Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Italy.
NEUROFARBA, University of Firenze, Italy.
J Health Psychol. 2021 Oct;26(12):2131-2142. doi: 10.1177/1359105320903098. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
The relationship between objective and subjective sleep quality is still debated. Here, we investigate differences in objective sleep parameters in habitual subjective good sleepers and bad sleepers with the aim of evaluating sleep continuity, stability and organization as possible determinants of subjective sleep quality. In total, 38 subjects (good sleepers, = 18; bad sleepers, = 20) underwent two nights of sleep recording. Traditional sleep parameters displayed no between-groups differences. Conversely, bad sleepers showed lower sleep continuity (awakenings frequency), stability (e.g. arousals and state transitions frequency) and organization (e.g. number of sleep cycles and time spent in cycles). Our findings point to the involvement of these measures in determining habitual sleep quality perception and suggest the possibility to include them in standard sleep assessments.
客观和主观睡眠质量之间的关系仍存在争议。在这里，我们研究了习惯性主观睡眠良好者和睡眠不良者的客观睡眠参数差异，目的是评估睡眠连续性、稳定性和组织作为主观睡眠质量的可能决定因素。共有 38 名受试者（良好睡眠者，n=18；睡眠不良者，n=20）进行了两晚的睡眠记录。传统的睡眠参数在组间没有差异。相反，睡眠不良者的睡眠连续性（觉醒频率）、稳定性（例如觉醒和状态转换频率）和组织（例如睡眠周期数和在周期中度过的时间）较低。我们的研究结果表明，这些措施参与了习惯性睡眠质量感知的决定，并提出了将其纳入标准睡眠评估的可能性。
