Oregon Health & Science University School of Nursing, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Texas A & M University Institute for Advancing Health through Agriculture, 1500 Research Parkway, Centeq Building B, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1895. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16788-0.
Rural residents generally lack adequate physical activity to benefit health and reduce disparities in chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. The Socioecological Model describes physical activity as involving a dynamic and reciprocal interaction between individual, social, and community factors. Community group-based walking programs and civic engagement interventions aimed at enhancing physical activity have been successful in rural communities but have not targeted all three socioecological levels. Public libraries can act as innovative public health partners in rural communities. However, challenges remain because rural libraries often lack the capacity to implement evidence-based health promotion programming. The goals of this study are (1) build the capacity for rural libraries to implement evidence-based health promotion programs, (2) compare changes in physical activity between a group-based walking program and a combined group-based walking and civic engagement program with rural residents, and (3) conduct an implementation evaluation.
We will conduct a comparative effectiveness study of a group-based walking (standard approach) versus a group-based walking plus civic engagement program (combined approach) aimed at enhancing walkability to increase physical activity among rural adults. Key mediators between the program effects and change in outcomes will also be identified. Finally, we will evaluate program implementation, conduct a cost effectiveness evaluation, and use a positive deviance analysis to understand experiences of high and low changers on key outcomes. Twenty towns will be matched and randomized to one of the two conditions and our aim is to enroll a total of 350-400 rural residents (15-20 per town). Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months.
This study will build the capacity of rural libraries to implement evidence-based walking programs as well as other health promotion programs in their communities. The study results will answer questions regarding the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two multilevel physical activity interventions targeting rural communities. We will learn what works and how these multilevel interventions can be implemented in rural populations.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05677906.
农村居民普遍缺乏足够的身体活动来促进健康,并减少心血管疾病和某些癌症等慢性病方面的差异。社会生态学模型将身体活动描述为个体、社会和社区因素之间动态和相互作用的过程。以社区为基础的团体步行计划和旨在增强身体活动的公民参与干预措施在农村社区取得了成功,但并未针对所有三个社会生态学层面。公共图书馆可以在农村社区充当创新的公共卫生合作伙伴。然而,仍然存在挑战,因为农村图书馆通常缺乏实施基于证据的健康促进计划的能力。本研究的目标是:(1) 增强农村图书馆实施基于证据的健康促进计划的能力;(2) 比较团体步行计划与团体步行加公民参与相结合的计划对农村居民身体活动的影响;(3) 进行实施评估。
我们将对以社区为基础的团体步行(标准方法)与以社区为基础的团体步行加公民参与(联合方法)进行比较有效性研究,旨在提高可步行性,以增加农村成年人的身体活动量。还将确定方案效果与结果变化之间的主要中介因素。最后,我们将评估方案的实施情况,进行成本效益评估,并使用积极偏差分析来了解关键结果的高变化者和低变化者的经验。将对 20 个城镇进行匹配和随机分组到两种条件之一,我们的目标是总共招募 350-400 名农村居民(每个城镇 15-20 名)。研究结果将在基线、6、12 和 24 个月进行评估。
本研究将增强农村图书馆实施基于证据的步行计划以及在其社区中实施其他健康促进计划的能力。研究结果将回答关于两种针对农村社区的多层次身体活动干预措施的相对有效性和成本效益的问题。我们将了解什么有效以及这些多层次干预措施如何在农村人口中实施。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05677906。