• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性行动:一项社区能力建设干预研究方案,旨在为 50 岁以上男性开发和实施性别敏感的体育活动项目。

ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus.

机构信息

Instiute of Sports Science, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.

Department for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 24;8:4. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004
PMID:32039133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6992606/
Abstract

Capacity building for health promotion is a relevant precondition for sustainable, health-related changes in community settings. So far, there are few evidence-based recommendations about how to implement and evaluate community capacity building approaches. ACTION for men (A4M) is a project designed to build and evaluate capacities for health promotion in three rural communities in Bavaria, Germany, via a participatory approach including multiple community stakeholders. The project specifically aims at improving physical activity (PA) in men over 50 years of age (50 plus). As a strategy to build the communities' capacities, we set up stakeholder groups in so far two communities. Those stakeholder groups will be facilitated over a period of 1-3 years. In regular meetings, the group members will be motivated to actively participate in planning and implementing PA programs for men 50 plus. The facilitation will systematically address key domains of community capacity (e.g., critical awareness, problem assessment, resource mobilization). The evaluation of the capacity building processes will be carried out using a mixed-methods design. Evaluation instruments consist of structured documentations and face-to-face interviews with stakeholder group participants (and drop-outs) as well as a pre-post-test using a standardized questionnaire in order to detect activity-related changes in men 50 plus from the involved communities. In community three, we will conduct the same procedure with a delay of 6 months. Building community capacity for health promotion programs is the primary aim in A4M, and thus differs from previous research in which capacity is mostly a means to an end or an "incidental" result of a health promotion program. Therefore, A4M is expected to deliver important findings about how to implement and evaluate capacity building processes for health promotion, as well as how to address physical activity in community settings.

摘要

促进健康的能力建设是在社区环境中实现可持续、与健康相关的变革的相关前提。到目前为止,关于如何实施和评估社区能力建设方法,几乎没有基于证据的建议。ACTION for men (A4M) 是一个旨在通过包括多个社区利益相关者的参与式方法,在德国巴伐利亚州的三个农村社区中建立和评估健康促进能力的项目。该项目特别旨在提高 50 岁以上男性的身体活动(PA)。作为建立社区能力的策略,我们在迄今为止的两个社区中成立了利益相关者小组。这些利益相关者小组将在 1-3 年内得到促进。在定期会议上,小组成员将被激励积极参与为 50 岁以上男性规划和实施 PA 计划。促进将系统地解决社区能力的关键领域(例如,批判性意识、问题评估、资源调动)。将使用混合方法设计来评估能力建设过程。评估工具包括对利益相关者小组成员(以及辍学者)进行结构化记录和面对面访谈,以及使用标准化问卷进行前后测试,以检测来自参与社区的 50 岁以上男性的与活动相关的变化。在社区三,我们将延迟 6 个月进行相同的程序。在 A4M 中,促进健康计划的社区能力建设是主要目标,因此与之前的研究不同,之前的研究中能力大多是达到目的的手段或健康促进计划的“偶然”结果。因此,A4M 有望提供有关如何实施和评估健康促进能力建设过程以及如何在社区环境中解决身体活动问题的重要发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fa/6992606/8c1eca1221fa/fpubh-08-00004-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fa/6992606/8c1eca1221fa/fpubh-08-00004-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16fa/6992606/8c1eca1221fa/fpubh-08-00004-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus.男性行动:一项社区能力建设干预研究方案,旨在为 50 岁以上男性开发和实施性别敏感的体育活动项目。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 24;8:4. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004. eCollection 2020.
2
Capacity Building in Community Stakeholder Groups for Increasing Physical Activity: Results of a Qualitative Study in Two German Communities.社区利益相关者群体在提高身体活动水平方面的能力建设:在两个德国社区进行的定性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):2306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072306.
3
Capacity building in participatory stakeholder groups: results from a German research consortium on active lifestyles.参与式利益相关者群体的能力建设:德国积极生活方式研究联盟的成果。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii65-ii78. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab165.
4
How Health Promoters Can Assess Capacity Building Processes in Setting-Based Approaches-Development and Testing of a Monitoring Instrument.健康促进者如何评估基于场所的方法中的能力建设过程——监测工具的开发和测试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;17(2):407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020407.
5
Building on a YMCA's health and physical activity promotion capacities: A case study of a researcher-organization partnership to optimize adolescent programming_.基于基督教青年会的健康与体育活动推广能力:一项关于研究人员与组织合作优化青少年项目的案例研究
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Aug;57:30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
6
Background and evaluation design of a community-based health-promoting school intervention: Fit Lifestyle at School and at Home (FLASH).背景与基于社区的促进健康学校干预的评价设计:学校与家庭健康促进生活方式(FLASH)。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7088-3.
7
Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol.农村图书馆实施步行团体或步行团体加公民参与,以提高农村社区的可达性:一项比较有效性试验研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1895. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16788-0.
8
Scaling Up Physical Activity Promotion Projects on the Community Level for Women in Difficult Life Situations and Older People: BIG-5 and GET-10-A Study Protocol.社区层面促进困难生活处境中的妇女和老年人身体活动项目的规模化:BIG-5 和 GET-10-A 研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:837982. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837982. eCollection 2022.
9
Cluster-randomised trial on participatory community-based outdoor physical activity promotion programs in adults aged 65-75 years in Germany: protocol of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE intervention trial.德国针对 65-75 岁老年人的基于社区的参与式户外体育活动促进项目的整群随机试验:户外积极干预试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):1197. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6124-z.
10
Capacity building for health through community-based participatory nutrition intervention research in rural communities.通过农村社区以社区为基础的参与式营养干预研究进行卫生能力建设。
Fam Community Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):175-85. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3181e4bb58.

