• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扫描体的类型和形状会影响数字化种植体印模的准确性和时间吗?

Do Type and Shape of Scan Bodies Affect Accuracy and Time of Digital Implant Impressions?

作者信息

Moslemion M, Payaminia L, Jalali H, Alikhasi M

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

出版信息

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020 Feb 27;28(1):18-27. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_1962Moslemion10.

DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_1962Moslemion10
PMID:32036633
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Reports concerning the accuracy of intraoral digital impression systems are limited. This study aimed to assess the effects of scan body types and shapes on digital impression accuracy and scanning time in all-on-four restorations.

METHODS

This in vitro study was conducted with two acrylic maxillary models. Two implant systems with different connection types (internal trilobe and external hexagon connection) were inserted according to the all-on-four design. Scanning was performed using Doowon, NT-Trading, and DESS scan bodies. Changes in implants' positions (ΔR) and angulation (ΔA), and the implants' distance from the reference pin (ΔD) compared with the actual model were determined. Scanning times were also measured and compared.

RESULTS

The effects of implant connections and scan bodies on ΔR and ΔA were significant (p ⟨0.05). Implant angulation could also affect ΔA (p=0.019). ΔD was only affected by scan body (p ⟨0.001). The three scan bodies were significantly different in terms of scanning time (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that scan body type and shape, and implant connection and angulation could affect digital impression accuracy in all-on-four restorations. For both internal and external connections, the NT-Trading and DESS scan bodies had the shortest and longest scanning times, respectively.

摘要

目的

关于口腔内数字印模系统准确性的报告有限。本研究旨在评估扫描体类型和形状对全口四颗种植修复中数字印模准确性和扫描时间的影响。

方法

本体外研究使用了两个丙烯酸上颌模型。根据全口四颗种植设计植入两种具有不同连接类型(内部三叶形和外部六边形连接)的种植系统。使用斗源、NT-Trading和DESS扫描体进行扫描。确定与实际模型相比种植体位置的变化(ΔR)、角度的变化(ΔA)以及种植体与参考针的距离(ΔD)。还测量并比较了扫描时间。

结果

种植体连接和扫描体对ΔR和ΔA的影响具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。种植体角度也会影响ΔA(p = 0.019)。ΔD仅受扫描体影响(p<0.001)。三种扫描体在扫描时间方面存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。

结论

结果表明,扫描体类型和形状、种植体连接和角度会影响全口四颗种植修复中的数字印模准确性。对于内部和外部连接,NT-Trading和DESS扫描体的扫描时间分别最短和最长。

相似文献

1
Do Type and Shape of Scan Bodies Affect Accuracy and Time of Digital Implant Impressions?扫描体的类型和形状会影响数字化种植体印模的准确性和时间吗?
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020 Feb 27;28(1):18-27. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_1962Moslemion10.
2
Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study.不同扫描体部和扫描策略对口腔内扫描仪数字印模精度影响的体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;29(4):309-314. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13131. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth.基于平行共焦激光技术的数字印模系统用于种植体的准确性,并考虑了操作者经验、种植体角度和深度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):853-62. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3343.
4
Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Dental Implant Impressions.数字化与传统牙种植体印模临床准确性的比较
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020 Nov 30;28(4):173-181. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_02028Rutkunas09.
5
The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同牙种植体支持式义齿印模技术的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:374-392. doi: 10.1111/clr.13273.
6
The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants.印模技术和种植体角度对内外连接种植体印模精度的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1422-8.
7
Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.基于主动波前采样技术的数字化印模系统在种植体方面的准确性,考虑操作者经验、种植体角度和深度。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:e54-64. doi: 10.1111/cid.12124. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
8
Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters.基于共聚焦显微镜的两种数字种植体印模系统在定制软件和临床参数变化时的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):56-64. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3689.
9
Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: A crossover randomized trial.数字化和传统种植体水平印模技术用于上颌全口螺钉固位义齿的准确性:一项交叉随机试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Aug;26(4):714-723. doi: 10.1111/cid.13336. Epub 2024 May 10.
10
Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.不同数字化扫描技术和扫描体在全口种植义齿修复中的精度研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Scan Body Geometry on the Precision and the Trueness of Implant Impressions Using Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review.扫描体几何形状对使用口内扫描仪的种植体印模精度和准确性的影响:一项系统评价。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 5;13(6):252. doi: 10.3390/dj13060252.
2
The Effect of Angulation and Scan Body Position on Scans for Implant-Treated Edentulism: A Clinical Simulation Study.角度和扫描体位置对种植治疗无牙颌扫描的影响:一项临床模拟研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Apr;27(2):e70001. doi: 10.1111/cid.70001.
3
A Retrospective Cohort Study on Scan Quality of Implant Scanbodies Matched With CAD Libraries.
一项关于与计算机辅助设计(CAD)库匹配的种植体扫描体扫描质量的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e70017. doi: 10.1111/cid.70017.
4
Effect of saliva on accuracy of digital dental implant transfer using two different materials of intraoral scan bodies with different exposed lengths.唾液对两种不同暴露长度的口内扫描体的数字化牙种植体转移准确性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 23;24(1):1428. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05199-1.
5
Accuracy of maxillary full-arch digital impressions of tooth and implant models made by two intraoral scanners.两种口腔内扫描仪制作的上颌全牙弓牙齿及种植体模型数字印模的准确性
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Apr;10(2):e857. doi: 10.1002/cre2.857.
6
Influence of scanbody design and intraoral scanner on the trueness of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study.扫描体设计和口内扫描仪对全牙弓种植体数字印模精度的影响:一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 19;18(12):e0295790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295790. eCollection 2023.
7
Accuracy of digitally coded healing abutments: A systematic review.数字化编码愈合基台的准确性:一项系统评价。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Dec;35(8):891-903. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Trueness of digital implant impressions based on implant angulation and scan body materials.基于种植体角度和扫描体材料的数字化种植体印模的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 8;11(1):21892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01442-9.
9
Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study.12 种口内扫描仪在全颌种植体印模中的准确性:一项比较性的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01254-9.
10
Congruence between Meshes and Library Files of Implant Scanbodies: An In Vitro Study Comparing Five Intraoral Scanners.种植体扫描体的模型与库文件之间的一致性:一项比较五款口内扫描仪的体外研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 9;9(7):2174. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072174.