Duraes Eliana F R, Schwarz Graham S, de Sousa Joao Batista, Duraes Leonardo C, Morisada Megan, Baker Todd, Djohan Risal S, Bernard Steven L, Moreira Andrea A
From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
University of Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 May;84(5):494-506. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002157.
The most important purpose of reconstruction is to increase or restore the patient's quality of life (QOL). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the QOL and aesthetic outcomes of patients after autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction.
Patients who underwent breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2011 were included. The Breast-Q, a validated breast reconstruction QOL questionnaire, was used along with postoperative photographs panel analyses using a multiparameter breast-specific aesthetic outcome scale and retrospective evaluation of demographic and treatment data.
Of 820 patients, 261 complete questionnaires were evaluated. On the multivariable linear regression, the "satisfaction with breasts" was positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, whereas radiation therapy (RTx), the time between the reconstruction and the questionnaire, and the number of surgeries due to complications were negative factors (adjusted R = 0.183; P < 0.001). The same factors influenced the "satisfaction with the outcomes." The mean "overall breast appearance" was also positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, and RTx and the total number of surgeries were negative predictive factors (adjusted R = 0.311, P < 0.001).
The aesthetic result and QOL after breast reconstruction for breast cancer treatment are positively influenced by the use of autologous tissue and bilaterality. Factors that negatively influenced the aesthetic result and the QOL include use of RTx, a higher number of surgeries needed for the reconstruction, reoperations due to complications, higher body mass index, and a longer time elapsed between reconstruction and the questionnaire.
重建的最重要目的是提高或恢复患者的生活质量(QOL)。我们研究的目的是评估自体乳房重建与植入物乳房重建术后患者的生活质量和美学效果。
纳入2009年至2011年间接受乳房重建的患者。使用经过验证的乳房重建生活质量问卷Breast-Q,同时结合使用多参数乳房特异性美学效果量表对术后照片进行小组分析,并对人口统计学和治疗数据进行回顾性评估。
在820例患者中,对261份完整问卷进行了评估。在多变量线性回归分析中,“对乳房的满意度”受到自体和双侧重建的积极影响,而放射治疗(RTx)、重建与问卷之间的时间间隔以及因并发症进行的手术次数则是负面因素(调整后的R = 0.183;P < 0.001)。相同的因素影响“对结果的满意度”。“整体乳房外观”的平均值也受到自体和双侧重建的积极影响,而RTx和手术总数是负面预测因素(调整后的R = 0.311,P < 0.001)。
乳腺癌治疗乳房重建后的美学效果和生活质量受到自体组织的使用和双侧性的积极影响。对美学效果和生活质量产生负面影响的因素包括RTx的使用、重建所需的手术次数较多、因并发症进行的再次手术、较高的体重指数以及重建与问卷之间经过的时间较长。