• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新损伤严重程度特征描述的进展:严重程度概况。

Progress toward a new injury severity characterization: severity profiles.

作者信息

Sacco W J, Jameson J W, Copes W S, Lawnick M M, Keast S L, Champion H R

机构信息

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 1988;18(6):419-29. doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(88)90059-5.

DOI:10.1016/0010-4825(88)90059-5
PMID:3203503
Abstract

Presented is a new seven-dimensional injury severity profile. The profile includes three physiologic assessments and four variables which express the number, location, and severity of a patient's injuries in terms of 'Abbreviated injury scale' values. The physiologic assessments are coded values for the 'Glasgow coma scale', systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate. Also presented are survival-death predictive values of a cluster model based on survival rates of clusters of profiles of 2569 blunt-injured and penetrating-injured patients. The cluster model has a relative information gain (R) of 0.90. R is a measure of predictive value relative to an infallible predictor. It varies from 0 to 1, the higher the value the better the predictive value. The model had 26 false negatives (deaths predicted to survive) and 35 false positives (survivors predicted to die) giving rise to a false negative rate of 9.3%, a false positive rate of 1.4% and a misclassification rate of 2.4%. The R value and false negative rate are particularly noteworthy, the R value being higher than, and the false negative rate much lower than typical values of 30-40% achieved by TRISS (a combination index based on trauma score, injury severity score and patient age). Also noteworthy is that the clustering was independent of survival/death outcome information and that the good results were achieved even though patient age has not yet been incorporated into the model.

摘要

本文介绍了一种新的七维损伤严重程度概况。该概况包括三项生理评估和四个变量,这些变量根据“简明损伤定级标准”的值来表示患者损伤的数量、位置和严重程度。生理评估是“格拉斯哥昏迷量表”、收缩压和呼吸频率的编码值。文中还给出了基于2569名钝器伤和穿透伤患者概况聚类生存率的聚类模型的生存-死亡预测值。该聚类模型的相对信息增益(R)为0.90。R是相对于完美预测器的预测值度量。其取值范围为0到1,值越高预测价值越好。该模型有26例假阴性(预测存活但实际死亡)和35例假阳性(预测死亡但实际存活),假阴性率为9.3%,假阳性率为1.4%,错误分类率为2.4%。R值和假阴性率特别值得注意,R值高于TRISS(一种基于创伤评分、损伤严重程度评分和患者年龄的综合指数)通常达到的30%-40%的值,假阴性率则远低于该值。同样值得注意的是,聚类独立于生存/死亡结局信息,并且即使患者年龄尚未纳入模型,仍取得了良好的结果。

相似文献

1
Progress toward a new injury severity characterization: severity profiles.新损伤严重程度特征描述的进展:严重程度概况。
Comput Biol Med. 1988;18(6):419-29. doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(88)90059-5.
2
Injury severity and probability of survival assessment in trauma patients using a predictive hierarchical network model derived from ICD-9 codes.使用从ICD - 9编码派生的预测分层网络模型评估创伤患者的损伤严重程度和生存概率。
J Trauma. 1995 Apr;38(4):590-7; discussion 597-601. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199504000-00022.
3
A new characterization of injury severity.损伤严重程度的一种新表征。
J Trauma. 1990 May;30(5):539-45; discussion 545-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199005000-00003.
4
New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.新创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)调整以进行生存预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Mar 6;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0171-8. eCollection 2018.
5
Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available.结合最新进展,使创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法普遍可用。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):1002-8; discussion 1008-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000215827.54546.01.
6
Comparison of the Injury Severity Score and ICD-9 diagnosis codes as predictors of outcome in injury: analysis of 44,032 patients.损伤严重程度评分与ICD - 9诊断编码作为损伤预后预测指标的比较:对44,032例患者的分析
J Trauma. 1997 Mar;42(3):477-87; discussion 487-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199703000-00016.
7
Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.创伤严重程度特征化评分(ASCOT)相较于创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)的预测改进:一项独立评估结果
J Trauma. 1996 Jan;40(1):42-8; discussion 48-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199601000-00009.
8
The Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG) and Prediction of Mortality Outcome in Adult Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on Registered Trauma Data.反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分(rSIG)与成人创伤患者死亡率预测的关系:基于注册创伤数据的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 24;15(11):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112346.
9
Controlling for the severity of injuries in emergency medicine research.在急诊医学研究中控制损伤的严重程度。
Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;8(6):484-91. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90147-r.
10
Epidemiological and Trauma Injury and Severity Score (TRISS) analysis of trauma patients at a tertiary care centre in India.印度一家三级医疗中心创伤患者的流行病学及创伤损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)分析
Natl Med J India. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):186-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting mortality in severe polytrauma with limited resources.有限资源条件下严重多发伤患者的死亡率预测。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Oct;28(10):1404-1411. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.70138.
2
Artificial intelligence to predict in-hospital mortality using novel anatomical injury score.利用新型解剖损伤评分预测院内死亡率的人工智能。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 7;11(1):23534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03024-1.
3
Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools.系统评价损伤严重程度评分工具的预测性能。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Sep 10;20:63. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-63.
4
Evaluations of hospital and/or trauma care systems.医院和/或创伤护理系统评估
Arch Emerg Med. 1989 Sep;6(3):165-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.6.3.165.