Mortimer D, Goel N, Shu M A
University of Calgary Health Sciences Centre, Alberta, Canada.
Fertil Steril. 1988 Dec;50(6):960-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60381-3.
The sperm concentration and percentage motility values generated by version 3.2 of the CellSoft (Cryo Resources Ltd., New York, NY) automated semen analyzer on 200 ejaculates were compared with those obtained by standardized traditional methods. Overall, CellSoft gave mean concentrations that were 20.9 x 10(6)/ml lower (95% range of differences = -112.6 to +154.4 x 10(6)/ml). However, the difference between methods was not systematic. Below 50 x 10(6)/ml, CellSoft more often gave higher values, and above 100 x 10(6)/ml, it usually gave lower values. In the middle range, differences were randomly distributed. For motility, the CellSoft values were usually higher than those obtained by visual counting (mean difference = -17.5%, 95% range = -56.0% to +21.0%). Multiple regression analyses revealed a strong concentration dependency such that reliable values will probably be obtained only if all samples are diluted (with homologous seminal plasma) before CellSoft analysis. This upper concentration limit is of the order of 30 to 50 x 10(6)/ml. Without such dilution, this version of CellSoft will not provide sufficiently accurate values for basic semen characteristics and cannot be accepted as a routine diagnostic method.
将CellSoft(纽约州纽约市Cryo Resources有限公司)3.2版本自动精液分析仪对200份射精样本生成的精子浓度和活力百分比值,与通过标准化传统方法获得的值进行了比较。总体而言,CellSoft给出的平均浓度低20.9×10⁶/ml(差异的95%范围=-112.6至+154.4×10⁶/ml)。然而,两种方法之间的差异并不具有系统性。在50×10⁶/ml以下,CellSoft给出的值往往更高;在100×10⁶/ml以上,它给出的值通常更低。在中间范围内,差异是随机分布的。对于活力,CellSoft的值通常高于通过目视计数获得的值(平均差异=-17.5%,95%范围=-56.0%至+21.0%)。多元回归分析显示出强烈的浓度依赖性,以至于可能只有在对所有样本进行(用同源精浆)稀释后再进行CellSoft分析,才能获得可靠的值。这个浓度上限约为30至50×10⁶/ml。如果不进行这样的稀释,这个版本的CellSoft将无法为基本精液特征提供足够准确的值,不能被接受作为常规诊断方法。