative mood, motivation, and self-efficacy.低收入吸烟者中尼古丁替代疗法的日常依从性:性别、负面情绪、动机和自我效能的作用。
Addict Behav. 2023 Mar;138:107543. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107543. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
Predictors of perceived success in quitting smoking by vaping: A machine learning approach.基于机器学习的预测电子烟戒烟成功的相关因素
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262407. eCollection 2022.
9
Methods Used in Smoking Cessation and Reduction Attempts: Findings from Help-Seeking Smokers.戒烟及减少吸烟尝试中使用的方法:寻求帮助的吸烟者的调查结果
J Smok Cessat. 2021 Mar 9;2021:6670628. doi: 10.1155/2021/6670628. eCollection 2021.
10
Gender differences within the barriers to smoking cessation and the preferences for interventions in primary care a qualitative study using focus groups in The Hague, The Netherlands.戒烟障碍中的性别差异以及初级保健中干预措施的偏好:一项在荷兰海牙使用焦点小组的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):e042623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042623.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of enhancing a Quit-and-Win smoking cessation program for college students.提高大学生戒烟赢奖计划的成本效益。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1319-1333. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0977-z. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
2
Trend differences in men and women in rural and urban U.S. settings.美国城乡环境中男性和女性的趋势差异。
Prev Med. 2018 Dec;117:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Sex/gender differences in smoking cessation: A review.戒烟中的性别差异:综述
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers.在一组吸烟的纵向队列中,估算成功戒烟所需的尝试戒烟次数。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 9;6(6):e011045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011045.
5
Women and Smoking: The Effect of Gender on the Epidemiology, Health Effects, and Cessation of Smoking.女性与吸烟:性别对吸烟流行病学、健康影响及戒烟的作用
Curr Addict Rep. 2014 Mar;1(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s40429-013-0003-6. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
6
Evaluation of QuitNow Men: An Online, Men-Centered Smoking Cessation Intervention.对“立即戒烟男性项目”的评估:一项以男性为中心的在线戒烟干预措施。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 20;18(4):e83. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5076.
7
Racial Differences in Tobacco Cessation and Treatment Usage After Lung Screening: An Examination of the National Lung Screening Trial.肺部筛查后戒烟及治疗使用情况的种族差异:对国家肺部筛查试验的一项研究
Oncologist. 2016 Jan;21(1):40-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0325. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Profiles of importance, readiness and confidence in quitting tobacco use.戒烟的重要性、意愿和信心概况。
J Subst Use. 2013 Apr;18(2):75-81. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2011.606351.
9
Better Off Alone Than With a Smoker: The Influence of Partner's Smoking Behavior in Later Life.与其与吸烟者在一起,不如独自生活:伴侣吸烟行为对晚年生活的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Jul;71(4):687-97. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu220. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
10
Comparison of smoking cessation between education groups: findings from 2 US National Surveys over 2 decades.不同教育程度组戒烟情况的比较:来自美国20多年间两项全国性调查的结果。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Feb;105(2):373-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302222.