Student Research Committee, School of Paramedical Sciences, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran; Department of Radiology Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; Department of Radiologic Sciences, Medical Physics, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Sep;101(9):599-610. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models to classify osteoporosis, osteopenia and normal patients using radiomics and machine learning approaches.
A total of 147 patients were included in this retrospective single-center study. There were 12 men and 135 women with a mean age of 56.88±10.6 (SD) years (range: 28-87 years). For each patient, seven regions including four lumbar and three femoral including trochanteric, intertrochanteric and neck were segmented on bone mineral densitometry images and 54 texture features were extracted from the regions. The performance of four feature selection methods, including classifier attribute evaluation (CLAE), one rule attribute evaluation (ORAE), gain ratio attribute evaluation (GRAE) and principal components analysis (PRCA) along with four classification methods, including random forest (RF), random committee (RC), K-nearest neighbor (KN) and logit-boost (LB) were evaluated. Four classification categories, including osteopenia vs. normal, osteoporosis vs. normal, osteopenia vs. osteoporosis and osteoporosis+osteopenia vs. osteoporosis were examined for the defined seven regions. The classification model performances were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).
The AUC values ranged from 0.50 to 0.78. The combination of methods RF+CLAE, RF+ORAE and RC+ORAE yielded highest performance (AUC=0.78) in discriminating between osteoporosis and normal state in the trochanteric region. The combinations of RF+PRCA and LB+PRCA had the highest performance (AUC=0.76) in discriminating between osteoporosis and normal state in the neck region.
The machine learning radiomic approach can be considered as a new method for bone mineral deficiency disease classification using bone mineral densitometry image features.
本研究旨在开发基于放射组学和机器学习方法的预测模型,以对骨质疏松症、骨量减少和正常患者进行分类。
本回顾性单中心研究共纳入 147 例患者,其中男性 12 例,女性 135 例,平均年龄 56.88±10.6(SD)岁(范围:28-87 岁)。对每位患者的骨密度仪图像进行 7 个部位(包括 4 个腰椎和 3 个股骨部位,包括转子间、转子下和颈)的分割,并从这些部位提取 54 个纹理特征。评估了 4 种特征选择方法(包括分类器属性评估(CLAE)、单一规则属性评估(ORAE)、增益比属性评估(GRAE)和主成分分析(PRCA))和 4 种分类方法(包括随机森林(RF)、随机委员会(RC)、K-最近邻(KN)和对数几率增强(LB))的性能。对定义的 7 个部位进行了 4 种分类类别(骨量减少与正常、骨质疏松与正常、骨量减少与骨质疏松、骨质疏松+骨量减少与骨质疏松)的评估。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估分类模型性能。
AUC 值范围为 0.50 至 0.78。在转子间区域,RF+CLAE、RF+ORAE 和 RC+ORAE 联合方法在区分骨质疏松症与正常状态方面具有最佳性能(AUC=0.78)。在颈区,RF+PRCA 和 LB+PRCA 联合方法在区分骨质疏松症与正常状态方面具有最佳性能(AUC=0.76)。
基于机器学习的放射组学方法可以被认为是一种利用骨密度仪图像特征对骨矿物质缺乏性疾病进行分类的新方法。