引用本文的文献

1
Annual trends in childhood fracture and injury in Beijing from 2010 to 2019.2010年至2019年北京儿童骨折与损伤的年度趋势。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 10;26(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08831-5.
2
The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?促进身体活动的参与式项目面临的挑战:扩大什么以及如何扩大?
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0326737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326737. eCollection 2025.
3
Limitations of point-of-care testing for low SARS CoV-2 loads: Insights for future pandemics.

本文引用的文献

1
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions.在公共卫生干预措施的共同创造和评估中运用参与式方法的框架、原则和建议。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 9;5:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9. eCollection 2019.
2
Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants.全球 2001 年至 2016 年身体活动不足趋势分析:基于 358 项以人群为基础的调查的汇总分析,涉及 190 万参与者。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
针对低新冠病毒载量的即时检测局限性:对未来大流行的启示。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 Mar 20;17(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4671.
4
Multilevel Mediators on the Associations of Neighborhood Social Environmental Factors and Severity of Metabolic Syndrome: The Jackson Heart Study.邻里社会环境因素与代谢综合征严重程度关联中的多级中介因素:杰克逊心脏研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 7;14(1):e035216. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035216. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
5
Unraveling diarrheal disease knowledge, understanding, and management practices among climate change vulnerable coastal communities in Ghana.解析加纳气候变化脆弱沿海社区对腹泻病的知识、理解和管理实践。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;12:1352275. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352275. eCollection 2024.
6
"Like a broom tied together": A qualitative exploration of social cohesion and its role in community capacity strengthening to support integrated health in Nigeria.“如绑在一起的扫帚”:对社会凝聚力及其在增强尼日利亚社区能力以支持综合卫生方面作用的定性探索。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;3(10):e0002508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002508. eCollection 2023.
7
A Person-Centered Perspective on Physical Activity-Related Barriers Perceived by Male Fluctuators 50 Plus: A Cross-Sectional Study.50 岁以上男性波动者对与身体活动相关障碍的感知:一项横断面研究——以人本主义视角切入
Am J Mens Health. 2023 Sep-Oct;17(5):15579883231193915. doi: 10.1177/15579883231193915.
8
Capacity building in participatory stakeholder groups: results from a German research consortium on active lifestyles.参与式利益相关者群体的能力建设:德国积极生活方式研究联盟的成果。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii65-ii78. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab165.
9
Evaluation of community readiness for change prior to a participatory physical activity intervention in Germany.在德国进行参与式身体活动干预之前,对社区变革准备情况的评估。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii40-ii52. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab161.
10
Toward the economic evaluation of participatory approaches in health promotion: lessons from four German physical activity promotion projects.迈向健康促进中参与式方法的经济评估:来自四个德国身体活动促进项目的经验教训。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii79-ii92. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab158.
Empowering senior citizens for healthy nutrition in Germany: A pilot study.
助力德国老年人实现健康营养:一项试点研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Apr 22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12580.
4
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 3 部分:抽样、数据收集和分析。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
5
Theories, models and frameworks used in capacity building interventions relevant to public health: a systematic review.与公共卫生相关的能力建设干预措施中使用的理论、模型和框架:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4919-y.
6
Building Capacity for Evidence-Based Public Health: Reconciling the Pulls of Practice and the Push of Research.建设循证公共卫生能力:协调实践的拉力和研究的推力。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:27-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014746. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
7
Co-producing active lifestyles as whole-system-approach: theory, intervention and knowledge-to-action implications.将积极生活方式作为全系统方法共同产生:理论、干预措施及知识转化为行动的意义。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Feb 1;34(1):47-59. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax053.
8
Community Capacity Building for Physical Activity Promotion among Older Adults-A Literature Review.促进老年人身体活动的社区能力建设——文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 13;14(9):1058. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091058.
9
Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews.体育活动对健康的益处:对当前系统评价的系统评价
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;32(5):541-556. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000437.
10
Testing the validity of a stage assessment on health enhancing physical activity in a chinese university student sample.在中国大学生样本中检验一项关于促进健康的身体活动的阶段评估的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 15;16:260. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2931-2.