UCLA Semel Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Apr;123:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
Significant efforts have been undertaken to characterize the phenomenology of the high-risk period for bipolar disorder (BD) through the examination of youth at familial risk (i.e., having a first- or second-degree relative with BD) or clinical high risk for the disorder (i.e., youth with BD Not Otherwise Specified [NOS] or major depressive disorder [MDD]). However, little is known about the phenomenology of youth at both familial and clinical high risk for BD. In this study, we examined the clinical and psychosocial characteristics of youth at familial and clinical high risk (HR) for BD, and compared these characteristics to those of youth with BD I and II. Both groups were recruited based on current, active mood symptoms from separate randomized trials of family therapy. A total of 127 HR youth were evaluated: 52 (40.9%) were diagnosed with BD-NOS and 75 (59.1%) were diagnosed with MDD. Compared to adolescents with BD I and II (n = 145), HR youth had higher rates of anxiety disorders, and comparable rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder. Manic symptom severity and psychosocial functioning were progressively more impaired consistent with diagnostic severity: BD I > BD II > BD-NOS > MDD. Nonetheless, HR youth exhibited depressive symptom severity that was comparable to adolescents with BD I. These results provide further support for the high rates of anxiety disorders and premorbid dysfunction in addition to active mood symptoms for youth at risk for BD, and suggest anxiety is an important phenomenological characteristic and treatment target in the high-risk period.
人们已经做出了巨大的努力来描述双相情感障碍(BD)高危期的现象学,方法是检查具有家族风险(即一级或二级亲属患有 BD)或具有该疾病临床高风险的年轻人(即患有未特定为 BD 的 BD [NOS]或重度抑郁症 [MDD]的年轻人)。然而,对于同时具有家族和临床高风险的年轻人的现象学知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们检查了具有家族和临床双相情感障碍高风险(HR)的年轻人的临床和心理社会特征,并将这些特征与患有 I 型和 II 型双相情感障碍的年轻人进行了比较。两组都是根据独立的家庭治疗随机试验中当前的活跃情绪症状招募的。共评估了 127 名 HR 年轻人:52 名(40.9%)被诊断为 BDNOS,75 名(59.1%)被诊断为 MDD。与患有 I 型和 II 型双相情感障碍的青少年(n=145)相比,HR 年轻人的焦虑障碍发生率更高,而注意力缺陷/多动障碍和对立违抗性障碍/品行障碍的发生率相当。躁狂症状严重程度和心理社会功能随着诊断严重程度的增加而逐渐受损:I 型 BD > II 型 BD > BDNOS > MDD。尽管如此,HR 年轻人表现出的抑郁症状严重程度与患有 I 型双相情感障碍的青少年相当。这些结果进一步支持了高危期患有 BD 的年轻人除了活跃的情绪症状外,还具有高焦虑障碍和发病前功能障碍的发生率,这表明焦虑是高危期的一个重要现象学特征和治疗目标。